Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
2009.
Book reviews.
Folia Linguistica,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
Lohmann, Arne
2010.
Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support: the role of processing constraints on the choice between synthetic and analytic forms.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
Arppe, Antti
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Glynn, Dylan
Hilpert, Martin
and
Zeschel, Arne
2010.
Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: five points of debate on current theory and methodology.
Corpora,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Elenbaas, Marion
2011.
More Support forMore-Support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms (Studies in Language Variation 4).
English Studies,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 2,
p.
234.
LOHMANN, ARNE
2011.
Helpvshelp to: a multifactorial, mixed-effects account of infinitive marker omission.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
499.
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2014.
Functional Partitioning and Possible Limits on Variability.
Journal of English Linguistics,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 3,
p.
218.
Hilpert, Martin
2014.
Review of Taylor (2012): The Mental Corpus. How Language is Represented in the Mind.
Functions of Language,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Berg, Thomas
2014.
Competition as a unifying concept for the study of language.
The Mental Lexicon,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
p.
338.
D'Arcy, Alexandra
and
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2015.
Not always variable: Probing the vernacular grammar.
Language Variation and Change,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 3,
p.
255.
Gouskova, Maria
Newlin-Łukowicz, Luiza
and
Kasyanenko, Sofya
2015.
Selectional restrictions as phonotactics over sublexicons.
Lingua,
Vol. 167,
Issue. ,
p.
41.
Kunter, Gero
2015.
Kersti Börjars, David Denison and Alan Scott (eds.): Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession.
Morphology,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
Scheer, Tobias
2016.
Melody-free syntax and phonologically conditioned allomorphy.
Morphology,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
341.
MONDORF, BRITTA
and
PÉREZ-GUERRA, JAVIER
2016.
Special issue on support strategies in language variation and change.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
383.
CHEUNG, LAWRENCE
and
ZHANG, LONGTU
2016.
Determinants of the synthetic–analytic variation across English comparatives and superlatives.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
559.
Gu, Qianping
2017.
A corpus-based comparative study on the superlative forms in British English and Singapore Colloquial English.
<i>WORD</i>,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 4,
p.
241.
Heller, Benedikt
Bernaisch, Tobias
and
Gries, Stefan Th.
2017.
Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes.
ICAME Journal,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
111.
Heller, Benedikt
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
and
Grafmiller, Jason
2017.
Stability and Fluidity in Syntactic Variation World-Wide.
Journal of English Linguistics,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Clahsen, Harald
Paulmann, Silke
Budd, Mary-Jane
Barry, Christopher
and
Schiller, Niels O.
2018.
Morphological encoding beyond slots and fillers: An ERP study of comparative formation in English.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 7,
p.
e0199897.
Lev-Ari, Shiri
2018.
Social network size can influence linguistic malleability and the propagation of linguistic change.
Cognition,
Vol. 176,
Issue. ,
p.
31.
CHUA, DEBORAH
2018.
Understanding comparative alternation iny-adjectives: What else might we need?.
Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 3,
p.
459.