Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:21:56.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An explanation for the early phonemicisation of a voice contrast in English fricatives1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

STEPHEN LAKER
STEPHEN LAKER*
Affiliation:
Linguistics and English Language, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Englandstephen.laker@manchester.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most handbooks and grammars contend that in Old English the voiced fricatives [v, ð, z] were merely allophones of /f, θ, s/ in sonorous environments. How these voiced fricatives became phonemes is debated among scholars. In this article, all previous accounts are critically reviewed. A new proposal is then presented, which explains the facts in a more direct way than previous theses. I argue that phonemicisation of a previous allophonic voice alternation in fricatives had already taken place in many areas of Anglo-Saxon England through language contact with Brittonic. Voiceless as well as voiced fricative phonemes existed in Brittonic at the time of contact, and language shift would have led directly to the phonemicisation of the previous allophonic variation found in early Old English.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 13 , Issue 2: Re-evaluating the Celtic hypothesis , July 2009 , pp. 213 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, Martin J. & Williams, Briony. 2001. Welsh phonetics. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Bammesberger, Alfred. 1988. Voice opposition in the system of Old English spirants. In Kastovsky, Dieter & Bauer, Gero (eds.), Luick revisited, 119–26. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Baugh, A. C. & Cable, Thomas. 2002. A history of the English language, 5th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Jessen, Michael & Ringen, Catherine. 2006. Phonetic variation and phonological theory: German fricative voicing. In Baumer, Donald, Montero, David & Scanlon, Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th conference on formal linguistics, 76–86. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. www.lingref.com, doc. #1435 (4 August 2008).Google Scholar
Bliss, Alan. 1984. English in the south of Ireland. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 135–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Beverley & Mees, Inger. 1981. The sounds of English and Dutch. The Hague: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 2001. Gimson's pronunciation of English, 6th edn.London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2003. The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, Klaus. 1989. Die historische Schichtung phonologischer Isoglossen in den englischen Dialekten: II. Mittelenglische Isoglossen. In Fischer, Andreas (ed.), The history and the dialects of English: Festschrift for Eduard Kolb (Anglistische Forschungen 203), 133–75. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Dietz, Klaus. 1990. Die Südaltenglische Sonorisierung anlautender Spiranten. Anglia 108, 292–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Klaus. 1997. Die stimmhaften Spiranten des Mittelenglischen und ihre phonologische Entwicklung. Anglia 115, 165–92, 469–86.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Paulasto, Heli (eds.). 2008. English and Celtic in contact. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. 1984. The voicing of initial fricatives in Middle English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 27, 3–16.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 1997. Ambisyllabicity in Old English: a contrary view. In Rauch, Irmengard & Carr, Gerald F. (eds.), Insights in Germanic linguistics, vol. II: Classic and contemporary (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 94), 29–45. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 2001. Conditions for the voicing of Old English fricatives, I: Phonology. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 6 (1), 55–77.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 2002. Conditions for the voicing of Old English fricatives, II: Morphology and syllable structure. English Language and Linguistics 6 (1), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gąsiorowski, Piotr. 2005. Zounds! – The rise of voiced fricative phonemes in Middle English. Paper presented at the 4th Medieval English Studies Symposium, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, 27–28 November 2005.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 1992. English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goblirsch, Kurt G. 2003. The voicing of fricatives in West Germanic and the partial consonant shift. Folia Linguistica Historica 24 (1–2), 111–52.Google Scholar
Goblirsch, Kurt G. 2005. Lautverschiebungen in den germanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 1995. Early contact and parallels between English and Celtic. Vienna English Working Papers 4 (2), 87–119.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A grammar of Old English, vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth H. 1953. Language and history in early Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1928. Monosyllabism in English. Proceedings of the British Academy 14, 341–68. London: Humphrey Milford. [Reprinted in Jespersen 1933b: 384–408.]Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1933a. Voiced and voiceless fricatives in English. In Jespersen 1933b: 346–83.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1933b. Linguistica. Selected papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1937. Voicing of spirants in English. English Studies 19, 69–71.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1997. Phonology. In Jones, Charles (ed.), The Edinburgh history of the Scots language, 267–334. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Richard. 1974. Handbook of Middle English grammar, vol. 1: Phonology, revised and translated by Crook, E. J.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van. 1994. Old and Middle English. In König, Ekkehard & van der Auwera, Johan (eds.), The Germanic languages, 110–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 1995. Survey of Middle English dialects 1290–1350: The East Midland counties. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1956. The loss of long consonants and the rise of voiced fricatives in Middle English. Language 32 (3), 435–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2008. Changing views about Anglo-Saxons and Britons. In Aertsen, Henk & Veldhoen, Bart (eds.), Six papers from the 28th symposium on Medieval Studies held at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam on 15 December 2006, 1–38. Leiden: Leiden University Department of English.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. II: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 2006. Phonology and morphology. In Hogg, Richard & Denison, David (eds.), A history of the English language, 43–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly. 2008. An analytic dictionary of English etymology: An introduction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1914–40. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache, 2 vols. Stuttgart: Bernhard Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L. & Benskin, Michael (eds.). 1986. A linguistic atlas of late mediaeval English, vol. 1: General introduction, index of sources, dot maps. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Hans F. 1994. On the origin and spread of initial voiced fricatives and the phonemic split of fricatives in English and Dutch. In Laing, Margaret & Williamson, Keith (eds.), Speaking our tongues: Medieval dialectology and related disciplines, 19–30, discussion 51–66. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, online edition, Simpson, J. A. et al. (eds.), Oxford University Press. www.oed.com (15 July 2008).Google Scholar
Price, Glanville. 2005. An introduction to French pronunciation. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Peter. 2000. English phonetics and phonology: A practical course, 3rd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, M. 1970. Historische Grammatica van het Nederlands. 8th edn, ed. van Loey, A.. Zutphen: Thieme.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 1995. Studies in British Celtic historical phonology. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2002. The rise and fall of British Latin: Evidence from English and Brittonic. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Pitkänen, Heli (eds.), The Celtic roots of English, 87–110. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M. & Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2008. Quasi-phonemic contrast and the fuzzy inventory: Examples from Scottish English. In Avery, Peter, Dresher, Elan & Rice, Keren (eds.), Contrast in phonology: Theory, perception, acquisition, 87–113. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims-Williams, Patrick. 1990. Dating the transition to Neo-Brittonic: Phonology and history, 400–600. In Bammesberger, Alfred & Wollmann, Alfred (eds.), Britain 400–600: Language and history, 217–61. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Sledd, James. 1958. Some questions of English phonology. Language 34 (2), 252–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Seiichi. 1994. Breaking, ambisyllabicity, and the sonority hierarchy in Old English. Diachronica 11 (1), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil. 1934–5. Je prokázán Verner ův zákon pro novou angličtinu? Časopis pro moderní filologii 21. 154–61. [Translated into English by Vilém Fried as ‘Can Verner's Law be applied to Modern English?’. In Trnka 1982: 210–18.]Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil. 1936. On the phonological development of spirants in English. In Jones, Daniel & Fry, D. B. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 60–4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil. 1938. The phonemic development of spirants in English. English Studies 20, 26–31. [Reprinted in Trnka 1982: 224–31.]Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil. 1982. Selected papers in structural linguistics: Contributions to English and General Linguistics written in the years 1928–1978, ed. Fried, Vilém. Berlin and New York: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Willem. 1997. The syllable in Frisian. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn F. 1988. The phonology of South-Western English: 1500–1700. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical dialectology, regional and social, 609–44. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English, vol. 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, David L. 2006. On the areal pattern of ‘Brittonicity’ in English and its implications. In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (eds.), The Celtic Englishes IV, 306–35. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press.Google Scholar
Whitley, M. Stanley. 1986. Spanish/English contrasts: A course in Spanish linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, David. Forthcoming. Old and Middle Welsh. In Ball, Martin J. & Müller, Nicole (eds.), The Celtic languages, 2nd edn.London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar