No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Congress in the World: Benefits of the Congressional Fellowship Program for the Study of International Relations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 August 2008
Abstract
The Congressional Fellowship Program of the American Political Science Association charted new territory in the 1950s when it opened the internal workings of Congress to subsequent generations of political science scholars. Numerous programs incorporating a “Hill” experience into a variety of academic disciplines have imitated it since then. However, scholarship in the subfield of international relations has not benefited from the opportunities the program offers to the same extent as other disciplines and subfields have. I use a sample of legislative and policy matters that I encountered as a fellow in the 2006–2007 year to argue that a wide spectrum of theoretical work in international political economy would profit from insights generated by the type of direct participation the program affords. Specifically, I connect literature across subfields on institutional change, and relate how my experiences with Darfur divestment legislation, Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) legislation, and politics in a financial crisis hold the potential to enrich our understanding of the international political economy. I suggest where more direct experience with other issues by other scholars could prompt additional insights for research on U.S. foreign policy and international relations.
- Type
- Perspectives
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008
References
Abdelal, Rawi. 2007. Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Abugre, Charles, and Alexander, Nancy. 1998. Non-governmental organizations and the international monetary and financial system. In International Monetary and Financial Issues for the 1990s: Research Papers for the Group of Twenty-Four. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S.. 1962. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The politics, power, and pathologies of international organization. International Organization 53 (4): 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Changing Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 2002. Interest groups and gridlock. In Interest Group Politics, ed. Cigler, A. J. and Loomis, B. A.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Best, Jacqueline. 2005. The Limits of Transparency: Ambiguity and the History of International Finance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2004. In Defense of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, Jeffrey R. 2003. A Congress of Fellows: Fifty Years of the American Political Science Association Congressional Fellowship Program. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 2007. “Congressional Voting on Funding the International Financial Institutions.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence, and Hawes, Michael Brewster. 2006. Congressional politics of financing the International Monetary Fund. International Organization 60 (2): 367–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callan, Eoin, and Guha, Krishna. 2007. “Break-up of Rating Agencies Suggested.” Financial Times, September 27.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colton C., Rae, Nicol C., and Stack, John F., eds. 2002. Congress and the Politics of Foreign Policy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Cerny, Philip G. 2005. Plurality, pluralism, and power: Elements of pluralist analysis in an age of globalization. In Pluralism: Developments in the Theory and Practice of Democracy, ed. Eisfeld, R.. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Connelly, William F. Jr., and Pitney, John J. Jr. 1994. Congress' Permanent Minority? Republicans in the US House. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Connelly, William F. Jr., and Pitney, John J. Jr. 2004. “The Backseat Boys.” APSA Legislative Studies Section Newsletter: Extension of Remarks, January 24.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1992. Multilateralism and world order. Review of International Studies 18: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. Claire. 2002. Private international regimes and interfirm cooperation. In The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, ed. Hall, R. B. and Biersteker, T. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony, eds. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger H., and Oleszek, Walter J.. 2000. Congress and Its Members. 7thed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Committees in Congress. 3rded.Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Brendan J. 2007. Meeting the challenges of Senate leadership. PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (2): 422–24.Google Scholar
Endres, Anthony M., and Fleming, Grant A.. 2002. International Organizations and the Analysis of Economic Policy, 1919–1950. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Lawrence. 1991. Leadership in Committee: A Comparative Analysis of Leadership Behavior in the US Senate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Barney. 2000. American immigration law: A case study in the effective use of the political process. In Creating Change: Sexuality, Public Policy, and Civil Rights, ed. D'Emilio, J., Turner, W. B., and Vaid, U.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Germain, Randall D. 1997. The International Organization of Credit: States and Global Finance in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germain, Randall D. 2004. “Global Financial Governance and the Idea of the Public Sphere.” Presented at WTO and Beyond: Global Governance and the State in the 21st Century, Centre for Global Political Economy, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, July.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen. 1990. American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Michael. 2006. Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1993. Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical framework. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, ed. Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. O.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Erica R. 2003. Money talks: Supplementary financiers and International Monetary Fund conditionality. International Organization 57 (3): 551–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Erica R. 2006. Money Talks: The International Monetary Fund, Conditionality and Supplementary Financiers. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graetz, Michael J., and Shapiro, Ian. 2005. Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haufler, Virginia. 2002. Industry regulation and self-regulation: The case of labour standards. In Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy?, ed. Cooper, A. F., English, J., and Thakur, R.. New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric. 1997. Braudelian reflections on economic globalisation: The historian as pioneer. In Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, ed. Gill, S. and Mittelman, J. H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapur, Devesh. 2002. The changing anatomy of governance of the World Bank. In Reinventing the World Bank, ed. Pincus, J. R. and Winters, J. A.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1990. “Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research.” International Journal 45: 731–64.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lavelle, Kathryn C. 2004. The Politics of Equity Finance in Emerging Markets. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1999. Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mallaby, Sebastian. 2004. The World's Banker: A Story of Failed States, Financial Crises, and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2006. The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1960. US Senators and their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. 1997. Who Elected the Bankers? Surveillance and Control in the World Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. 2002. Global finance, political authority, and the problem of legitimation. In The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, ed. Hall, R. B. and Biersteker, T. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark A. 1990. Legislating Together: The White House and Capital Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. 2002. Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, I. and Milner, H. V.. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 2004. How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Tony. 1993. States, Markets and Regimes in Global Finance. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Tony. 2003. Technical collaboration and political conflict in the emerging regime for international financial regulation. Review of International Political Economy 10 (3): 520–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, Randall B., and Franklin, Grace A.. 1991. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2002. Transnational actors and world politics. In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T., and Simmons, B. A.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Post Reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, ed. 1993. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Sabatier, P. A.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1984. Interest representation: The dominance of institutions. American Political Science Review 78 (1): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1975. The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, James M., and Carter, Ralph G.. 2005. The politics of IMF reform: The Asian flu and abortion politics. In Contemporary Cases in U.S. Foreign Policy: From Terrorism to Trade, ed. Carter, R. G.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Shaiko, Ronald G. 1998. Reverse lobbying: Interest group mobilization from the White House and the Hill. In Interest Group Politics, ed. Cigler, A. J. and Loomis, B. A.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Martin, Lisa L.. 2002. International organizations and institutions. In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T., and Simmons, B. A.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Timothy J. 1994. Passing judgement: Credit rating processes as regulatory mechanisms of governance in the emerging world order. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 133–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Timothy J. 2005. The New Masters of Capitalism: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Soederberg, Susanne. 2001. The emperor's new suit: The NIFA as a reinvention of the Washington consensus. Global Governance 7 (4): 452–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streek, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Streek, W. and Thelen, K.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Putten, Maartje. June 2006. “‘Policing the World’: Accountability Mechanisms for Multilateral Financial Institutions and Private Financial Institutions.” Ph.D. diss., McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Vines, David, and Gilbert, Christopher L., eds. 2004. The IMF and Its Critics: Reform of Global Financial Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreeland, James Raymond. 1999. The IMF: Lender of Last Resort or Scapegoat? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert, and Veneroso, Frank. 1998. The Asian crisis: The high debt model versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF complex. New Left Review (March–April): 3–23.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Joseph. 2005. Making connections to the appropriations process. In The Interest Group Connection: Electioneering, Lobbying, and Policymaking in Washington, ed. Herrnson, P. S., Shaiko, R. G., and Wilcox, C.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. Woodrow. 2004. Congressional Government. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. 2006. The Globalizers: The IMF, World Bank, and Their Borrowers. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar