Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:14:21.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epistemic normativity from the reasoner's viewpoint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Joëlle Proust
Joëlle Proust
Affiliation:
Institut Jean-Nicod (EHESS-ENS), UMR CNRS 8129, Ecole Normale Supérieure, F-75005 Paris, France. jproust@ehess.frhttp://joelleproust.hautetfort.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elqayam & Evans (E&E) are focused on the normative judgments used by theorists to characterize subjects' performances (e.g. in terms of logic or probability theory). They ignore the fact, however, that subjects themselves have an independent ability to evaluate their own reasoning performance, and that this ability plays a major role in controlling their first-order reasoning tasks.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. & Cohen, J. D. (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control, Psychological Review 108(3):624–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broome, J. (1999) Normative requirements. Ratio 12:398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (2000) Norms, history, and the constitution of the mental. In: Perception, knowledge and belief. pp. 242–58. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T., Barston, J. L. & Pollard, P. (1983) On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory and Cognition 11:295–306.Google ScholarPubMed
Goel, V. & Dolan, R. J. (2003) Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition 87:B11–B22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houdé, O. & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003) Neural foundations of logical and mathematical cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4:507–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koriat, A. & Goldsmith, M. (1996) Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review 103(3):490–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osherson, D., Perani, D., Cappa, S., Schnur, T., Grassi, F. & Fazio, F. (1998) Distinct brain loci in deductive versus probabilistic reasoning. Neuropsychologia 36(4):369–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papineau, D. (1999) Normativity and judgment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 73:17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proust, J. (2009) Adaptive control loops as an intermediate mind-brain reduction basis. In: Reduction and elimination in philosophy of mind and philosophy of neuroscience, ed. Leitgeb, H. & Hieke, A., pp. 191–219. Ontos.Google Scholar
Proust, J. (in press) Mental acts as natural kinds. In: Decomposing the Will, ed. Vierkant, T., Clark, A. & Kiverstein, J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reverberi, C., Shallice, T., D'Agostinie, S., Skrape, M. & Bonatti, L. L. (2009) Cortical bases of elementary deductive reasoning: Inference, memory, and metadeduction. Neuropsychologia 47:1107–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E. & Washburn, D. A. (2003) The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26(3):317–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed