Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T00:23:47.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vowel change as systemic optimisation: why the New Zealand English front vowel shift is not a good example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2011

CHRISTIAN LANGSTROF*
Affiliation:
Englisches Seminar, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Rempartstrasse 15, 79085 Freiburg, GermanyChristian.langstrof@anglistik.uni-freiburg.de

Abstract

This article discusses the relation between articulatory features and phonetic properties in the light of a specific type of vowel change, namely a push-chain in the front vowel system of New Zealand English. Specifically, an idea put forward by Hawkins (1976), which claims that the NZE front vowel shift is an example of phonological optimisation in vowel systems, will be discussed in some detail. It will be argued, contra Hawkins, that the NZE front vowel shift is not a good example of phonological optimisation in vowel systems due to the existence of intermediate systems in the speech of individuals showing complex patterns of allophonisation, turning the idea of economy on its head.

Type
Squib
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, Laurie. 1979. The Second Great Vowel Shift. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 9 (2), 57–6.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1986. Notes on New Zealand English phonetics and phonology. English World-Wide 7, 225–8.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1992. The Second Great Vowel Shift revisited. English World-Wide 13 (2), 253–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris, Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Coleman, John. 1998. Phonological representations: Their names, forms, and powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John (ed.). 1995. The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jen, Maclagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea & Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New Zealand English: Its origin and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Peter. 1976. The role of NZ English in a binary feature analysis of English short vowels. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 6 (2), 50–6.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1961. The concept of the sound law and the teleological criterion. In Selected writings. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1909. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol. 1: Sounds and spelling. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
King, Robert. 1969. Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. The phonological basis of sound change. In Goldsmith, (ed.), 640–70.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langstrof, Christian. 2006. Acoustic evidence for a push-chain shift in the intermediate period of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 18, 141–64.Google Scholar
Langstrof, Christian. 2009. On the role of vowel duration in the New Zealand English front vowel shift. Language Variation and Change 21, 437–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1976. English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1980. On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maclagan, Margaret. 1982. An acoustic study of New Zealand English vowels. The New Zealand Speech Therapists’ Journal 37 (1), 20–6.Google Scholar
Maclagan, Margaret & Jen, Hay. 2007. Getting fed up with our feet: Contrast maintenance and the New Zealand English ‘short’ front vowel shift. Language Variation and Change 19, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, April. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques: traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Wells, John. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar