Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:56:49.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to W. J. Barry & J. Trouvain, Do we need a symbol for a central open vowel? JIPA 38 (2008), 349–357

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Martin J. Ball
Martin J. Ball*
Affiliation:
Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Louisiana at Lafayettemjball@louisiana.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I leave to others the argument as to whether there is sufficient justification to add a central open vowel symbol to the IPA. Rather, in this response, I would like to comment on the various proposals for what such a symbol should be outlined in Barry & Trouvain (2008). I will not be following the original ordering of suggestions in the article, but start with the proposals to redefine current symbols.

Type
The International Phonetic Alphabet
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 233 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, William J. & Trouvain, Jürgen. 2008. Do we need a symbol for a central open vowel? Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38 (3), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar