Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T05:44:33.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonetics and phonology of Cuzco Quechua declarative intonation: An instrumental analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2009

Erin O'Rourke
Erin O'Rourke*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Pittsburgheorourke@pitt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper offers an analysis of Cuzco Quechua intonation using experimental techniques to examine one of the acoustic cues of pitch, the fundamental frequency or F0. While previous descriptions in the literature are based on auditory impression, in the present study recordings were made of read declaratives produced by native Quechua speakers in Cuzco, Peru. This paper provides an initial characterization of high and low tones with respect to the stressed syllable, as well as information regarding the height and alignment of these tones. In addition, the intonational marking of intermediate phrases within an utterance is discussed. Research on Quechua intonation can be used to begin to address several issues regarding the intonation of languages in contact, as well as to provide data for a future cross-linguistic analysis of indigenous language intonation features.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 291 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, Amado. 1940. La interpretación araucana de Lenz para la pronunciación chilena. In Alonso, Amado & Lida, Raimundo (eds.), El español de Chile, 279–289. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Atterer, Michaela & Ladd, D. Robert. 2004. On the phonetics and phonology of ‘segmental anchoring’ of F0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics 32, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2008. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.0.42) http://www.praat.org/ (12 December 2008).Google Scholar
Calvo Pérez, Julio. 1993. Pragmática y gramática del quechua cuzqueño (Monumenta lingüística andina). Cuzco, Peru: Centro de Estudios Regionales ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1987. Lingüística quechua. Cuzco, Peru: Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1994. Quechumara: Estructuras paralelas de las lenguas quechua y aimara (Cuadros de investigación 42). La Paz, Bolivia: Centro de Investigación y Promoción del Campesinado.Google Scholar
Chirinos Rivera, Andrés (tr.). 1999. Perumanta hatun kamachina: Constitución política del Perú, 1993. Lima, Peru: Fondo Editorial del Congreso de la República del Perú.Google Scholar
Chirinos Rivera, Andrés. 2001. Atlas lingüístico del Perú (Estudios Urbanoregionales 6). Cuzco, Peru: Ministerio de Educación, Centro de Estudios Regionales ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Gurlekian, Jorge. 2004. Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7 (2), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua (Lingua Descriptive Studies 5). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 2007. Intonational diglossia: A case study of Glasgow. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonio, Cusihuamán G.. 1976. Gramática quechua Cuzco-Collao. Lima, Peru: Ministerio de Educación, Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Antonio, Cusihuamán G.. 2001. Gramática quechua Cuzco-Collao, 2nd edn. Cuzco, Peru: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’.Google Scholar
de la Mota Gorriz, Carme. 1997. Prosody of sentences with contrastive new information in Spanish. In Botinis, Antonis, Kouroupetroglou, Georgios & Carayiannis, George (eds.), Intonation: Theory, models and applications. The ESCA Workshop, Athens, Greece, 75–78.Google Scholar
Elordieta, Gorka. 2003. The Spanish intonation of speakers of a Basque pitch-accent dialect. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2, 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, Timothy L. 2001. Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, Juan M., Llisterri, Joaquim, de la Mota, Carme, Marín, Rafael & Ríos, Antonio. 1995. Estudio comparado de las características prosódicas de la oración simple en español en dos modalidades de lectura. In Elejabeitia, Ana & Iribar, Alexander (eds.), Phonetica: Trabajos de fonética experimental (Serie Lingüística 6), 173–194. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2005. Intonational phonology of Chicasaw. In Jun (ed.), 301–330.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2005. Transcription of Dutch intonation. In Jun (ed.), 118–145.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Teeuw, Renske. 2008. A moraic and a syllabic H-tone in Yucatec Maya. In Esther, Herrera Z. & Butrageño, Pedro Martin (eds.), Fonología instrumental: Patrones fónicos y variación, 49–71. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Henríquez Ureña, Pedro. 1938. El español en Méjico, los Estados Unidos, y la América Central. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Hintz, Diane M. 2006. Stress in South Conchucos Quechua: A phonetic and phonological study. International Journal of American Linguistics 72, 477–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy. 1987. Bilingual education success, but policy failure. Language in Society 16, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2003a. From phrase-final to post-initial accent in Western Basque. In Fikkert, Paula & Jacobs, Haike (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 249–281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2003b. Remarks on the diachronic reconstruction of intonational patterns in Romance with special attention to Occitan as a bridge language. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2, 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Prosodic typology. In Jun (ed.), 430–458.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.). 2005a. Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. 1973. Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: Implications for models of pitch perception. Journal Acoustic Society of America 53 (1), 8–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klee, Carol A. 2001. Historical perspectives of Spanish–Quechua contact in Peru. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 20 (1), 167–181.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennes, Mietta. 2006. Draw_f0_curves_from_files.praat. http://www.helsinki.fi/~lennes/praat-scripts/ (28 March 2008).Google Scholar
Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1987. Estudios sobre el español de yucatán. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bértil. 1948. L'español dans le nouveau monde: Probléme de linguistique générale. Studia Linguistica 1, 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 1991. Language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Erin E. 2005. Intonation and language contact: A case study of two varieties of Peruvian Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Parker, Gary John. 1969. Ayacucho Quechua grammar and dictionary. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1979. The perception of fundamental frequency declination. Journal Acoustic Society of America 66 (2), 363–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Shih, Chilin & Nibert, Holly. 1996. Pitch downtrend in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 24, 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queen, Robin Michelle. 1996. Intonation in contact: A study of Turkish–German bilingual intonation patterns. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Sadat-Tehrani, Nima. 2007. The intonational grammar of Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Sadat-Tehrani, Nima. 2009. The alignment of L+H* pitch accents in Persian intonation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39 (2), 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanez Flórez, David I. 1996. Gramática del quechua del Qosqo. Cuzco, Peru: Academia Mayor de la Lengua Quechua, Instituto Nacional de Cultura.Google Scholar
Simonet, Miguel. 2008. Language contact in Majorca: An experimental sociophonetic approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Sosa, Juan Manuel. 1999. La entonación del español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2002. Upstep and embedded register levels. Phonology 19, 77–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welby, Pauline. 2006. French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment. Journal of Phonetics 34, 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Erik W. 2003. The intonational system of Dominican Spanish: Findings and analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Wölke, Wolfgang. 1973. Especificación y foco en quechua (Documento de trabajo No. 4). Lima, Peru: CILA, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.Google Scholar