Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:07:58.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do children become adult sentence producers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2006

Cecile McKee ,
Matt Rispoli ,
Dana McDaniel  and
Merrill Garrett
Cecile McKee
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Matt Rispoli
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Dana McDaniel
Affiliation:
University of Southern Maine
Merrill Garrett
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We join other responders in thanking Clahsen and Felser (CF) for pulling together these observations about the development of language processing. We are especially impressed by the generality and inclusiveness of CF's treatment of development in L1 and L2. Because most of their specifics concerned comprehension processes, our contribution will emphasize the added value of an appeal to production processes. In particular, we will articulate the value of applying existing production models to developmental phenomena. Language development can be interpreted in revealing ways through the lens of adult sentence production models. These models specify how lexical, syntactic, morphological, and phonological knowledge are integrated in real time as we produce sentences. They are performance models, but they go well beyond general measures of working memory and general notions of limited capacity and resources.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 74 - 81
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom P. 1990. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 491– 504.Google Scholar
Bock K. 1987. Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 3, pp. 337– 390). London: LEA.
Bock K. 1991. A sketchbook of production problems. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 141– 160.Google Scholar
Bock K., Eberhard K. M., & Cutting J. C. 2004. Producing pronoun number. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 251– 278.Google Scholar
Bock K., & Levelt W. 1994. Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945– 984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bock K., Loebell H., & Morey R. 1992. From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150– 171.Google Scholar
Bock K., & Miller C. 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45– 93.Google Scholar
Caramazza A. 1997. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177– 208.Google Scholar
Clahsen H., Hadler M., & Weyerts H. 2004. Speeded production of inflected words in children and adults. Journal of Child Language, 31, 683– 712.Google Scholar
Crain S., & Thornton R. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dapretto M., & Bjork E. 2000. The development of word retrieval abilities in the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth. Child Development, 71, 635– 648.Google Scholar
Dell G. 1986. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283– 321.Google Scholar
Dell G., Schwartz M., Martin N., Saffran E. M., & Gagnon D. A. 1997. Lexical access in aphasic and non-aphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801– 838.Google Scholar
Ferreira V. 2003. The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 379– 398.Google Scholar
Foygel D., & Dell G. 2000. Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 182– 216.Google Scholar
Fromkin V. 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27– 52.Google Scholar
Garrett M. F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 133– 177). New York: Academic Press.
Garrett M. F. 1982. Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 19– 76). London: Academic Press.
Garrett M. F. 1984. The organization of processing structure for language production: Applications to aphasic speech. In D. Caplan, A. R. Lecours, & A. Smith (Eds.), Biological perspectives on language (pp. 172– 193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jaeger J. J. 1992. Not by the hair of my hinny hin hin: Some general properties of slips of the tongue in young children. Journal of Child Language, 19, 335– 366.Google Scholar
Kempen G. 2004. Human grammatical coding: Shared structure formation resources for grammatical encoding and decoding. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing.
LaPointe S. 1985. A theory of verb form use in the speech of agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 24, 100– 155.Google Scholar
Levelt W. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt W., Roelofs A., & Meyer A. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1– 75.Google Scholar
Marshall J. C. 1979. Language acquisition in a biological frame of reference. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 437– 453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDaniel D., & Lech D. 2003. The production system's formulation of relative clause structures: Evidence from Polish. Language Acquisition, 11, 63– 97.Google Scholar
McDaniel D., McKee C., & Garrett M. F. 2005. Children's planning of complex sentences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
McKee C., & Emiliani M. 1992. Il clitico: C'é ma non si vede [The clitic: It's there but it's not seen]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 415– 437.Google Scholar
McKee C., & Iwasaki N. 2001. Lemma structure in language learning: Comments on representation and realization. In J. Weissenborn & B. Hoehle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic, and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 125– 144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McKee C., & McDaniel D. 1998. Bound to speak: Universal grammar in first language acquisition. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences.
Pinker S. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
Postma A. 2000. Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97– 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford A. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rice M., Wexler K., Marquis J., & Herschberger S. 2000. Acquisition of irregular past tense by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 1126– 1145.Google Scholar
Rispoli M. 2003. Components of sentence production during the development of grammar. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.
Rispoli M., & Hadley P. 2001. The leading-edge: The significance of sentence disruptions in the development of grammar. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 1131– 1143.Google Scholar
Stemberger J. P. 1989. Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 164– 188.Google Scholar
Valian V., Hoeffner J., & Aubrey S. 1996. Young children's imitation of sentence subjects: Evidence of processing limitations. Developmental Psychology, 32, 153– 164.Google Scholar
Vigliocco G., & Hartsuiker R. 2002. The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442– 472.Google Scholar
Vousden J. I., Brown G. D. A., & Harley T. 2000. Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101– 175.Google Scholar
Wexler K. 1996. The development of inflection in a biologically based theory of language acquisition. In M. Rice (Ed.), Toward a genetics of language (pp. 113– 144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wijnen F. 1990. The development of sentence planning. Journal of Child Language, 17, 651– 676.Google Scholar
Wijnen F. 1992. Incidental word and sound errors in young speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 734– 755.Google Scholar