Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:35:48.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2009

Jennifer Smith ,
Mercedes Durham  and
Liane Fortune
Jennifer Smith
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Mercedes Durham
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Liane Fortune
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

T/d deletion is one of the most widely studied variables in sociolinguistic research, and findings demonstrate universal morphological and phonological constraints across a range of dialects. Research into the acquisition of this variable suggests that articulatory constraints are learned first, followed by grammatical, and finally stylistic and social constraints. Dialect-specific constraints are also found, implicating the caregiver in the process of acquisition. In this article, we contribute to this research on the acquisition of t/d through the examination of the speech of preschool children in interaction with their primary caregivers in a community in Scotland. Our results mirror previous results on how and when particular constraints are acquired, providing further evidence for universal order of acquisition of this form. We also demonstrate dialect-specific constraints on use that can be mapped directly to caregiver speech. This provides additional evidence on how variable forms are transmitted from parent to child in these early stages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 69 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bayley, Robert. (1994). Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English. Language Variation and Change 6:303–326.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2000). The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. (2003). Sociolinguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Davis, Barbara, & Lindblom, Austin. (2001). Phonetic variability in baby talk and development of vowel categories. In Claes von Hofsten, F. L. & Heimann, M. (eds.) Emerging cognitive abilities in early infancy. Hahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 135–171.Google Scholar
Dictionary of Scots Language. (2008). Available at: http://www.dsl.ac.uk/dsl/. Accessed: July 29, 2008.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerry, & Watt, Dom. (1999). Tracking the emergence of structured variation: Realisations of (t) by Newcastle children. LeedsWorking Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 7:1–25.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerry, & Watt, Dom. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81(1):177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnica, Olga. (1977). Some prosodic and paralinguistic features of speech to young children. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A., (eds.) Talking to children: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 63–88.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1977). A new look at -t, -d deletion. In Fasold, R. W. & Shuy, R. W., (eds.) Studies in language variation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 1–11.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 1–36.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1991a). Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3(1):1–22.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1991b). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3(2):223–239.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory, & Boberg, Charles. (1997). Inherent variability and the obligatory contour principle. Language Variation and Change 9:149–164.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory, & Boyd, Sally. (1990). The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change 2:1–18.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Dan, Bell, Allan, Gregory, Michelle, & Raymond, William. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 229–254.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1982). Lexical phonology and morphology. In Yang, I.-S. (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kirk, Cecilia, & Demuth, Katherine. (2005). Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Journal of Child Language 32 (4):709–734.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1975). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1:85–97.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1997). Resyllabification. In Hinskins, F., van Hout, R. & Wetzels, L. (eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 145–179.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Labov, William, & Cohen, Paul. (1967). Systematic relations of standard and non-standard rules in the grammars of Negro speakers. Project Literacy Reports No. 8. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. 66–84.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. (1991). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Malsheen, Bathsheba. (1980). Two hypotheses for phonetic clarification in the speech of mothers to children. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. & Ferguson, C. (eds.), Child phonology. Vol. 2. Perception. New York: Academic Press. 173–184.Google Scholar
McLeod, Sharynne, van Doorn, Jan, & Reed, Vicki. (2001a). Normal acquisition of consonant clusters. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 10:99–110.Google Scholar
McLeod, Sharynne, van Doorn, Jan, & Reed, Vicki. (2001b). Consonant cluster development in two-year-olds: General trends and individual difference. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research 44:1144–1171.Google Scholar
Neu, Helene. (1980). Ranking of constraints on /t,d/ deletion in American English: A statistical analysis. In Labov, W. (ed.) Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 37–54Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter. (1991). Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t, d deletion and past-tense marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3:171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Peter. (1999). Urban Jamaican Creole: Variation in the mesolect. Varieties of English Around the World G17. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. (1992). The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English. In Meisel, J. M., (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 23–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, William. (1994). Variation and phonological theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie. (1995). The acquisition of variable rules: t,d deletion and -ing production in preschool children. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie. (1997). Acquisition of variable rules: a study of (-t,d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24:351–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, Julie. (2002). Child language variation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 333–348.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie, & Labov, William. (1995). Learning to talk Philadelphian. Language Variation and Change 7:101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali, & Smith, Eric. (2005). Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. (1992). Chicano English evidence for the exponential hypothesis: A variable rule pervades lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 4:275–288.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. (1996). Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English. Language Variation and Change 8:63–89.Google Scholar
Shriberg, Lawrence, & Kwiatkowski, Joan. (1980). Natural process analysis. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. (2000a). Synchrony and diachrony in the evolution of English: Evidence from Scotland. D.Phil. dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. (2000b). You Ø na hear o' that kind o' things: Negative do in Buckie Scots. English World-Wide 21(2):231–259.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. (2001). Negative concord in the Old and New World: Evidence from Scotland. Language Variation and Change 13(2):109–134.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, & Fortune, Liane. (2007). “Mam, ma troosers is fa' in doon!”: Community, caregiver and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1):63–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, Fortune, Liane, & Steele, Hazel. (forthcoming). The acquisition of markers, indicators and stereotypes in pre-school children.Google Scholar
Snow, Catherine. (1995). Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell. 180–193.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, Carol. (1987). Phonological skills of 2-year-olds. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 18:323–329.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane. (2003). The phonology of modern urban Scots. In Corbett, J., McClure, J. D. & Stuart-Smith, J. (eds.), The Edinburgh companion to Scots. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 110–137.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, & Temple, Rosalind. (2005). New perspectives on an ol' variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17:281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torbert, Benjamin. (2001). Tracing Native American language history through consonant cluster reduction: The case of Lumbee English. American Speech 76: 361–387.Google Scholar
Walker, James. (2008). On the role of frequency and the lexicon in phonological variation: (t/d)-deletion in Toronto English. Presented at Canadian Linguistic Association, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Waring, Robert, Fisher, John, & Atkin, Neil. (2001). The articulation survey: Putting numbers to it. In Wilson, L. & Hewat, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Speech Pathology Australia national conference: Evidence and innovation. Melbourne: Speech Pathology Australia. 145–151.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistics description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Christian, Donna. (1976). Appalachian speech. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar