Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:19:31.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malcom Coulthard & Alison Johnson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics). London: Routledge, 2010. Pp. xxvii+673.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2011

Raphael Salkie*
Affiliation:
University of Brighton
*
Author's address:School of Humanities, University of Brighton, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9PH, UKr.m.salkie@brighton.ac.uk

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bench-Capon, Trevor & Sartor, Giovanni. 2003. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artificial Intelligence 150.1–2, 97143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterill, Janet. 2000. Reading the rights: A cautionary tale of comprehension and comprehensibility. Forensic Linguistics 7.1, 426.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe C. 2005. Legal reasoning. In Holyoak, Keith J. & Morrison, Robert G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, 685703. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Michael S. 2003. Dworkin's fallacy, or what the philosophy of language can't teach us about the law. Virginia Law Review 89.8, 18971952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, John. 1988. Rumpole and the age of miracles. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Paul. 2007. Blackstone's police manual, 10th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slapper, Gary & Kelly, David. 2011. The English legal system, 12th edn.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2008. Interpreting legal texts: What is, and what is not, special about the law. In Soames, Scott, Philosophical essays, vol. 1, 403423. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sprack, John. 2006. A practical approach to criminal procedure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar