Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:56:56.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mechanism of inverted relativization in Japanese: A silent linker and inversion1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2012

KEN HIRAIWA
KEN HIRAIWA*
Affiliation:
Meiji Gakuin University
*
Author's address: 1-2-37 Shirokane-dai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan108-8636hiraiwa@ltr.meijigakuin.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Japanese has two peculiar types of relative clause (RC), No-RCs and De-RCs. In these types of relative clause, what looks like a (pivot) head noun appears at the left edge of the clause and is accompanied by no and de, respectively. This sharply contrasts with regular prenominal relative clauses in Japanese, which conform to the head-final word order pattern. The aim of this article is to investigate the syntax and semantics of these two types of relative clause in detail and reveal differences between them. Specifically, I will propose that (i) no in No-RCs is an appositive genitive particle licensed by a silent linker head, and (ii) de in De-RCs is a continuative/participial form of the copula da. Drawing a parallel with NP-no NP constructions and building on an idea from S.-Y. Kuroda's dissertation, it will be argued that No-RCs are derived by DP-internal inversion mediated by the linker. On the other hand, De-RCs will be shown to be relatives conjoined with the copula de. It will be further suggested that the fact that Korean and Mandarin Chinese lack equivalents of De-RCs is due to the absence of the appositive genitive particle and hence of DP-internal inversion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 345 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

I am deeply grateful to two anonymous JL referees for very helpful comments. This work is dedicated to the memory of S.-Y. Kuroda. The project reported here is partially funded by the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (No. 22720168) for which I am very grateful. Thanks to Edith Aldridge, Tomo Fujii, Satoshi Kinsui, Akira Watanabe, John Whitman, and participants in the TCP Workshop 2010 (Keio University) and the 20th Japanese/Korean Linguistics (University of Oxford) as well as my graduate seminars at Meiji Gakuin University and Kwansei Gakuin University. I would like to thank Chung-hye Han and Heejeong Ko for Korean data, and Feng-Fan Hsieh for Mandarin Chinese and Taiwanese data. I thank Adams Bodomo for kindly proofreading the manuscript. Finally, special thanks to Caroline Heycock and Ewa Jaworska for their kind editorial help.

