Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:49:25.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laura J. Downing (2006). Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 12.) Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. x+284.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Adam Ussishkin
Adam Ussishkin
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 363 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dresher, B. Elan & van der Hulst, Harry (1998). Head–dependent asymmetries in phonology: complexity and visibility. Phonology 15. 317–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word 10. 210–234. Reprinted in Martin Joos (ed.) (1966). Readings in linguistics I. 4th edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1986). Prosodic morphology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Brandeis University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1993). Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms, University of Massachusetts & Rutgers University. Available as ROA-482 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. NELS 24. 333–379.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Revithiadou, Anthi (1999). Headmost accent wins: head dominance and ideal prosodic form in lexical accent systems. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Russell, Kevin (1997). Optimality Theory and morphology. In Archangeli, Diana & Langendoen, D. Terry (eds.) Optimality Theory: an overview. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 102–133.Google Scholar
Spring, Cari (1990). Implications of Axininca Campa for prosodic morphology and reduplication. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Urbanczyk, Suzanne (1996). Patterns of reduplication in Lushootseed. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Ussishkin, Adam (2000). The emergence of fixed prosody. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Ussishkin, Adam (2005). A fixed prosodic theory of nonconcatenative templatic morphology. NLLT 23. 169–218.Google Scholar