Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:38:41.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does the shallow structures proposal account for qualitative differences in first and second language processing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2006

Laura Sabourin
Affiliation:
University of Oregon

Extract

In their Keynote Article, Clahsen and Felser (CF) provide a detailed summary and comparison of grammatical processing in adult first language (L1) speakers, child L1 speakers, and second language (L2) speakers. CF conclude that child and adult L1 processing makes use of a continuous parsing mechanism, and that any differences found in processing can be explained by factors such as limited working memory capacity and incomplete lexical knowledge. The authors then suggest that the existing differences between L1 (both adult and child) and L2 processing provide evidence that parsing mechanisms are qualitatively different between these groups. They posit that this qualitative difference between L1 and L2 is due to L2 speakers having shallower and less detailed syntactic representations than L1 speakers. This commentary focuses on discussing this shallow structures account and considers what this means for L2 processing.

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Paradis M. 1994. Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp. 393419). London: Academic Press.
Paradis M. 1997. The cognitive neuropsychology of bilingualism. In A. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 331354). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paradis M. 2004. A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Perani D., Abutalebi J., Paulesu E., Brambati S., Scifo P. Cappa S. F., et al. 2003. The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping, 19, 170182.Google Scholar
Sabourin L. 2003. Grammatical gender and second language processing: An ERP study. University of Groningen (Groningen Dissertation in Linguistics 42).
Sabourin L., & Stowe L. A. 2005. Second language processing: Circumstances under which the P600 effect is present. Manuscript in preparation.
Sabourin L., Stowe L. A., & de Haan G. J. (in press). Transfer effects in learning an L2 grammatical gender system. Second Language Research.
Ullman M. 2001. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105122.Google Scholar