Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:46:39.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How pluricentric is the French language? An investigation of attitudes towards Quebec French compared to European French1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2012

RUTH KIRCHER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study that employed a questionnaire and a matched-guise experiment to investigate the attitudes that Quebec francophones, anglophones, French-English bilinguals and allophones hold towards Quebec French compared to European French. The findings indicate that attitudes towards Quebec French on the solidarity dimension have improved since the 1980s, while attitudes on the status dimension have remained the same. These findings are interpreted in the context of the burgeoning of Quebecers’ sense of belonging to their society on the one hand, and the tradition of viewing French as a monocentric rather than a pluricentric language on the other hand.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 345 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

d'Anglejan, A. and Tucker, G. R. (1973). Sociolinguistic correlates of speech style in Quebec. In: Shuy, R. W. and Fasold, R. W. (eds), Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Association québécoise des professeurs de français (1977). Le congrès du dixième anniversaire: Les résolutions de l'Assemblée Générale. Québec français, 28: 10–12.Google Scholar
Bouchard, C. (2002). La langue et le nombril: Une histoire sociolinguistique du Québec, new edition. Montreal: Fides.Google Scholar
Bouchard, P. and Maurais, J. (1999). La norme et l’école: L'opinion des Québécois. Terminogramme, 91/92: 91–116.Google Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Language policies and language attitudes: Le monde de la francophonie. In: Coupland, N. and Jaworski, A. (eds), Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook. London: Macmillan, pp. 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y. and Lepicq, D. (1993). Québécois French and language issues in Quebec. In: Posner, R. and Green, J. N. (eds), Trends in Romance Linguistics. Vol. 5: Bilingualism and Linguistic Conflict in Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 345–381.Google Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H. and Lambert, W. E. (1975). Social consequences of accommodating one's style of speech: A cross-national investigation. Linguistics 13, 166: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Certeau, M. de, Julia, D. and Revel, J. (1975). Une politique de la langue: La Révolution française et les patois. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Conrick, M. and Regan, V. (2007). French in Canada: Language Issues. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Conseil de la langue française (1991). L'aménagement de la langue: Pour une description du français québécois. Rapport et avis au ministre responsable de la Charte de la langue française. Quebec: Conseil de la langue française.Google Scholar
Corbeil, J.-C. (2008). Une langue qui se planifie. In: Plourde, M. and Georgeault, P. (eds), Le français au Québec: 400 ans d'histoire et de vie, new edition. Quebec/Montreal: Conseil supérieur de la langue française/Fides, pp. 375–388.Google Scholar
Echeverria, B. (2005). Language attitudes in San Sebastian: The Basque vernacular as challenge to Spanish language hegemony. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26 (3): 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaitz, J. (1988). The Ideology of English: French Perceptions of English as a World Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRANQUS: Les étapes de travail. http://franqus.ca/dictio/accueil.jsp (accessed 05–11-2011).Google Scholar
Fuga, M. (2002). Attitude Change within Quebec's Francophone Population. Unpublished Honours Thesis, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. and Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13 (4): 266–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genesee, F. and Holobow, N. E. (1989). Change and stability in intergroup perceptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8 (1): 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamers, J. F. and Blanc, M. H. A. (2000). Bilinguality and Bilingualism, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kircher, R. (2010). Language attitudes in Quebec: A contemporary perspective. PhD thesis, Queen Mary, University of London.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. and Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60 (1): 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laur, E. (2001). Perceptions linguistiques à Montréal. Doctoral Thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Laur, E. (2008). Contribution à l’étude des perceptions linguistiques: La méthodologie des faux-couples revisitée. [Quebec]: Office québécois de la langue française. http://www.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/etudes/notemetho_laur.pdf (accessed 14-12-2011).Google Scholar
Levine, M. V. (1990). The Reconquest of Montreal: Language Policy and Social Change in a Bilingual City. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Lockerbie, I. (2005). The debate on l'aménagement du français in Québec. In: Lockerbie, I., Molinaro, I., Larose, K. and Oakes, L. (eds), French as the Common Language in Québec: History, debates and Positions. Quebec: Éditions Nota Bene, pp. 15–65.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. A. (1993). French: From Dialect to Standard. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdi, G. (1992). French as a pluricentric language. In: Clyne, M. (ed.), Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 149–178.Google Scholar
Meney, L. (2010). Main basse sur la langue: Idéologie et interventionnisme linguistique au Québec. Montréal: Éditions Liber.Google Scholar
Oakes, L. (2001). Language and National Identity: Comparing France and Sweden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, L. (2008). Language planning and policy in Québec. In: Ayoun, D. (ed.), Studies in French Applied Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 345–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, L. and Warren, J. (2007). Language, Citizenship and Identity in Quebec. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office de la langue française (1965). Norme du français parlé et écrit au Québec. [Quebec]: Ministère des affaires culturelles.Google Scholar
Ostiguy, L. and Tousignant, C. (1993). Le français québécois: Normes et usages. Montreal: Guérin Universitaire.Google Scholar
Paquot, A. (2008). Non à la ‘langue standard québécoise’. Le Devoir, 12 March 2008. http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/179979/non-a-la-langue-standard-quebecoise (accessed 01-12-2009).Google Scholar
Picoche, J. and Marchello-Nizia, C. (1989). Histoire de la langue française. Nancy: Nathan.Google Scholar
Pöll, B. (2005). Le français langue pluricentrique? Études sur la variation diatopique d'une langue standard. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Poirier, C. (1994). La langue parlé en Nouvelle-France: vers une convergence des explications. In: Mougeon, R. and Beniak, E. (eds), Les origines du français québécois. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université Laval. pp. 237–273.Google Scholar
Preston, M. S. (1963). Evaluational reactions to English, Canadian French and European French voices. MA Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H. and Hewstone, M. (1987). The measurement of language attitudes. In: Ammon, U., Dittmar, N. and Mattheier, K. J. (eds), Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of Language and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter pp. 1068–1081.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H. and Sebastian, R. J. (1982). An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes towards language variation. In: Ryan, E. B. and Giles, H. (eds), Attitudes towards Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
St-Laurent, N. (2008). Le français et les jeunes. [Quebec]: Conseil supérieur de la langue française. http://www.cslf.gouv.qc.ca/publications/PubF223/F223.pdf (accessed on 29-06-2009).Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2007). 2006 Census: Profile for Census Metropolitan Areas and Census Agglomerations, Montreal. http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/profiles/release/RetrieveProductTable.cfm?TPL=RETR&ALEVEL=3&APATH=3&CATNO=&DETAIL=0&DIM=&DS=99&FL=0&FREE=0&GAL=0&GC=99&GK=NA&GRP=1&IPS=&METH=0&ORDER=1&PID=94536&PTYPE=89103&RL=0&S=1&ShowAll=No&StartRow=1&SUB=0&Temporal=2006&Theme=81&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=&GID=777155 (accessed 28-09-2009).Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2009). Definitions: Mother tongue of person. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/concepts/definitions/language-langue01-eng.htm (accessed 01-08-2009)Google Scholar
Turcotte, N. (2009). Les Québécois parlent ‘joual’. Ils pensent ‘joual’. Ils écrivent ‘joual’. Vigile.net, 13 November 2009. http://vigile.net/Les-Quebecois-parlent-joual-Ils (accessed 01-12-2009).Google Scholar