Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:58:03.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FRENCH ABSOLUTISM, MARSEILLAIS CIVIC HUMANISM, AND THE LANGUAGES OF PUBLIC GOOD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2006

JUNKO THÉRÈSE TAKEDA
Affiliation:
Syracuse University

Abstract

This article contributes to current historical knowledge on the relationship between Crown and local municipal power in Old Regime France. In particular, it examines the political language of bien public mobilized by Marseillais elites and royal administrators between 1660 and 1700 in the context of French commercial expansion. Traditionally, ‘public good’ could be understood in two distinct ways. Derived from royal absolutist doctrine, public good was what the king willed to preserve the state, a collection of diverse, corporate bodies held together by royal justice and reason. Derived from civic humanistic, municipal traditions, public good was the united will of the civic community. Investigating three moments where these two definitions of public good converged and collided – during Marseille's urban expansion (1666), in the local justification of modern commerce, and in the deliberations at the Council of Commerce (1700) – this article points to several mutations in the language of public good at the end of the seventeenth century. Pointing to the convergence of civic humanistic and absolutist traditions, this article demonstrates that centralization under Louis XIV, rather than obscuring local traditions, allowed for the intensification of civic humanistic, republican sensibilities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based on a chapter of my dissertation. ‘Between conquest and plague: Marseillais civic humanism in the Age of Absolutism, 1660–1725’ (Stanford University, 2006). I am grateful to Keith Michael Baker, Carolyn Lougee Chappell, Jessica Riskin, and Paul Robinson at Stanford University for their comments and supervision on drafts of this article. I would also like to thank Jacques Guilhaumou and Yair Mintzker, as well as the anonymous referees for this journal.