Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T10:02:02.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PROVINCIAL NEWSPAPERS AS A HISTORICAL SOURCE: BÜYÜK CİHAD AND THE GREAT STRUGGLE FOR THE MUSLIM TURKISH NATION (1951–53)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

Extract

Employing rhetoric all too familiar to Turks today, major metropolitan newspapers in Turkey in December 1952 and January 1953 raised the specter of widespread Islamic or religious “reaction” (irtica). Staunch defenders of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's policy of secularism, or laiklik, journalists in Istanbul and Ankara identified the existence of a “black press” (kara basın) manipulated by religious “reactionaries” (mürteci) determined to use print media to challenge the very secular foundations of the modern Turkish nation and to upset the established order. To prevent this, the time had come to prosecute vigorously both individuals and organizations that used newspapers or journals to exploit religion and promote obscurantist propaganda. Chief among these was not a metropolitan publication but, rather, an incendiary religious newspaper produced in the Black Sea city of Samsun—the very same city in which Mustafa Kemal had first set foot in 1919 in his efforts to lead what became the Turkish War of Independence. This black newspaper was Büyük Cihad, “The Great Struggle.”

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Author's note: I thank my colleague John Laband and three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

1 See, for instance, Vatan, 24 and 31 December 1952, and a publication, Malatya Suikastının İç Yüzü (The Truth about the Malatya Assassination Plot), written by G. Ozansoy and H. Cemal Beydeşman and published by Vatan (n.d.).

2 Cumhuriyet, 23 and 26 December 1952. For Yalman's own account of events, see his Yakın Tarihte Gördüklerim ve Geçirdiklerim (1945–1970) (The Things I Saw and Experienced in Recent History [1945–1970]) (Istanbul: Yenilik Basımevi, 1970), 275–300. Long after the fact, Hüseyin Üzmez also published his own account: Malatya Suiktası (Istanbul: Timaş Yayınları, 1999).

3 See Büyük Cihad, 5, 12, and 19 December 1952. See also Vicdan Sesi (Samsun), 10 December 1952, and Yeşil Nur (Eskişehir) 19 December 1952.

4 Mitchell, Richard, The Society of Muslim Brothers (London: Oxford University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Teitelbaum, Joshua, “The Muslim Brotherhood and ‘The Struggle for Syria,’ 1947–1958: Between Accommodation and Ideology,” Middle Eastern Studies 40 (2004): 134–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Boulby, Marion, The Muslim Brotherhood and the Kings of Jordan, 1945–1993 (Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

5 Kupferschmidt, Uri M., “Literacy, Illiteracy and Censorship in the Tradition of the Muslim Brotherhood,” in Printing and Publishing in the Middle East, ed. Sadgrove, Philip (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 165–84Google Scholar.

6 It is discussed only briefly in the basic political histories of the period: Karpat, Kemal, Turkey's Politics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1959)Google Scholar; Ahmad, Feroz, The Turkish Experiment in Democracy 1950–1975 (London: C. Hurst & Co., 1977)Google Scholar.

7 For a critique of this, see Brockett, Gavin, “Revisiting the Turkish Revolution, 1923–1938: Secular Reform and Religious ‘Reaction,’History Compass 3 (2006): 1060–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 This is particularly evident in terms of the modern nation–state in the Middle East; historians of the late Ottoman Empire have used extensively newspapers and journals produced in many provincial capitals.

9 To date, analysis of the press during the single-party period is very sparse. The most important statistical source is Tülbentçi, Feridün, Cumhuriyetten Sonra Çıkan Gazeteler ve Mecmualar: 29 İlkteşrin 1923–31 İlkkanun 1940 (Newspapers and Journals Printed in Turkey Since the Republic [October 1923–December 1940]) (Istanbul: Başvekâlet Matbuat, 1941)Google Scholar.

10 Between 1871 and 1880 only four serials were published in Ankara. See Haluk Duman, “Anadoluʾda Türkçe Basın (1867–1922)” (The Turkish Press in Anatolia), Müteferrika Yaz, no. 13 (1998): 75–92.

11 Statistics are based on Türkiye Bibliyografyası, 1952. Türkiyeʾde Çıkmakta Bulunan Gazete ve Mecmualar (Newspapers and Journals in Print in Turkey) (Istanbul: Başvekâlet Matbuat Umum Müdürlüğü, 1945).

12 For further discussion of the contribution of the provincial press to the emerging national print culture, see Gavin Brockett, “Provincial Newspapers, Print Culture and the Framing of the Turkish Nation, 1945–1954,” Printing and Publishing in the Middle East, 207–32.

13 Although political histories of the period do address this debate, the actual newspapers and journals remain to be studied in any depth. Leftist publications included not only the better-known Tan, Görüşler, Marko Paşa, Yeni Dünya, and La Turquie but also Gün, Gerçek, and Sendika in 1946; Zincirli Hürriyet in 1947 and 1948; Hür Gençlik in 1947; Baştan in 1948 and Yeni Baştan in 1950; Beşer in 1949; Nazim Hikmet in 1950; and Nuhun Gemisi in 1949–50. Pan-Turkist publications included Çınaraltı in 1948, Yeni Bozkurt in 1948, Tanrıdağ in 1950, and Orkun in 1950–52.

14 Ismail Kara, “Cumhuriyet Türkiyesiʾnde Dini Yayıncılığın Gelişimi Üzerine Birkaç Not” (The Development of Religious Publishing in the Republic of Turkey), Toplum ve Bilim, 29–30 (1985): 153–78. The government also used school texts to stress its own version of Turkish-Islamic history. See Salmoni, Barak, “Islam in Turkish Pedagogic Attitudes and Education Materials: 1923–1950,” Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 24, no. 2 (2002): 2361Google Scholar.

15 Türkmen, Hamza, “Hareket Dergisi (1939–1982)” (The Magazine Hareket [1939–1982]), in İslamcılık (Istanbul: İletişim, 2004), 715–20Google Scholar.

16 Caner Arabacı, “Eşref Edib Fergan ve Sebilürreşad Üzerine” (Concerning Eşref Edib Fergan and Sebilürreşad), in İslamcılık, 96–128.

17 There is no comprehensive analysis of Büyük Doğu at present. For limited information, see Bütün Yönleriyle Necip Fazıl (Necip Fazıl from Every Perspective) (Ankara: Türkiye Yazarlar Birliği, 1994), and Cemil Koçak, “Türk Milliyetçiliğinin İslamʾla Buluşması: Büyük Doğü” (Büyük Doğü: The Meeting of Turkish Nationalism and Islam), Milliyetçilik (Istanbul: Iletişim, 2002), 601–13.

18 For statistics on publications according to subject, see Türkiye Bibliyografyası for 1950 and 1952. Kara, “Cumhuriyet Türkiyesiʾnde.”

19 Baydoğan regularly advertised these in his Müslüman Sesi, published in Izmir after 1948.

20 For details concerning Nursi's activities in these years, see Şahiner, Necmeddin, Bilinmeyen Taraflarıyla Bediüzzaman Said Nursi (The Unknown Sides to Bediüzzaman Said Nursi) (Istanbul: Nesil, 2001)Google Scholar.

21 Gün, Fahrettin, Sebilürreşad Dergisi Ekseninde Çok Partili Hayata Geçerken İslâmcılara Göre Din, Siyaset ve Laiklik (1948–1954) (Religion, Politics, and Secularism According to Islamists in Sebilürreşad During the Transition to Multiparty Life, 1948–1954) (Istanbul: Beyan Yayınları, 2001)Google Scholar.

22 Düzdağ, M. Ertuğrul, Volkan Gazetesi (The Newspaper Volkan) (Istanbul: Iz Yayıncılık, 1992)Google Scholar.

23 Yeşil Nur's subtitle changed from “Siyasi” to “Dini, Içtimai ve Siyasi” with its seventh issue on 6 June 1951. Its first four issues were described as gayri siyasi (nonpolitical). Yeşil Nur published reasonably regularly between May 1951 and 17 August 1951 (six issues), between 28 December 1951 and 23 June 1952 (eleven issues), and occasionally between 31 October 1952 and 3 April 1953 (five issues).

24 Vatan, 22 January 1953. Yeşil Nur (Eskişehir), 9 January and 3 April 1953.

25 Interview by the author with Kemal Bülbül, Samsun, 16 March 2002. Bülbül used Vicdan Sesi to publish his own poems and often published additional sections with his literary works.

26 Cumhuriyet, 24 December 1952.

27 These rates were very similar to those of the other Samsun newspapers.

28 This was Ahali Matbaası. Büyük Cihad began to be printed there as of its seventeenth issue on 6 July 1951.

29 In his interview Bülbül recalled that Bağışlayıcı had died at a young age in an automobile accident. He could not be more specific. On 21 December 1951 Büyük Cihad reported that Bağışlayıcı had traveled to Istanbul to participate in an Islam Democrat Party meeting. Efforts were under way to establish a branch of the Islam Democrat Party in Samsun, but it does not appear to have actually opened.

30 Bülbül went by the surname Kavaklıoğlu, although this does not appear in the newspapers. On Bülbül's life, see Nasrattınoğlu, Irfan Ünver, Samsunlu Aşık Kemali Bülbül (The Samsun Poet Kemal Bülbül) (Ankara: Esengür Matbaası, 1976)Google Scholar. This differs in some details from an autobiographical vignette, “K. Bülbül Kavaklıoğlu Kimdir?” Vicdan Sesi (Samsun), 31 January 1953. I have taken the latter to be the most accurate source.

31 Bülbül was not the managing editor for the brief period between issues fifty-nine and sixty-eight.

32 Torun first appeared on 1 January 1951.

33 Cumhuriyet, 6 January 1953.

34 Information on Atılhan's life is found in Bali, Rıfat, Musaʿnın Evlatları Cumhuriyetʿin Yurttaşları (The Children of Moses, Citizens of the Republic) (Istanbul: Iletişim, 2001), 211–56Google Scholar. Büyük Cihad also provided a biography of Atılhan's early life: “Cevat Rifat Atılhan Kimdir?” 7 September 1951 and 14 September 1951.

35 Islamı Saran Tehlike ve Siyonizm (Istanbul: Cemal Azmi Matbaası, 1952); Türk Oğlu Düşmanını Tanı! (Istanbul: Ak-Ün Basımevi, 1952). Also advertised in Büyük Cihad on 10 July 1951 were Filistin Cephesinde Yahudi Casusları and Farmasonlar: İslamiyeti ve Türklügü yıkmak için Nasıl Çalıştılar.

36 Büyük Cihad, 27 April, 25 May, and 28 September 1951. İslam Dünyası and Volkan were two religious-nationalist publications to draw attention to the plight of Palestinian Muslims. Sebilürreşad and Büyük Doğu were also notable for their anti-Semitism.

37 Büyük Cihad, 16 March 1951.

38 Büyük Cihad, 23 March 1951.

39 E. Tyan “Djihad,” Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd ed.

40 “Türkiye bir müslüman devletidir ve müslüman kalacaktır.”

41 Büyük Cihad, 23 March, 11 May, and 18 May 1951.

42 Büyük Cihad, 4 May 1951.

43 “İrtica Yaygarası” initially appeared on 1 March 1951 in Komünizme Karşı Mücadele (Zonguldak) but was reprinted by numerous periodicals, including Yeşil Nur on 28 December 1951. It appeared in Büyük Cihad on 16 March 1951 and in Sebilürreşad 144 (Istanbul), February 1953 under the title “İrtica Yoktur Efendiler.”

44 Information on the Büyük Doğu Cemiyeti can be found in the pages of Büyük Dogü (Istanbul), 1 July 1949.

45 The best information on the Türk Milliyetçiler Derneği can be found in the pages of its journal, Mefkure (Ankara).

46 For party programs, see Tarık Zafer Tunaya, Türkiyeʾde Siyasi Partiler (Political Parties in Turkey) (Istanbul: n.p., 1952).

47 Although it was not an official organ of the Islam Democrat Party, it is important to note that the pages of Büyük Cihad constitute the most important source as to its activities. See also Karabatak, Haluk, “İslam Demokrat Partisi” (Islam Democrat Party), Tarih ve Toplum 130 (1994): 196205Google Scholar.

48 Discussion along these lines dominated the party's seventh congress in November–December 1947. See Yedinci Kurultay Tutanağı (Ankara: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, 1949).

49 This law was passed on 16 June 1950. See press coverage for the period and assembly debate in TBMM Tutanak Dergisi 9.1.9.178–87 (16 June 1950).

50 See, for instance, Cumhuriyet, 18, 24, and 27 March 1951.

51 Cumhuriyet, 13 and 18 March and 18 May 1951; 16 September 1952; Hürriyet (Istanbul), 14 March 1951; Samsun, 17 March 1951; Demokrat Eskişehir, 17 March 1951; Sabah (Antakya), 7 October 1952.

52 Demokrat Eskişehir, 16 March 1951.

53 Akisler (Çorum), 20 September 1952; Zafer (Ankara), 19 September 1952. Zafer defended the Democrat Party on this matter.

54 Gurses (Gaziantep), 18 October 1952; also Ulus (Ankara) 13 and 17 October, 15 and 22 September 1952.

55 Büyük Cihad, 12 September 1952.

56 Büyük Cihad, 3 October 1952.

57 Büyük Cihad, 10 and 24 October 1952.

58 Cumhuriyet, 14 and 17 October 1952; Ulus (Ankara), 16 and 26 October 1952; Yeni Sabah (Istanbul), 17 October 1952; Gündüz (Giresun) 11 December 1952; Cumhuriyet, 24 October 1952.

59 See Sebilürreşad (Istanbul) 137 (October 1952) and 138 (November 1952).

60 Büyük Cihad, 24 October 1952.

61 Ustaoğlu was later banned from the Democrat Party, prosecuted, and sentenced to six months in prison. Samsun, 13 December 1954.

62 The text of Menderes's speech delivered in Kayseri is in Ayın Tarihi (November 1952), 68.

63 Samsun Postası, 20 February 1953.

64 The Great East Association had already closed itself in June 1951. The Association of Turkish Nationalists was closed on 22 January and the Nation Party in July.

65 This law had originally prohibited the use of religion to threaten the security of the state. The new law, 5435, was ratified by the assembly on 10 June 1949. For debate in the assembly, see TBMM Tutanak Dergisi 8.20.104.572–98 (8 June 1949).

66 TBMM Tutanak Dergisi 9.9.104.303–24. Law 5816 was ratified by the Grand National Assembly on 25 July 1951.

67 This was the “Vicdan ve Toplanma Hürriyetinin Korunması Hakkında Kanun,” 6187, ratified by the assembly on 24 July 24 1953. For assembly debate, see TBMM Tutanak Dergisi 9.24.115.1043–144 (23 July 1953).

68 On the trials see Cumhuriyet, 18 July 1954. Zafer (Ankara), 4 August 1953.

69 Here the work of Meeker, Michael is particularly important: A Nation of Empire: The Ottoman Legacy of Turkish Modernity (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Ahmad, The Turkish Experiment in Democracy, 162, 171.