Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:35:25.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of a Model of Ecological Succession to Conservation and Land-use Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Diane B. Rosenberg  and
Stephen M. Freedman
Diane B. Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Loyola University of Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA
Stephen M. Freedman
Affiliation:
Departments of Natural Science and Biology, Loyola University of Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ecological succession theory can be used in land-use planning to develop self-maintaining systems that meet conservation needs. This paper presents a management succession model and outlines methods that can be applied to regional land-use, rangeland, and agro-ecosystem, management. Traditionally, succession has been viewed as a repeatable and deterministic change in an ecosystem. Unlike the traditional view, the management succession model suggests that the successional process can be regulated to develop management designed communities. The model is based on current succession theory and consists of five steps; designed disturbance, selective colonization, inhibitory persistence, removal, and regeneration. Through the steps of the model, community interactions, life-history characteristics, and those abiotic factors that are to some extent controllable, are manipulated. The objective in manipulating these factors is to regulate successional sequences and rates of species replacement.

To implement these steps a management practice, such as burning, can be used as a designed disturbance. The timing, intensity, and extent, of burning are regulated to insure that ‘selected colonizers’ become established. The design of the disturbance, and the selection of species and proportions of colonizers, is based upon the type of community structure that is wanted. Often a stable, persisting community is the goal. How long a community persists can be controlled by planned removal, which deliberately interrupts a successional sequence. The removal process can, in itself, be considered a type of disturbance, and can be used to regulate subsequent successional sequences and rates of replacement. In some instances a regenerating community is the goal, and management efforts can be adjusted to prevent successional sequences from occurring.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Winter 1984 , pp. 323 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J.E. & Holte, K.E. (1981). Vegetation development over 25 years without grazing on sagebrush-dominated rangeland in southeastern Idaho. J. Range Manage., 34, pp. 25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K.L., Smith, E.F. & Owensby, C.E. (1970). Burning bluestem range. J. Range Manage., 23, pp. 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, C.E. (1980). Effects of plant density and diversity on the population dynamics of a specialist herbivore, the Striped Cucumber-beetle, Acalymma vittata. Ecology, 61, pp. 1515–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, M.G., Burk, J.H. & Pitts, W.D. (1980). Terrestrial Plant Ecology. The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, California, USA: xi + 604 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Blais, J.R. (1954). The recurrence of Spruce Budworm infestation in the past century in the Sac Seul area of northwestern Ontario. Ecology, 35, pp. 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, W.B., (1981). Human Ecosystems. Macmillan Publishing Co., NY, USA: xii + 419 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Clements, F.E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC, USA: Publ. No. 242: xiii + 512, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, F.E. (1936). Nature and structure of the climax. J. Ecology, 24, pp. 252–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J.H. & Slatyer, R.O. (1977). Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat., 111, pp. 1119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G.W. & Atkins, M.D. (1979). Agricultural Ecology. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, California, USA: v + 721 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cromartie, W.J. (1975). The effects of stand-size and vegetational background on the colonization of cruciferous plants by herbivorous insects. J. Appl. Ecol., 12, pp. 517–33.Google Scholar
Dasmann, R.F. (1984). Environmental Conservation, 5th edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA: x + 486 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dasmann, R.F. & Mossman, A.S. (1962). Abundance and population structure of wild ungulates in some areas of Southern Rhodesia. J. Wildlife Manage., 26, pp. 262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K., Robbilliard, G.A., Paine, R.T. & Dayton, L.B. (1974). Biological accommodation in the benthic community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Ecol. Monog., 44, pp. 105–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, M.I. & Bokhari, U.G. (1976). Plant-animal interactions: Studies on the effect of grasshopper grazing on Blue Grama Grass. Ecology, 57, pp. 762–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egler, F.E. (1958). Science, industry, and the abuse of the rights of way. Science, 127, pp. 573–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emden, H.F. Van (1965). The effect of uncultivated land on the distribution of Cabbage Aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) on an adjacent crop. J. Appl. Ecol., 2, pp. 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, S.M. & Rosenberg, D.B. (in press). An ecological succession model. International J. Environ. Studies.Google Scholar
Grubb, P.J. (1977). The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev., 52, pp. 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyder, D.N., Bement, R.E., Remmenga, E.E. & Terwilliger, C. (1966). Vegetation-soils and vegetation-grazing relations from frequency data. J. Range Manage., 19, pp. 11–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCracken, J.G. & Hansen, R.M. (1981). Diets of domestic sheep and other large herbivores in south-central Colorado. J. Range Manage., 34, pp. 242–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, C.E. & Smith, R.C. (1967). Undisturbed rhododendron thickets are not spreading. J. Forestry, 65, pp. 334–5.Google Scholar
Menke, J.W. & Trlica, M.J. (1981). Carbohydrate reserve, phenology, and growth-cycles of nine Colorado range species. J. Range Manage., 34, pp. 269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niering, W.A. & Egler, F.E. (1955). A shrub community of Viburnum lentago stable for twenty-five years. Ecology, 36, pp. 356–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niering, W A. & Goodwin, R.H. (1974). Creation of relatively stable shrublands with herbicides; arresting ‘succession’ on the rights-of-way and pastureland. Ecology, 55, pp. 784–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrides, G.A. (1975). Principal foods versus preferred foods and their relation to stocking rate and range condition. Biol. Conserv., 7, pp. 161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polunin, N. (1936). Plant succession in Norwegian Lapland. Journal of Ecology, xxiv, pp. 372–91, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polunin, N. (1960). Introduction to Plant Geography and Some Related Sciences. Longmans, London, England, UK: xix + 640 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, C.E. & Egler, F.E. (1954). Brush control in southeastern New York: Fifteen years of stable tree-less communities. Ecology, 34, pp. 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, P.O., Leinweber, C.L. & Merrill, L.B. (1974). Response of Sideoats Grama to animal saliva and thiamine. J. Range Manage., 27, pp. 400–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, S. (1980). The population dynamics of several herbivorous beetles in a tropical agro-ecosystem: the effect of intercropping corn, beans, and squash, in Costa Rica. J. Appl. Ecol., 17, pp. 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R.K. (1972). The production by roots of Calluna vulgaris of a factor inhibiting to growth of some mycorrhizal Fungi. J. Ecology, 60, pp. 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, D. (1981). Overgrazed and undermanaged. Environment, 23, pp. 37–9.Google Scholar
Sousa, W.P. (1979). Experimental investigations of disturbance and ecological succession in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol. Monog., 49, pp. 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahvanainen, J.O. & Root, R.B. (1972). The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia, 10, pp. 321–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SirTansley, A.G. (1947). Introduction to Plant Ecology, edn. 2. Allen & Unwin, Museum Street, London, England, UK: 260 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
SirTansley, A.G. (1949). The British Isles and Their Vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: vol. I, xxxviii + 484 pp., illustr.; vol. II, xxviii + 446 pp., illustr. (reprint with corrections of 1939 original).Google Scholar
Taylor, R.D. & Walklr, B.H. (1978). Comparison of vegetation use and herbivore biomass on a Rhodesian game and cattle ranch. J. Appl. Ecol., 15, pp. 565–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.C.R. (1974). A hypothesis to explain outbreaks of looper caterpillars, with special reference to population of Selidosema suavis on a plantation of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Oecologia, 39, pp. 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar