Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T03:03:13.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF SPILOMICRUS WESTWOOD IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO (HYMENOPTERA: PROCTOTRUPOIDEA, DIAPRIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner
Lubomir Masner
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The species of the genus Spilomicrus in America north of Mexico are revised. A generic diagnosis of Spilomicrus, key to genera of Nearctic Spilomicrini, and key to Spilomicrus species in America north of Mexico are given. Four species-groups are defined, viz. distinctus, exul, formosus, and stigmaticalis. Character states, variation, distribution, and relationships of each species are discussed. Twelve of 21 species are recognized as new: S. boweni, S. crassicornis, S. distinctus, S. exul, S. inornatus, S. palustris, S. pumilio, S. robustus, S. sanbornei, S. stepheni, S. superbus, and S. sylvicola. Nine previously known species are redescribed: S. antennatus (Jurine), S. atriclavus Ashmead, S. bifoveatus Kieffer, S. brevicornis (Ashmead), S. flavicornis Ashmead, S. formosus Jansson, S. ruficornis (Provancher), S. stigmaticalis Westwood, and S. virginicus Fouts. The males of S. brevicornis and S. virginicus, as well as the females of S. flavicornis and S. ruficornis, are described for the first time. The following new synonymies are proposed: S. antennatus (= Basalys californica Ashmead), S. atriclavus (= S. foutsi Masner, S. kiefferi Fouts), and S. stigmaticalis (= S. armatus Ashmead).

Résumé

Les espèces du genre Spilomicrus en Amérique au nord du Mexique ont été révisées. Un diagnostic générique de Spilomicrus, une clé aux genres néarctiques de Spilomicrini et une clé aux espèces de Spilomicrus en Amérique au nord du Mexique sont donnés. Quatre groupes d’espèces sont reconnus; à savoir : distinctus, exul, formosus et stigmaticalis. L’état des caractéristiques, la variabilité, la distribution et les rapports de chaque espèce sont discutés. Douze des 21 espèces sont reconnues comme nouvelles : S. boweni, S. crassicornis, S. distinctus, S. exul, S. inornatus, S. palustris, S. pumilio, S. robustus, S. sanbornei, S. stepheni, S. superbus, et S. sylvicola. Neuf espèces préalablement connues ont été décrites à nouveau : S. antennatus (Jurine), S. atriclavus Ashmead, S. bifoveatus Kieffer, S. brevicornis (Ashmead), S. flavicornis Ashmead, S. formosus Jansson, S. ruficornis (Provancher), S. stigmaticalis Westwood et S. virginicus Fouts. Les mâles de S. brevicornis et de S. virginicus, ainsi que les femelles de S. flavicornis et de S. ruficornis ont été décrits pour la première fois. Les nouvelles synonymies suivantes sont proposées : S. antennatus (= Basalys californica Ashmead), S. atriclavus (= S. foutsi Masner, S. kiefferi Fouts) et S. stigmaticalis (= S. armatus Ashmead).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 123 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 107 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnett, R.H., and Samuelson, G.A.. 1986. The Insect and Spider Collections of the World. E.J. Brill/Flora & Fauna Publications, Gainesville, FL. 220 pp.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1893. Monograph of the North American Proctotrypidae. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 45. 472 pp.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1902. Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition. XXVIII. Hymenoptera. Wash. Acad. Sci. Proc. 4: 117–274.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.C. 1911. New Hymenoptera from the Philippine Islands. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 38: 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, A.P. 1915. Australian Hymenoptera Proctotrypoidea No. 3. Trans. R. Soc. S. Austr. 39: 384–454.Google Scholar
Early, J.W. 1978. Two new wasp parasites (Hymenoptera: Diapriidae) of New Zealand Sciomyzidae (Diptera). J. R. Soc. N.Z. 8: 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerster, A. 1856. Hymenopterologische Studien, Vol. 2. Aachen. 152 pp.Google Scholar
Fouts, R.M. 1925. New serphoid parasites from North and South America (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 27: 147–152.Google Scholar
Fouts, R.M. 1926. Notes on Serphoidea with descriptions of new species (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 28: 167–179.Google Scholar
Gahan, A.B., and Rohwer, S.A.. 1917. Lectotypes of the species of Hymenoptera (except Apoidea) described by Abbé Provancher. Can. Ent. 49: 331–336.Google Scholar
Haliday, A.H. 1857. Note on a peculiar form of the ovaries observed in a Hymenopterous Insect, constituting a new genus and species of the family Diapriidae. Nat. Hist. Rev. 4: 166–174.Google Scholar
Hellén, W. 1963. Die Diapriinen Finnlands (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Fauna Fennica 14. 35 pp.Google Scholar
Herrich-Schaeffer, G.A.W.in Panzer, G.W.F.. 1838. Faunae insectorum Germaniae initia, Heft 157: 24. Nuerenberg (Regensburg). 1838.Google Scholar
Jansson, A. 1942. Neue Proctotrupiden aus Schweden. I. Ent. Tidskr. 63: 210–216.Google Scholar
Jurine, L. 1807. Nouvelle Méthode de classer les Hyménoptères et les Diptères. Hyménoptères. Tom. 1. Geneve. 1897.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J.in André, E.. 1910. Species des Hyménoptères d'Europe et d'Algérie… Vol. 10. Paris. 1910.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1916. Diapriidae. Das Tierreich 44. 627 pp.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A.in Medvedev, G.S.. 1978. Keys to insects of the European part of USSR; Hymenoptera, superfamily Proctotrupoidea. 3 (2): 538–691. Nauka, Leningrad. 1978.Google Scholar
Mani, M.S. 1941. Catalogue of Indian Serphoidea, Catalogue of Indian Insects, pt. 26. New Delhi. 1941. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1964 a. A redescription of three species of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) from Jurine's collection. Entomophaga 9: 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masner, L. 1964 b. A comparison of some Nearctic and Palearctic genera of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) with revisional notes. Acta Soc. ent. Cechoslov. 61: 123–155.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1969. The Provancher species of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera). Naturaliste can. 96: 775–784.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1980. Key to genera of Scelionidae of the Holarctic region, with descriptions of new genera and species (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 113. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L., and Muesebeck, C.F.W.. 1968. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the United States National Museum. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 270. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W.in Krombein, K.V.. 1958. Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S.D.A. Agric. Monogr. 2. First Supplement, pp. 88–94.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W.in Krombein, K.V. et al. 1979. Proctotrupoidea. Catalog of Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Vol. 1. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1198 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., Krombein, K.V., and Townes, H.K.. 1951. Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S.D.A. Agric. Monogr. 2: 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Masner, L.. 1967. In Krombein, K.V., and Burks, B.D. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea in Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S.D.A. Agric. Monogr. 2. Second Supplement, pp. 285–305.Google Scholar
Nees, C.G. 1834. Hymenopterorum Ichneumonibus affinium Monographiae, Genera Europaea et Species illustrantes. Vol. 1, 2. Stuttgart and Tubingen. 1834.Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E.J. 1980. Diapriidae (Diapriinae) Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea. Handb. Ident. Brit. Insects 8(3). 55 pp.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1881. Fauna Canadienne, Les Insectes Hyménoptères. Naturaliste can. 12(No. 141): 241–269.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1885–1889. Additions et corrections au volume II de la faune entomologique du Canada traitant des hyménoptères. C. Darveau, Québec. 475 pp.Google Scholar
Szabo, J.B. 1961. Neue paläarktische Gattungen und Arten der Diapriiden in der Sammlung des Ungarischen Wissenschaftlichen Museums (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Diapriidae). Ann. Hist. Nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 53: 491–494.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1858. Sverges Proctotruper. Öfv. Ak. Förh. 15: 359–380.Google Scholar
Tomsik, B. 1947. Rod Spilomicrus Westw. (Hym. Proctotr.). Ent. Listy. 10: 33–43.Google Scholar
Westwood, J.O. 1832. Descriptions of several new British forms amongst the Parasitic Hymenopterous Insects. London and Edinburgh Phil. Mag. & J. Sci. 1: 127–129.Google Scholar