Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:42:58.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eric Raimy & Charles E. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology (Current Studies in Linguistics 48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. Pp. vi+418.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2011

Matthew Gordon
Matthew Gordon*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
*
Author's address:Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USAmgordon@linguistics.ucsb.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , November 2011 , pp. 730 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Calabrese, Andrea. 1988. Toward a theory of phonological alphabets. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2004. Syllable weight. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 277–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1971. A note on laryngeal features. Quarterly Progress Report 101, 198–213. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Research Laboratory of Electronics.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1980. Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1.1, 83–105.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20.2, 253–306.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1998. The proper treatment of optimality in computational phonology. In Karttunen, Lauri & Oflazer, Kemal (eds.), FSMNLP'98: The International Workshop on Finite State Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1–12. Ankara: Bilkent University. [ROA 258]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn & Maddieson, Ian. 1998. Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In Hyman, Larry M. & Li, Charles N. (eds.), Language, speech, and mind, 62–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian & Precoda, Karen. 1989. Updating UPSID. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 74, 104–111.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. 2008. Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority. Journal of Phonetics 36.1, 55–90.Google Scholar
Raimy, Eric. 2000. The phonology and morphology of reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1999. Licensing laryngeal features. UCLA Working Papers in Phonology 3, 25–146.Google Scholar
Vaysman, Olga. 2009. Segmental alternations and metrical theory. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie. 2002. The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution: Typological survey and formal analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar