Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T17:50:13.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Diversity Damage Social Capital? A Comparative Study of Neighbourhood Diversity and Social Capital in the US and Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

Edward Fieldhouse*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
David Cutts*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
*
Edward Fieldhouse, Institute for Social Change, University of Manchester, ed.fieldhouse@manchester.ac.uk.
David Cutts, Institute for Social Change, University of Manchester, david.cutts@manchester.ac.uk.

Abstract

Abstract. A number of scholars have noted a negative relationship between ethnic diversity and social capital or social trust, especially in the US. Evidence from other countries has been more mixed and sometimes contradictory. In this paper we provide the first Anglo-American comparative analysis of the relationship between neighbourhood diversity and social capital, and show how this relationship varies across ethnic categories. We apply multilevel structural equation models to individual level data from the 2000 Citizen Benchmark Survey for the US and the 2005 Citizenship Survey for Great Britain. The findings suggest that while for attitudinal social capital among Whites the negative underlying relationship with diversity is apparent in both countries, the effect is much weaker or reversed for minority groups. For structural social capital the negative relationship is apparent for minorities but not Whites, but this is mainly attributable to other neighbourhood characteristics.

Résumé. Un certain nombre d'universitaires ont noté une relation négative entre la diversité ethnique et le capital social ou la confiance sociale, surtout aux États-Unis. D'autres pays, par contre, offrent des constats plus mitigés et parfois contradictoires. Dans cet article, nous présentons la première analyse comparative anglo-américaine de la relation entre la diversité du voisinage et le capital social et nous démontrons comment cette relation varie selon les catégories ethniques. Nous appliquons des modélisations par équation structurelle à multiniveaux à des données de niveau individuel provenant du Citizen Benchmark Survey de 2000 pour les États-Unis et du Citizenship Survey de 2005 pour la Grande-Bretagne. Les résultats démontrent que si, pour le capital social attitudinal, la relation fondamentale négative avec la diversité est évidente parmi les Blancs dans les deux pays, l'effet est cependant beaucoup plus faible ou renversé pour les groupes minoritaires. En ce qui concerne le capital social structurel, la relation négative est évidente pour les minorités, mais pas pour les Blancs, mais cette situation est principalement attribuable à d'autres caractéristiques du voisinage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aizlewood, Amanda and Pendakur, Ravi. 2005. “Ethnicity and Social Capital in Canada.” Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal 37 (2): 77103.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and La Ferrara, Eliana. 2000. “Who Trusts Others?Journal of Public Economics 85 (2): 207–34.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon. W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. and Paskeviciute, Aida. 2006. “How Ethnic and Linguistic Heterogeneity Influence the Prospects for Civil Society: A Comparative Study of Citizenship Behavior.” The Journal of Politics 68 (4): 783802.Google Scholar
Berry, John. 1997. “Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation.” Applied Psychology: An International Review 46 (1): 568.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert Morse Jr.. 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, Timothy, Welch, Susan, Sigelman, Lee and Combs, Michael. 1995. “Residential Context and Racial Solidarity among African Americans.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 434–58.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1954. “What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review 19 (1): 310.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. Richardson, John G.. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bowyer, Benjamin. 2009. “The Contextual Determinants of Whites' Racial Attitudes in England.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 559–86.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 2006. Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape Our Civic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom, Putnam, Robert and Fieldhouse, Edward. 2010. The Age of Obama: The Changing Place of Minorities in British and American Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Karen S. 2005. “Networks, Norms and Trust: The Social Psychology of Social Capital.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 414.Google Scholar
Costa, Dora. L. and Kahn, Matthew E.. 2003. “Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist's Perspective.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (1): 103–11.Google Scholar
Delhey, Jan and Newton, Kenneth. 2005. “Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?European Sociological Review 21 (4): 311–27.Google Scholar
Fennema, Meindert and Tillie, Jean. 1999. “Political Participation and political trust in Amsterdam: Civic communities and ethnic networks.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 25 (4): 703–26Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, Edward and Cutts, David. 2008a. “Mobilisation or Marginalisation? Neighbourhood Effects on Muslim Electoral Registration in Britain in 2001.” Political Studies 56: 333–54.Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, Edward and Cutts, David. 2008b. “Diversity, density and turnout: The effect of neighbourhood ethno-religious composition on voter turnout in Britain.” Political Geography 27 (5): 530–48.Google Scholar
Finney, Nissa and Simpson, Ludi. 2009. Sleepwalking to Segregation? Challenging Myths about Race and Migration. London: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael and Evans, Arthur. 1985. “External Threat, Perceived Threat and Group Identity.” Social Science Quarterly 66 (1): 5066.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward, Laibson, David, Scheinkman, José and Soutter, Christine. 2000. “Measuring Trust.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 811–46.Google Scholar
Guterbock, Thomas M. and London, Bruce. 1983. “Race, Political Orientation and Participation: An Empirical Test of Four Competing Theories.” American Sociological Review 48 (4): 439–53.Google Scholar
Halpern, David 2005. Social Capital. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Helliwell, John and Putnam, Robert. 2007. “Education and Social Capital.” Eastern Economic Journal 33: 119.Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney E. 2007. Social Capital and Racial Diversity: Equality and Community in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc. 2007. “Social Capital and Diversity Generalized Trust, Social Cohesion and Regimes of Diversity.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 40 (3): 709–32.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc, Reeskens, Tim, Stolle, Dietlind and Trappers, Ann. 2009. “Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe: A Cross-National Multi-level Study.” Comparative Political Studies 42: 198223.Google Scholar
Hu, Li-tze and Bentler, Peter. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Convariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6(1): 155.Google Scholar
Kesler, Christel and Bloemraad, Irene. 2010. “Does Immigration Erode Social Capital? The Conditional Effects of Immigration-generated Diversity on Trust, Membership and Participation across 19 Countries, 1981–2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 319347.Google Scholar
Lancee, Bram and Dronkers, Jaap. 2008. “Ethnic diversity in neighbourhoods and individual trust of immigrants and natives: A replication of Putnam (2007) in a West-European country.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Theoretical Perspectives on Social Cohesion and Social Capital, Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts, Brussels.Google Scholar
Laurence, James and Heath, Anthony. 2008. Predictors of community cohesion: Multi-level modeling of the 2005 citizenship survey. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Leigh, Andrew. 2006. “Trust, Inequality and Ethnic Heterogeneity.” The Economic Record 82 (258): 268–80.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan. 2001. Strength in Numbers? The Political Mobilization of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan and Vedlitz, Arnold. 1999. “Race, ethnicity and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations.” Journal of Politics 61 (4): 10921114.Google Scholar
Letki, Natalia. 2008. “Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods.” Political Studies 56: 99126.Google Scholar
Marschall, Melissa and Stolle, Dietlind. 2004. “Race and the City: Neighbourhood Context and the Development of Generalized Trust.” Political Behavior 26 (2): 125–53.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn and Cook, James. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44.Google Scholar
Muthén, Linda. and Muthén, Bengt. 2007. Mplus Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User's Guide. 5th ed.Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Oliver, Eric J. 2001. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela 1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (1): 88127.Google Scholar
Pennant, R. 2005. Diversity, Trust and Community Participation in England. Home Office Findings 253. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas and Tropp, Linda. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Inter-Group Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–83.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 124.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Rumbaut, Rubén. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Civic Engagement in a Diverse and Changing Society.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137–74.Google Scholar
Schlichting, Kurt, Tuckel, Peter and Maisel, Richard. 1998. “Racial Segregation and Voter Turnout in America.” Amercian Politics Research 26 (2): 218–36.Google Scholar
Shingles, Richard D. 1981. “Black Consciousness and Political Participation: The Missing Link.” American Political Science Review 75 (1): 7691.Google Scholar
Simpson, Ludi. 2004. “Statistics of Racial Segregation: Measures, Evidence and Policy.” Urban Studies 41 (3): 661–81.Google Scholar
Skrondal, Anders and Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia. 2004. Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models. Boca Raton FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind and Hooghe, Marc. 2005. “Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 149–68.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Oudenhoven, Jan Pieter, Prins, Karin and Buunk, Bram. 1998. “Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants.” European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 9951013.Google Scholar