Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:34:06.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon Nanotube Growth on Different Types of Tool Steel Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Gulfem Ipek Nasuf
Affiliation:
gulfem@siu.edu, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Materials Technology Center, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, College of Engineering, Carbondale, IL, 62901, United States
Max Yen
Affiliation:
myen@siu.edu, Materials Technology Center, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, 62901, United States
Get access

Abstract

This paper investigates the effectiveness of different pretreatment methods applied on M50, M35, and W4 type of tool steel substrates for direct growth of carbon nanotubes. The pretreatments explored include treatment with sand paper polishing, nitric acid (HNO3) etching, and high temperature hydrogen gas treatment. Furthermore, in order to establish a correlation between the steel surface average roughness value and the carbon nanotube growth, surface topography of steel substrates created by mechanical polishing were measured before actual growth process. Grown carbon nanostructures were shown by SEM and TEM to be multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and vapor grown carbon nanofibers (VGCFs). It was found that under the same pretreatment conditions, even when the same roughness values were achieved and the same thermal chemical vapor deposition conditions were applied, grown nanostructures on different types of tool steel substrates showed dissimilarity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dai, H., “Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, integration, and properties”, Acc. Chem. Res., vol. 35, pp.10351044, 2002.Google Scholar
2. Dillion, A. C., Jones, K. M., Bekkedahl, T. A. et al. , “Storage of hydrogen in single-walled carbon nanotubes”, Nature, vol. 386, pp.377379, 1997.Google Scholar
3. Cheung, C. L., Hafner, J. H., Odom, T. W. et al. , “Growth and fabrication with single-walled carbon nanotube probe microscopy tips”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, pp. 3136–38, 2000.Google Scholar
4. Harris, P. J. F., “Carbon nanotube composites”, International Materials Reviews, vol. 49, pp.3143, 2004.Google Scholar
5. Reo, S. G., Huang, L., Setyawan, W. et al. , “Nanotube electronics: Large-scale assembly of carbon nanotubes”, Nature, vol. 425, pp.36–27, 2003.Google Scholar
6. Reddy, N. K., Meunier, J., Coulombe, S., “Growth of nanotubes directly on a nickel surface by thermal CVD”, Materials Letters, vol. 60, pp.37613765, 2006.Google Scholar
7. Park, D., Kim, Y. H., Lee, J. K., “Pretreatment of stainless steel substrate surface for the growth of carbon nanotubes by PECVD”, Journal of Materials Science, vol. 38, pp.49334939, 2003.Google Scholar
8. Karwa, M., Iqbal, Z., Mitra, S., “Scaled up self assembly of carbon nanotubes inside long stainless steel tubing”, Carbon, vol. 44, pp.12351242, 2006.Google Scholar
9. ASM INTERNATIONAL Handbook Committee. “Metals Handbookfl ASM International. vol. 1, 10th ed., pp 758, 19.Google Scholar