Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T18:52:48.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analogical Modeling and morphological change: the case of the adjectival negative prefix in English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2005

DON CHAPMAN
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, 4047 JFSB, Provo, UT 84606, USA. don_chapman@byu.edu, royal skousen@byu.edu
ROYAL SKOUSEN
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, 4047 JFSB, Provo, UT 84606, USA. don_chapman@byu.edu, royal skousen@byu.edu

Abstract

This article examines the usefulness of Skousen's Analogical Modeling (AM) for explaining morphological change. In contrast to previous accounts of analogy, AM constitutes a general unified model of language that accounts for both sporadic and systematic changes. AM also provides explicit constraints on analogy that allow explanation of how morphological changes begin, which forms most likely serve as patterns for analogy, and which forms are most likely to change.

AM is then tested on the case of the adjectival negative prefix in English (in-, un-, dis-, etc.), using the Middle and Early Modern English portions of the Helsinki corpus as a basis for prediction. AM was given the task of using forms containing negative prefixes for one time period to predict the prefixes that adjectives would take in the subsequent time period. For each of the roughly seventy-year periods in the corpus, AM was able to predict valid prefixes about 90 percent of the time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)