Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T18:24:28.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential words in English: examples from morphological processes in Nigerian English

English grammar and lexis takes on a life of its own in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2012

Dare Owolabi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is now common knowledge that the English language has become part of Nigeria's linguistic family, albeit as a second language that has been ‘home-grown…adapted and tamed to suit the Nigerian environment’ (Adegbija, 2004: 19). Summarizing Alamin A. Mazrui (2004), Akere (2006: 9) describes this domestication as ‘the transformation of English as an alien medium, to make it respond to local imagery, figures of speech, sound patterns and the general cultural milieu of the region’. This has been the practice of many writers where English is the colonial masters' language and is now adopted as a second language, but with ‘local colour’, as noted by Emenyonu (2006: xi). This dynamic and creative variety has helped Nigerians express their world view in a more international medium. In addition, there are more ‘pragmatic’ sub-varieties, including what Omolewa (1979: 14–15) calls ‘working English’. This is, however, different from the widespread Pidgin English, which continues to serve as the linguistic bridge across the linguistic Babel of Nigeria. While Pidgin is greatly influenced by the immediate local languages, thus making uniformity difficult to achieve, the emerging Nigerian English (henceforth NE) is not as heavily dependent on indigenous local languages. According to Igboanusi (2002: 4), ‘NE has its origin in British English, and the lexicon of NE has therefore shown a strong British influence.’ In other words, while Pidgin is common among the uneducated and spoken by the educated when necessary, NE is spoken by the educated and the level of education determines the variety of NE used by individuals. NE should be seen as an autonomous variety, showing acceptable departures from the rules of standard diction, pronunciation and grammar. The contact of English with indigenous languages in Nigeria is bound to lead to greater deviation from the standard in the future. Since Nigeria has one of the largest populations of speakers of English as a second language in the world (Akere, 2009; Jowitt, 2009), this is bound to have implications for English as a global language.

Type
Original Article
Information
English Today , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 47 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adegbija, E. 2004. ‘The domestication of English in Nigeria.’ In Awonusi, S. & Babalola, E. A. (eds), The Domestication of English in Nigeria. A Festschrift in Honour of Abiodun Adetugbo. Lagos: University of Lagos Press, pp. 20–44.Google Scholar
Akere, F. 2006. ‘The English language in Nigeria: The sociolinguistic dynamics of decolonization and globalization.’ Keynote address presented at the conference of the Nigerian English Studies Association at the University of Ilorin, Nigeria, pp. 2–16.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. & Fudeman, K. 2005. What is Morphology? Australia: Blackwell Publishing.Google ScholarPubMed
Emenyonu, E. E. 2006. ‘New directions in African literature: building on the legacies of the 20th century.’ In Emenyonu, E. E. (ed.), New Directions in African Literature 25. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books (Nigeria), pp. xi–xiv.Google Scholar
Igboanusi, H. 2002. A Dictionary of Nigerian English Usage. Ibadan: Enicrownfit Publishers.Google Scholar
Jowitt, D. 2009. ‘English language teaching: a view from the millennium.’ Lead paper presented at the Seventh National Conference of the National Association of Teachers and Researchers in English as a Second Language, Federal Polytechnic, Nasarawa, Nigeria, 6–9 October.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. 1985. ‘Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle.’ In Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. G. (eds), English in the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Okoro, O. 2004. ‘Codifying Nigerian English: some practical problems of labelling.’ In Awonusi, S. & Babalola, E. A. (eds), The Domestication of English in Nigeria. A Festschrift in Honour of Abiodun Adetugbo. Lagos: University of Lagos Press, pp. 166–81.Google Scholar
Omolewa, M. 1979. ‘The emergence of non-standard English in Nigeria 1842–1926.’ In Ubahakwe, E. (ed.), Varieties and Functions of the English Language in Nigeria. Lagos: African Universities Press, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. & Leech, G. 2006. English – One Tongue, Many Voices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Uhunmwangho, A. 2009. ‘Is there a Nigerian English? SMS text messaging and the use of English language in Nigeria.’ In Adegbite, W. & Olajide, B. (eds), English in the Nigerian Environment: Emerging Patterns and New Challenges. Lagos: Olivetree Publishing Venture, p. 35.Google Scholar