References

REFERENCES

Abe, Yasuaki. 1994. Rentaisyuusyoku no syomondai [Issues in noun modification]. In Takubo, (ed.), 153–171.Google Scholar
Adger, David & Ramchand, Gillian. 2003. Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry 34.3, 325–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery. 2007. Relative clauses. In Shopen, (ed.), 206–236.Google Scholar
Asano, Shin'ya & Ura, Hiroyuki. 2010. Mood and case: With special reference to genitive case conversion in Kansai Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19, 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoun, Joseph & Li, Audrey. 1993. On some differences between Chinese and Japanese wh-elements. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 365–372.Google Scholar
Bach, Emon. 1971. Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 153–166.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark & Collins, Chris. 2006. Linkers and the internal structure of vP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24, 307–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basilico, David. 1996. Head positions and internally headed relative clauses. Language 72, 498–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodomo, Adams & Hiraiwa, Ken. 2010. Relativization in Dàgáárè and its typological implications: Left-headed but internally-headed. Lingua 120.4, 953–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. The Minimalist Program for linguistic theory. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2009. The prenominal origin of relative clauses. Ms., University of Venice. [Handout at http://lear.unive.it/handle/10278/1055.]Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 1994. The factive construction in Kwa. In Lefebvre, Claire (ed.), Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien, 31–65. Montreal: Groupe de recherche sur le créole haïtien, Départment de linguistique, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2002. The syntax of relativization. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Linkers and relators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuya, Kaori. 2009. The DP hypothesis through the lens of Japanese nominal collocation constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with special reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of grammar, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harada, S.-I. 1971. Ga–No conversion and idiolectal variation in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 60, 25–38.Google Scholar
Harada, S.-I. 1976. Ga–No conversion revisited. Gengo Kenkyu 70, 23–38.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. On Nominative–Genitive Conversion. In Guerzoni, Elena & Matushansky, Ora (eds.), A few from Building E39 (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 39), 65–123. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2009. The head-internal relativization parameter in Gur: D and EPP. In Schardl, Anisa, Walkow, Martin & Abdurrahman, Muhammad (eds.), North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 38.1, 297–310. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2010. The syntax of light nouns and indeterminates in Japanese. Ms., Meiji Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2012. Kuroda's left-headedness and linkers. In Frellesvig, Bjarke & Sells, Peter (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 20, 321–336. Chicago, IL: CSLI/The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horie, Kaoru. 1998. On the polyfunctionality of the Japanese particle no: From the perspective of ontology and grammaticalization. In Ohori, Toshio (ed.), Studies in Japanese grammaticalization: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 169–192. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Hoshi, Koji. 1995. Structural and interpretive aspects of head-internal and head-external relative clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Ishigaki, Kenji. 1955. Zyosi no rekisiteki kenkyuu [A historical study of particles]. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1985. Relative clauses. In Shopen, (ed.), 141–170.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 1994. Rentaisyuusyoku no ‘ta’ ni tuite [On ‘ta’ in relative clauses]. In Takubo, (ed.), 19–65.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 1995. Iwayuru nihongo no N′-sakuzyo ni tuite [On the so-called N′-deletion in Japanese]. 1994 Nanzan Symposium, 153–176. Nagoya: Nanzan University.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki. 2000. Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato. 1977. No-introduced relative clauses. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese XII, 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Ross, Claudia. 1982. Prenominal modification in Chinese and Japanese. Linguistic Analysis 9.1, 19–53.Google Scholar
Kondo, Yasuhiro. 2000. Nihongo kizyutubunpoo no riron [A theory of Japanese descriptive grammar]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1974. Pivot-independent relativization in Japanese I. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 3, 59–93.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y 1975–76. Pivot-independent relativization in Japanese II. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 4, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y 1976–77. Pivot-independent relativization in Japanese III. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 5, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1992. Japanese syntax and semantics: Collected papers. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1999. Syubunaizai kankeisetu [Head-internal relative clauses]. In Kuroda, S.-Y. & Nakamura, Masaru (eds.), Kotoba no kaku to syuuen [The core and periphery of language], 27–103. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 2008. Head internal relative clauses, quantifier float, the definiteness effect and the mathematics of determiners. San Diego Linguistics Papers 3, 126–183.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 2009. Chinese as a reverse Ezafe language. Yuyanxue Luncong [Journal of Linguistics] 39, 30–85. Pekin: Pekin University.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard [K.] & Yamakido, Hiroko. 2008. Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In McNally, Louise & Kennedy, Christopher (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, 43–70. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, Anne. 1990. Functional heads as proper governors. In Carter, Juli (ed.), North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 20, 348–362. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi. 1985. ‘No-pronominalization’ in Japanese. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 10, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary L. 1979. Existential sentences in English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Murasugi, Keiko. 1991. Noun phrases in Japanese and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Okutsu, Keiichiro. 1974. Seisei nihon bunpooron [Generative grammar of Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1969. On so-called ‘pronouns’. In Reibel, David & Schane, Sanford (eds.), Modern studies in English, 201–224. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 1999. Complementizer cliticization in Tagalog and English. In Kitto, Catherine & Smallwood, Carolyn (eds.), Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA) 6 (Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16.2), 297–312. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru, Lin, T.-H. Jonah & Murasugi, Keiko. 2008. N′-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17.3, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru & Murasugi, Keiko. 1990. N′-deletion in Japanese: A preliminary study. In Hoji, Hajime (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 1, 258–301. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko. 1999. Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8.2, 47–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 2007. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2, 2nd edn.: Complex constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Takubo, Yukinori (ed.). 1994. Nihongo no meisi syuushoku hyoogen [Noun modifications in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Tonoike, Shigeo. 1990. ‘No’ no ronrikeisiki [The logical form of no]. Meiji Gakuin Ronso [The Journal of English & American Literature and Linguistics] 467, 69–99.Google Scholar
Tonosaki, Sumiko. 1998. Change-relatives in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 16, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsubomoto, Atsuro. 1981. It's all no: Unifying function of no in Japanese. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 17, 393–403. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1996. Nominative–Genitive Conversion and agreement in Japanese: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5.4, 373–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 2004. Parametrization of quantificational determiners and head-internal relatives. Language and Linguistics 5.1, 59–97. Taiwan: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 2010. Notes on nominal ellipsis and the nature of no and classifiers in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Janis S. 1987. An indefiniteness restriction for relative clauses in Lakhota. In Reuland, Eric J. & ter Meulen, Alice G. B. (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 168–190. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yuzawa, Kokichiro. 1929. ‘No’ ‘ga’ o tomonau ku no itikeisiki – syuusyokuhoo no ichi [A form of phrases with nominative and accusative]. Kokugokyooiku [Language Education] 2.Google Scholar