Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:52:56.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concurrent models and cross-linguistic analogies in the study of prepositional stranding in French in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2011

RICARDO OTHEGUY
RICARDO OTHEGUY*
Affiliation:
Graduate Center, City University of New Yorkrotheguy@gc.cuny.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Prepositions can be found with and without adjacent complements in many forms of popular spoken French. The alternation appears in main clauses (il veut pas payer pour ça ~ il veut pas payer pour “he doesn't want to pay for [it]”) and, though with a more restricted social and geographic distribution, in relative clauses (j'avais pas personne avec qui parler ~ j'avais pas personne à parler avec “I had no one to whom to talk ~ I had no one to talk to”). In main clauses, the variant lacking the adjacent complement is said to have an orphaned preposition (il veut pas payer pour); in relatives, it is said to have a stranded preposition (j'avais pas personne à parler avec). In popular spoken French in Canada, stranding appears to be much more frequent than in other Francophone areas. Because so many French speakers in Canada are bilingual, because of the high frequency of stranding, and no doubt also because stranding violates prescriptive norms, stranded prepositions in French in Canada are widely believed to be instances of English influence (e.g. j'avais pas personne à parler avec is regarded as modeled on I had no one to talk to). But in a masterly variationist treatment, Poplack, Zentz and Dion (2011, this issue) argue that Canadian stranding is not of English origin. Stranded Canadian prepositions represent, instead, the expansion to relative clauses of the ordinary main-clause orphans. The historical source for Canadian stranding is thus analogy-induced and internal (French orphans), not contact-induced and external (not English stranding).

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 226 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lapidus, N., & Otheguy, R. (2005). Overt nonspecific ellos in Spanish in New York. Spanish in Context, 2, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R. (1995). When contact speakers talk, linguistic theory listens. In Contini-Morava, E. & Sussman, B. Goldberg (eds.), Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory, pp. 213–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R. (2011). Functional adaptation and conceptual convergence in the analysis of language contact in the Spanish of bilingual communities in New York. In Díaz-Campos, M. A. (ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics, pp. 504–529. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Stern, N. (2011). On so-called Spanglish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A. C. (2011). Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., Zentella, A. C., & Livert, D. (2007). Language and dialect contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language, 83, 770–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., & Levey, S. (2010). Contact induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In Auer, P. & Schmidt, J. (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, pp. 391–418. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. (2001). African American English in the diaspora: Tense and aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Zentz, L., & Dion, N. (2011). Phrase-final prepositions in Quebec French: An empirical study of contact, code-switching and resistance to convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728911000204. Published by Cambridge University Press, 11 August 2011.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, pp. 729–763. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar