Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T20:26:27.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul de Lacy, Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. xviii+447.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2008

Andrew Nevins  and
Keith Plaster
Andrew Nevins*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Keith Plaster*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
*
Authors' address: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Boylston Hall, 3rd Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. nevins@fas.harvard.edukplaster@fas.harvard.edu
Authors' address: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Boylston Hall, 3rd Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. nevins@fas.harvard.edukplaster@fas.harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , November 2008 , pp. 770 - 781
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borroff, Marianne. 2007. A landmark underspecification account of the patterning of glottal stop. Ph.D. dissertation, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1965. A Gujarati reference grammar. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George & Suthar, Babu. 2003. Gujarati. In Cardona, George & Jain, Dhanesh (eds.) The Indo-Aryan languages, 659–697. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, John. 1981. Kobon. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42.1, 25–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, Raymond J. & Poppe, Nicholas. 1963. Kirghiz manual. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Herd, Jonathon. 2005. Loanword adaptation and the evaluation of similarity. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 24, 65–116.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1932. Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio Quinquagenario, 74–84. Prague: Cercle linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 1995. Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An Optimality Theoretic approach. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Lacy, Paul de. 1997. Prosodic categorization. M.A. thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Lacy, Paul de. 2002. The formal expression of markedness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Lacy, Paul de. 2004. Markedness conflation in Optimality Theory. Phonology 21.2, 1–55.Google Scholar
Martens, Mary & Tuominen, Salme. 1977. A tentative phonemic statement of Yil in West Sepik Province. Workpapers in Papua New Guinea Linguistics 19, 29–48.Google Scholar
Parker, Stephen G. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Payne, David L. 1981. The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith. 1990. Asheninca stress patterns. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.) Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, 185–209. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pinault, Georges-Jean. 1989. Introduction au tokharien. Lalies: Actes des sessions de linguistique et de littérature 7, 3–224.Google Scholar
Plaster, Keith. 2007. The Tocharian A accent. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 99–114.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S. & Smolensky, Paul. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. [1993 version published as Technical Report #2, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.]Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2007. Markedness in phonology. In Lacy, Paul de (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 79–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlie, Perry & Schlie, Ginny. 1993. A Kara phonology. In Clifton, John M. (ed.) Data papers on New Guinea linguistics: Phonologies of Austronesian languages 2, 99–130. Papua New Guinea: SIL Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Trigo-Ferre, Rosario Lorenza. 1988. On the phonological derivation and behavior of nasal glides. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 1993. The origins of labial attraction. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 228–237.Google Scholar
Yamane-Tanaka, Noriko. 2007. *K in Conflation Theory: When a language has transguttural harmony. Ms., University of British Columbia. [ROA 899.]Google Scholar