Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:13:18.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paramedic Electrocardiogram and Rhythm Identification: A Convenient Training Device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Peggy Hale*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Doctor’s Hospital/OUCOM, Columbus, Ohio USA
Robert Lowe
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Doctor’s Hospital/OUCOM, Columbus, Ohio USA
Jason P. Seamon
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Doctor’s Hospital/OUCOM, Columbus, Ohio USA
James J. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Doctor’s Hospital/OUCOM, Columbus, Ohio USA
*
Correspondence: Dr. Peggy Hale, DO 5100 West Broad StreetColumbus, Ohio 42338 USA E-mail: phale2@ohiohealth.com

Abstract

Introduction: A common reason for utilizing local paramedics and the emergency medical services is for the recognition and immediate treatment of chest pain, a complaint that has multiple possible etiologies. While many of those complaining of disease processes responsible for chest pain are benign, some will be life-threatening and will require immediate identification and treatment. The ability of paramedics to not only perform field electrocardiograms (ECGs), but to accurately diagnose various unstable cardiac rhythms has shown significant reduction in time to specific treatments. Increasing the overall accuracy of ECG interpretation by paramedics has the potential to facilitate early and appropriate treatment and decrease patient morbidity and mortality.

Methods: A convenient training device (flip book) on ambulances and in common areas in the fire station could improve field interpretation of certain cardiac rhythms. This training device consists of illustrated sample ECG tracings and their associated diagnostic criteria. The goal was to enhance the recognition and interpretation of ECGs, and thereby, reduce delays in the initiation of treatment and potential complications associated with misinterpretation.

This study was a prospective, observational study using a matched pre-test/post-test design. The study period was from November 2008 to December 2008. A total of 136 paramedics were approached to participate in this study. A pre-test consisting of 15 12-lead ECGs was given to all paramedics who agreed to participate in the study. Once the pre-tests were completed, the flip books were placed in common areas. Approximately one month after the flip books were made available to the paramedics, a post-test was administered.

Statistical comparisons were made between the pre- and post-test scores for both the global test and each type of rhythm.

Results: Using these data, there were no statistically significant improvements in the global ECG interpretation or on individual rhythm interpretations.

Conclusions: A flip book with multiple ECG rhythms and definitions without the benefit of any outside support was not effective in improving paramedic identification of ECG rhythms on a post-test. Suggestions for further research include repeating the study with a larger sample size; utilizing a lecturer to explain how to use the flip book in the most efficient manner; reiterating how to read and interpret ECGs; and answering questions. Comparing test scores of paramedic students, and newly certified paramedics as opposed to veteran paramedics also may indicate that the flip books are more suited for one group over another.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright Hale © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Swor, R, Anderson, W, Jackson, R, et al: Effects of EMS transportation on time to diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Prehosp Disaster Med 1994;9(3):160164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, LJ, Brooks, S, Sawadsky, B, et al: Prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography impact on acute myocardial infarction treatment times and mortality: A systemic review. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:8489.Google Scholar
American Heart Association: 2005 Guidelines for CPR and ECC. Available at http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/.Google Scholar
Brown, LH, Gough, Hawley, CR: Accuracy of rural EMS provider interpretation of three-lead ECG rhythm strips. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997;1:259262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, R, Heller, M, Rosenau, A, et al: Paramedic interpretation of prehospital lead-II ST-segments. Prehosp Disast Med 1997;12(2):141144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitbread, M, Leah, V, Bell, T, et al: Recognition of ST elevation by paramedics. Emerg Med J 2002;19:6667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, JA, Brinsfield, K, Bernard, S, et al: Real-time paramedic compared with blinded physician identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results of an observation study. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:443448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubin, D: Rapid Interpretation of EKGs, 6th Edition. Hong Kong, 2000.Google Scholar
Nathanson, L, McClennen, S, Safran, C, Goldberger, AL: ECG Wave-Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. Available at http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu. Accessed monthly since May 2008.Google Scholar
May, MR, Dionne, R, Maloney, J, et al: Diagnostic performance and potential clinical impact of advanced care paramedic interpretation of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the field. Can J Emerg Med 2006;8(6):401407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, R: Teaching electrocardiogram interpretation. J Electrocardiol 2006;39:426429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberger, AL, Goldberger, E: Clinical Electrocardiology: A Simplified Approach, 5th ed.Boston, Massachusetts: Mosby, 1994.Google Scholar
Mattu, A, Brady, W: ECGs for the Emergency Physician, London, BMJ Books, 2003.Google Scholar