Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T01:59:10.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment tool (KICA): development of a cognitive assessment tool for older indigenous Australians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2006

D. LoGiudice
Affiliation:
National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Australia
K. Smith
Affiliation:
Kimberley Aged and Community Services, Derby, WA, Australia School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Australia
J. Thomas
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Australia
N. T. Lautenschlager
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Australia
O. P. Almeida
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Australia
D. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services Council, Western Australia and Rural Clinical School, University of Western Australia, Australia
L. Flicker
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Australia

Abstract

Background: Indigenous Australians have a unique cultural heritage dating back many thousands of years. Unfortunately, there is no validated tool to assess cognition in older indigenous Australians. This study was designed to address this deficiency. The Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (KICA) was developed with Indigenous health and aged care organizations, and comprises cognitive, informant and functional sections. The psychometric properties of the cognitive assessment section (KICA-Cog) are described in this paper.

Methods: The KICA-Cog was tested in 70 indigenous subjects, of varying cognitive abilities and diagnoses, over 45 years of age. Subjects were interviewed using the KICA-Cog and then independently assessed by expert clinical raters using DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria. Interrater and internal reliability were determined.

Results: The KICA-Cog score showed no systematic interrater difference; the mean was −0.07 (SD = 1.83). Interrater reliability for 16 individual questions from the cognitive section revealed a κ-value ≥ 0.6 and intraclass correlations for 12 questions. Internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's α, was 0.88. Three items on the cognitive score (pension week, recall and free recall) effectively discriminated 85–7% of dementia cases. Sensitivity and specificity were 90.6% and 92.6%, respectively, using a cut-off score of 31/32.

Conclusions: The KICA-Cog appears to be a reliable assessment tool for cognitive impairment in an Australian older traditionally living indigenous population.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
International Psychogeriatric Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)