Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:46:25.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

At the Crossroads: Congress and American Political Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2006

Ira Katznelson  and
John S. Lapinski
Ira Katznelson
Affiliation:
Columbia University (iik1@columbia.edu)>
John S. Lapinski
Affiliation:
Yale University (john.lapinski@yale.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This essay starts with an observation, proceeds to an exhortation, and concludes with a set of suggestions.

Congress has been situated on the outside edge of the subfield of American Political Development (APD) despite the institution's centrality both to the political history of the United States and to political science as a discipline. Apart from an important but limited number of works—including a long-term research enterprise on the role of sectionalism conducted by Richard Bensel, a study of the antebellum Senate by Elaine Swift, an assessment of the alliance between farmers and workers in the half-century after 1877 by Elizabeth Sanders, a major work on institutional transformations in the House and Senate by Eric Schickler, and a small number of emergent inquiries—“scholars in the American Political Development tradition,” as Keith Whittington has noted, “have never fully integrated Congress, as they have other important institutions such as the bureaucracy, the presidency, political parties and the courts.”Ira Katznelson is Ruggles Professor of Political Science and History at Columbia University (iik1@columbia.edu). John S. Lapinski is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale University (john.lapinski@yale.edu). This article reflects the work of the American Institutions Project located at the Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy at Columbia University and the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University, the support of the National Science Foundation (SES 0318280 and SES 03188289), and the conducive environment for research and writing provided by the Russell Sage Foundation. We particularly wish to thank Rose Razaghian for her reading and suggestions, Eldon Porter for his assistance, and the three anonymous readers for this journal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 243 - 260
Copyright
© 2006 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, E. Scott. 2002. Why Congressional Reforms Fail: Reelection and the House Committee System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Adler, E. Scott, and John S. Lapinski. 1997. Demand-side theory and Congressional committee composition: A constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 895–918.Google Scholar
Adler, E. Scott, and John S. Lapinski, eds. 2006. The Macropolitics of Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, Frank, and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank, and Bryan D. Jones. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Bryan D. Jones, and Michael C. MacLeod. 1998. Lessons from the trenches: Quality, reliability, and usability in a new data source. The Political Methodologist 8(2): 2–10.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. 1984. Sectionalism and American Political Development, 1880–1980. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bensel, Richard. 1990. Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bensel, Richard. 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bensel, Richard. 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bessette, Joseph M. 1994. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Binder, Sarah. 1996. The partisan basis of procedural choice: Allocating parliamentary rights in the House, 1789–1990. American Political Science Review 90(1): 8–20.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blockmans, Wim. 1998. A History of Power in Europe: Peoples, Markets, States. Brussels, New York, Frankfurt: Antwerp.
Braddick, Michael J. 2000. State Formation in Early Modern England, c. 1550–1700. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brady, David. 1978. Critical elections, Congressional parties and clusters of policy change. British Journal of Political Science 8(1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Brady, David. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Brady, David, and Barbara Sinclair. 1984. Building majorities for policy changes in the House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 46(4): 1033–60.Google Scholar
Brady, David, and Joseph Stewart. 1982. Congressional party realignment and transformations of public policy in three realignment eras. American Journal of Political Science 26(2): 333–60.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. 1989. The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Bridges, Amy. 1997. Morning Glories: Municipal Reform in the Southwest. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burnham, W. Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.
Cameron, Charles. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carpenter, Daniel P., and Keith Whittington. 2003. Executive power in American institutional development. Perspectives on Politics 1(3): 495–513.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chamberlain, Lawrence H. 1946. The President, Congress and Legislation. New York: Columbia University.
Clausen, Aage R. 1967. Measurement identity in the longitudinal analysis of legislative voting. American Political Science Review 41(4): 1020–35.Google Scholar
Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Clausen, Aage R., and Richard B. Cheney. 1970. A comparative analysis of Senate and House voting on economic and welfare policy, 1953–1964. American Political Science Review 44(1): 138–52.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, and John S. Lapinski. 2005a. Measuring significant legislation, 1877–1945. In Process, Party and Policymaking: Further New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. David Brady and Mathew McCubbins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Clinton, Joshua, and John S. Lapinski. 2005b. Measuring legislative accomplishment, 1877–1994. American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 232–49.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M, William H. Flanigan, and Nancy Zingale. 1980. Partisan Realignment: Voters, Parties and Government in American History. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Coleman, John. 1996. Party Decline in America: Policy, Politics and the Fiscal State. Princeton: Princeton University.
Collier, Ruth Berns, and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cooper, Joseph, and David W. Brady. 1981a. Institutional context and leadership style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn. American Political Science Review 75(2): 411–25.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and David W. Brady. 1981b. Toward a diachronic analysis of Congress. American Political Science Review 75: 988–1006.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Mathew McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cox, Gary, and Mathew McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
d'Entreves, Alexander Passerin. 1967. The Notion of the State: An Introduction to Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downing, Brian. 1992. The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Eisenach, Eldon J. 1994. Lost Promise of Progressivism. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. Mackuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Farrier, Jasmine. 2004. Passing the Buck: Congress, the Budget and Deficits. Lexington: University of Kentucky.
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Harper Collins.
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 2003. Going Home: Black Representatives and Their Constituents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Finegold, Kenneth, and Theda Skocpol. 1995. State and Party in America's New Deal. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Finer, S.E. 1997. The History of Government. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gaddis, John Lewis. 2002. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. New York: Oxford University Press.
Galloway, George B. 1946. Congress at the Crossroads. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.
Gamm, Gerald, and John Huber. 2002. Legislatures as political institutions: Beyond the contemporary Congress. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, eds. Ira Katznelson and Helen Milner. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Gerring, John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gottschalk, Marie. 2000. The Shadow Welfare State: Labor, Business and the Politics of Health Care in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Greenstone, J. David. 1993. The Lincoln Persuasion: Remaking American Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hacker, Jacob. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America: an Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Hattam, Victoria. 1993. Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hattam, Victoria. 2004. Order and Change in American Politics. Presented at the American Political Development Conference, Yale University, October 23–24.
Heckman, James J., and James M. Snyder Jr. 1997. Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. RAND Journal of Economics 28(0): S142–89.Google Scholar
Hoppitt, Julian. 2000. A Land of Liberty? England, 1680–1727. Oxford: Clarendon.
Huber, John D., and Charles R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Immergut, Ellen. 1998. The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics and Society 26(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Meg, William Novak, and Julian Zelizer. 2003. The Democratic Experiment: New Directions in American Political History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, Jeffrey. 1999. Examining the bonding effects of party: A comparative analysis of roll call voting in the U.S. and Confederate Houses. American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1144–65.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1981. City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States. New York: Pantheon Books.
Katznelson, Ira. 1997. Structure and configuration in comparative politics. In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, eds. Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katznelson, Ira. 2002. Flexible capacity: The military and early American statebuilding. In Shaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development, eds. Ira Katznelson and Martin Shefter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Katznelson, Ira. 2003. Periodization and Preferences: Reflections on Purposive Action in Comparative Historical Social Science. In Comparative Political Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas, eds. James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katznelson, Ira. 2005. “To give counsel and consent: Why the King (Edward I) expelled his Jews (in 1290). In Preferences and Situations: Points Of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, eds. Ira Katznelson and Barry R. Weingast. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Katznelson, Ira, Kim Geiger, and Daniel Kryder. 1993. Limiting liberalism: The Southern veto in Congress, 1933–1950. Political Science Quarterly 108(2): 283–306.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and John S. Lapinski. 2006. The substance of representation: Studying policy content and legislative behavior. In The Macropolitics of Congress, eds. Scott E. Adler and John S. Lapinski. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Katznelson, Ira, and Martin Shefter. 2002. Shaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Katznelson, Ira, and Barry Weingast, eds. 2005. Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Key, V.O. Jr. 1955. A Theory of Critical Elections. Journal of Politics 17(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
King, Desmond S. 1995. Separate and Unequal: Blacks Americans and the US Federal Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
King, Desmond S., and Rogers M. Smith. 2005. Racial Orders in American political development. American Political Science Review 99(1): 75–92.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: a Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kryder, Daniel. 2000. Divided Arsenal: Race and the American State during World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kryder, Daniel. 2004. Entrepreneurs Controlling Agency: Police Response to Disorder in Washington D.C. Presented at the American Political Development Conference, Yale University, October 23–24.
Lapinski, John S. 2005. “The Substance of Policy-Making: An Empirical Assessment, 1877–1994.” Presented at the Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lieberman, Robert C. 2002. Ideas, institutions, and political order: Explaining political change. American Political Science Review 96(4): 697–712.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 1998. Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics 16(4): 677–715.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1970. Decision Making vs. Policy Making: Toward an Antidote for Technocracy. Public Administration Review 30(3): 314–25.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review 32(4): 298–310.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1966. Party Loyalty among Congressmen: The Difference between Democrats and Republicans, 1947–1962. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 2000. America's Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison through Newt Gingrich. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mezey, Michael L. 1993. Legislatures: Individual purpose and institutional performance. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Ada Finifter. Washington D.C.: American Political Science Association.
Moore, Barrington. 1966. The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon.
Morgan, Edmund S. 1988. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and the United States. New York: W.W. Norton.
Nettl, J. P. 1968. The State as a Conceptual Variable. World Politics 20: 559–92.Google Scholar
North, Douglass, and Barry Weingast. 1989. Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth century England. Journal of Economic History 49(4): 803–32.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 1994. Beyond the iconography of order: Notes for a “new” institutionalism. In Dynamics of American Politics, eds. L.C. Dodd and C. Jillson. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 2002. The study of American political development. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, eds. Ira Katznelson and Helen Milner. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 2004. Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45(4): 595–628.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pierson, Paul, and Theda Skocpol. 2002. Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, eds. Ira Katznelson and Helen Milner. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Plotke, David. 1996. Building A Democratic Political Order: Reshaping American Liberalism in the 1930s and 1940s. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. The institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 62(1): 144–68.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W., and Eric Schickler. 2002. Landmarks in the study of Congress since 1945. Annual Review of Political Science 5: 333–67.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: a Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ritter, Gretchen. 1997. Goldbugs and Greenbacks: The Antimonopoly Tradition and the Politics of Finance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Post-Reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1999. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers and the American State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shefter, Martin. 1977. Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy. Politics and Society 7(4): 403–51.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth, and Barry Weingast. 1987. The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1978. From party voting to regional fragmentation: The House of Representatives. American Politics Quarterly 6(2): 125–46.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: the Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1996. Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn against Government in U.S. Politics. New York: Www. Norton & Company.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics President Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 1993. Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The multiple traditions in America. American Political Science Review 87(3): 549–66.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in US History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stewart, Charles. 1989. Budget Reform Politics: the Design of the Appropriations Process in the House of Representatives, 1865–1921. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swift, Elaine K. 1996. The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787–1841. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.Google Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel. 2002. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1975. Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Valelly, Richard M. 2004. The Two Reconstructions: The Struggle for Black Enfranchisement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weir, Margaret. 1992. Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Whittington, Keith E. 1999. What's the point of APD? Clio 9(2): 5, 43–45.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1973. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
Zolberg, Aristide. 2006. A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning in the United States, 1750–2000. Cambridge and New York: Harvard University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
Zolberg, Aristide, and Peter Benda. 2001. Global Migrants, Global Refugees: Problems and Solutions. New York: Berghahn Books.