No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Review of doctoral research in second language acquisition, language learning and teaching in Poland (2006–2010)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2012
Abstract
This paper reviews 25 doctoral dissertations on second language acquisition (SLA), English language learning and teaching submitted in Poland in the years 2006–2010. The theses were selected for review on the basis of the recommendations of Ph.D. supervisors from leading Polish universities and they are divided into six groups: learner autonomy, individual differences, language subsystems and skills, culture, assessment and miscellaneous. The dissertations are discussed with respect to their main findings as well as their strengths and weaknesses, and the paper concludes with an overall evaluation of the research in terms of its dominant themes and methodology.
- Type
- Surveys of Ph.D. Thesis
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
References
Anderson, N. J. & Vandergrift, L. (1996). Increasing metacognitive awareness in the L2 classroom by using think-aloud protocols and other verbal report forms. In Oxford, R. L. (ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, 3–18.Google Scholar
Banasiak-Ryba, I. (2010). The influence of cultural background on the choice of vocabulary learning strategies. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching learner autonomy. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching 40, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. E. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (2002). Strategies for success: A practical guide to learning English. San Francisco, CA: Longman.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cirocki, A. (2008). The extensive reading approach to literature in the EFL secondary school classroom: A qualitative study. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L. & Chi, J. C. (2001). Learning style survey. The SBI Institute, June 2001. http://carla.acad.umn.edu/profiles/Cohenprofile.html.Google Scholar
Coste, D., North, B., Sheils, J. & Trim, J. (2000). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csizer, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal 89, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czura, A. (2010). The influence of assessment type on the development of autonomy in lower secondary school learners. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wrocław.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, M. (2008). Strategies of foreign language learning and use: The educational value of strategy training in teaching English to adult learners. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Domalewska, D. (2009). The socio-cultural component in the teaching of English to Polish secondary school students. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Doron, H. (1993). Teaching English to infants and primary school children in Israel: A special project. Educational Media International 3, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning 40, 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Questionnaires in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, Thames Valley University, London, 203–229.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M. E. (1996). Understanding second language learning difficulties: Looking beneath the surface. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekiert, M. (2006). Investigating the role of learner training in effective foreign language teaching aimed at the development of learning strategies and learner autonomy. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 22 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly 29, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faigley, L. & Witte, S. P. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication 32, 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1992). Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops: There are no contrast effects here. Journal of Phonetics 20, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F. & Masgoret, A. M. (1997). Towards the full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. The Modern Language Journal 81.3, 344–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gołębiowski, Z. (1998). Rhetorical approaches to scientific writing: An English-Polish contrastive study. Text 18, 67–102.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Horak, K. (2008). Sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic aspects of foreign language classroom discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Silesia, Katowice.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. (1987). Surveying students’ beliefs about language learning. In Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. London and New York: Prentice Hall, 119–129.Google Scholar
Jaroszek, M. (2008). Factors determining the development of discourse competence in advanced learners of English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Silesia.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning 16, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimas, A. (2009). Goal-setting as a motivating factor in foreign language learning. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wrocław.Google Scholar
Kobyłecka, A. (2006). Self-regulation in second language learning. Investigating the influence of cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational factors on learning English by Polish learners in the secondary context. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Kruk, M. (2010). The development of learner autonomy through Internet resources and its impact on English language attainment. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. (1992). Contrastive rhetoric of Japanese and English: A critical approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Education, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesiak-Bielawska, E. (2007). The relationship between learning styles preferences and reading and listening strategy use in English as a foreign language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, R. (2010). Testing advanced L2 learners’ knowledge of lexical collocations. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Maciejewska-Stępień, E. (2008). Incorporating intercultural communication training into the foreign language classroom: A case study evaluation of a Socrates project. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2010). Production-oriented and reception-based approaches to teaching English grammar: An empirical study. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Nowacka, M. (2008). Phonetic attainment in Polish university and college students of English: A study in the productive and receptive pronunciation skills. Ph.D. dissertation, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin.Google Scholar
Owczarek, D. (2010). Dialogic approach to the evaluation of intercultural communicative competence in pre-service English language teacher training. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies. New York: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1993). Style Analysis Survey (SAS): Assessing your own learning and working styles. In Reid, J. R. (ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (Appendix A). Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 208–217.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Pospieszyńska-Wojtkowiak, M. (2010). Individual differences and oral attainment in foreign language learning. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Poszytek, P. (2007). Testing language proficiency in Polish secondary education in the context of examination and certification standards of the Council of Europe and the European Union. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Rojczyk, A. (2008). Perception of English and Polish obstruents. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Silesia, Katowice.Google Scholar
Rokoszewska, K. (2007). Comparing selected modern methods of teaching English to young learners in various aspects of foreign language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, Wrocław University.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescents’ self-image (revised edn). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Salski, Ł. (2006). Contrastive rhetoric and teaching English composition skills. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Łódź.Google Scholar
Scharle, A. & Szabo, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smolik, M. (2007). Investigating scoring validity. A study of the ‘nowa matura’ speaking exam in English at the basic level. Ph.D. dissertation, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin.Google Scholar
Sroka, M. (2008). Developing reading comprehension skills in the first, second and foreign language contexts: A cross-cultural perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Trepczyńska, M. (2009). Self- and peer evaluation in writing: A study of the effects of training in evaluation on the development of writing skills of Polish advanced learners of English. Ph.D. dissertation, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning 52, 755–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R. (2001). Research in extensive reading. (www1.harnet.ne.jp/-waring/papers/kiyo2001.html) (date of access: 15 March 2005).Google Scholar
Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated academic learning and achievement. Educational Psychology Review 2, 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar