Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T06:22:13.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Edwardian Labour Unrest and Coalfield Militancy, 1890–1914*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Roy Church
Roy Church
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many years a consensus among historians of the Edwardian age drew a contrast between the essentially stable, liberal society of the late Victorian years, when discussion, compromise and orderly behaviour were the norm, and an Edwardian society in which tacit conventions governing the conduct of those involved in social and political movements began to be rejected – by Pankhurst feminists, Ulster Unionists, trade union militants and syndicalists. This period of crisis was so described in 1935 by Edward Dangerfield in the The strange death of liberal England, a brilliantly evocative title which, despite the lack of precision contained in the argument presented in his book, exercised an enduring influence on subsequent interpretations of British social and political history before 1914. G. D. H. Cole and Raymond Postgate reinforced this interpretation of a society in crisis, and not until Dr Henry Pelling's Politics and society in late Victorian Britain appeared in 1968 was the notion firmly rejected. There he denied that the convergence of the Irish conflict over home rule, the violence of the militant suffragettes, and unprecedented labour unrest signified either connexions or a common fundamental cause. The re-printing of Dangerfield's book in 1980 (and Pelling's in 1979) has been followed by renewed interest in these competitive hypotheses, and has led historians to re-examine the Edwardian age.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 841 - 857
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For convenient summaries, see Pelling, Henry, Popular politics and society in late Victorian Britain, 2nd edn (London, 1979), pp. 147–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and White, Joe, ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, in Cronin, James E. and Schneer, Jonathan (eds.), Social conflict and the political order in modern Britain (London, 1982), pp. 73–5Google Scholar.

2 Read, Donald (ed.), Edwardian England (London, 1982)Google Scholar.

3 O'Day, Alan (ed.), The Edwardian age: conflict and stability (London, 1979), pp. 3–5Google Scholar.

4 Meacham, Standish, A life apart: The English working class, 1890–1914 (London, 1977), p. 219Google Scholar; see also ‘The sense of an impending clash: English working-class unrest before the First World War’, American Historical Review, LXXVII (1972), 1343–6Google Scholar.

5 Cronin, and Schneer, , Social conflict, ‘Introduction’, and especially White, ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, pp. 75, 93Google Scholar.

6 Clegg, H. A, The history of British trade unions, vol. II (London, 1985), 24Google Scholar.

7 Pelling, , Popular politics, p. 150Google Scholar.

8 Morgan, Kenneth O. (ed.), Edwardian England (London, 1986), p. 97Google Scholar.

9 Stearns, P. N., Lives of labour: work in a maturing industrial society (London, 1975), p. 335Google Scholar; Price, Richard, Masters, unions and men: work control in building and the rise of Labour, 1830–1914 (Cambridge, 1980), chs. 5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; White, , ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, pp. 77–8Google Scholar.

10 Holton, Bob, British syndicalism 1900–1914: myths and realities (London, 1976), p. 20Google Scholar.

11 Price, Masters, unions and men, chs. 5–7.

12 White, , ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, pp. 79–85Google Scholar.

13 Ibid. p. 84; Brown, Phelps, The growth of British industrial relations: a study from the standpoint of 1906–14 (London, 1959), pp. 337–8Google Scholar.

14 White, , ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, p. 79Google Scholar.

15 Meacham, , A life apart, p. 219Google Scholar, White, , ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, p. 79Google Scholar. Gourvish, T. R. ‘Living standards’, O'Day, (ed.), The Edwardian age, quoted in O'Day's introduction, pp. 3–4Google Scholar.

16 Knowles, K. C. J. C., Strikes – a study in industrial conflict with special reference to British experience between 1911 and 1947 (Oxford, 1952), p. 145Google Scholar.

17 For analysis of the problems of definition and weaknesses of the official statistics on strikes see Knowles, , Strikes, pp. 299–305Google Scholar and Silver, Michael, ‘Recent British strike trends: a factual analysis’, Journal of British Industrial Relations, XI (1973), pp. 66–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also Outram, Quentin, ‘The strike data’, unpublished research paper, School of Economic Studies, University of Leeds, 1981Google Scholar.

18 Davidson, Roger, The labour problem in late Victorian and Edwardian Britain (London, 1985), pp. 85–98Google Scholar, provides a detailed account of the work of the labour department of the board of trade and its predecessor the labour bureau.

19 Ibid. pp. 97–8.

20 Davidson, , The Labour problem, p. 113Google Scholar.

21 Ibid.

22 Davidson, Roger, ‘Llewellyn Smith, the labour department and the government growth’ Sutherland, G. (ed.), Studies in the growth of nineteenth century government (London, 1972), pp. 227–62Google Scholar.

23 Changes in the criteria are documented in the annual report on strikes and lock-outs as a preamble to the statistical tables.

24 See departmental labour correspondent Burnett's, John comment on the relative insignificance of “disputes of pureh local interest of a brief duration, and affecting but small numbers of persons, about which full details may not always be available, but these are so few and so unimportant that they may be treated as a negligible quantity’, Report on strikes and lockouts (1895), p. 9Google Scholar

25 Board, of trade Annual Report, 1897, p. XIGoogle Scholar; 1902, p. 9.

26 Cronin, , Industrial conflict, pp. 106–7Google Scholar.

27 Ibid, 106–7, 176.

28 Morgan, Kenneth O, ‘A time for miners to forget history’, New Society, 21 02 1985, p. 283Google Scholar.

29 Cronin, , Industrial conflict, p. 28Google Scholar.

30 Ibid.

31 Brown, Phelps, Growth of British industrial relations (London, 1959), p. 334Google Scholar.

32 Pollard, Sidney, The development of the British economy, 1914–80 (London, 1983) p. 13Google Scholar.

33 Gourvish, T. R., ‘The standard of living’, O'Day, Alan (ed.), Edwardian England (1979), pp. 26–7, 28–9Google Scholar.

34 Church, R. A., The history of the British coal industry, vol. 3, Victorian pre-eminence, 1830–1913 (Oxford, 1986), pp. 499–503Google Scholar.

35 Ibid, pp. 522–41.

36 Ibid, pp. 578–80.

37 See below.

38 White, , ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, p. 76Google Scholar.

39 Gourvish, , ‘The standard of living’, O'Day, Alan (ed.), Edwardian England (London, 1979), pp. 28–9Google Scholar.

40 Church, , History, pp. 254–5Google Scholar.

41 Ibid. pp. 337–8.

42 Ibid. pp. 558–60.

43 Ibid. pp. 420–2.

44 Ibid. pp. 589–90.

45 Ibid. p. 584.

46 Ibid.

47 Ibid. p. 725.

48 Ibid. p. 693.

49 Ibid. pp. 713–14, 729–30.

50 Ibid. p. 728.

51 White, , ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, pp. 80–4Google Scholar.

52 Holton, Bob, British syndicalism, 1900–1914 (London, 1976), p. 202Google Scholar; Smith, D., ‘Leaders and led’, Hopkins, K. S. (ed.), Rhondda past and future (1979), pp. 37–65Google Scholar; Davies, P., ‘Syndicalism and the Yorkshire mines, 1910–14’ (Unpublished dissertation, University of Bradford, 1977), pp. 150, 156Google Scholar.

53 Holton, , British syndicalism, 1900–1914, pp. 85–8Google Scholar; White, , ‘1910–1914 reconsidered’, p. 90Google Scholar.

54 See especially Jones, G. Stedman, ‘Working class culture and working class politics in London, 1870–1900: note on the re-making of a working class’, Journal of Social History, VII (1974), 460–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meacham, A life apart, ch. 7.

55 An extensive literature produced by sociologists pursues this theme, though the thesis is not universally accepted. For an historian's interpretation of mining communities see Storm-Clark, Christopher, ‘The miners, 1870–1970: a test for oral history’, Victorian Studies, XV (1971), 49–74Google Scholar.

56 White, J., Limits of trade union militancy, p. 180Google Scholar.

57 An alternative comparative approach to measuring strike proneness as a persistent phenomenon in certain regions excludes the very large stoppages which were either national, inter-regional, or extensive regional. The result showed south Wales and Scotland to be relatively militant regions, but also recorded a high percentage of working days lost in Yorkshire compared with the proportion of miners employed in the region.

58 Cronin, , Industrial conflict, pp. 106–7Google Scholar.

59 Ibid.

60 Gregory, Roy, The miners and politics (Oxford, 1968), pp. 189–90Google Scholar.