Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T04:46:29.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Special issue on English intensifiers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

BELÉN MÉNDEZ-NAYA*
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela

Extract

Degree modifiers, degree words or intensifiers are linguistic elements which convey the degree or the exact value of the quality expressed by the item they modify. They are typically adverbs, as in very hot, really interesting, greatly appreciate or completely absurd, but adjectives may also fulfil this function, as in utter nonsense. As noted by Bolinger (1972: 18), degree words offer a picture of ‘fevered invention’, and without any doubt constitute one of the major areas of grammatical change and renewal in English (Brinton & Arnovik 2006: 441), especially from the Early Modern English period onwards (Peters 1993). It is therefore no surprise that degree modifiers have attracted so much scholarly attention from the beginning of the twentieth century to the present day. Pioneering studies, such as those by Stoffel (1901), Borst (1902) and Fettig (1934), provide comprehensive inventories of intensifying adverbs in both modern and earlier English, as well as valuable insights into how they originated. In the last decade, however, intensifiers have become the object of renewed interest; this can be attributed in part to the development of computerized corpora, and also to advances in theoretical linguistics, more specifically in the study of semantic change and of grammaticalization processes. This renewed interest has focused, for example, on the individual histories of particular degree items as seen from the perspective of grammaticalization, on the competition of different intensifiers within a given period and across time, and on their distribution across different social groups, varieties or registers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English, 3966. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Renouf, Antoinette. 1996. Chronicling The Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72, 6996.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1972. Degree words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Borst, Eugene. 1902. Die Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschungen 10). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Arnovik, Leslie K.. 2006. The English language. A linguistic history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2006. The lady was al demonyak: Historical aspects of Adverb all. English Language and Linguistics 10 (2), 345–70.Google Scholar
Fettig, Adolf. 1934. Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen (Anglistische Forschungen 79). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Wischer, & Diewald, (eds.), 1–18.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In Wischer, & Diewald, (eds.), 143–61.Google Scholar
Macaulay Ronald, K. S. 2002. Extremely interesting, very interesting, or only quite interesting? Adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6, 398417.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory. Statistics, frequencies and beyond. In Lindquist, Hans & Mair, Christian (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 121–50. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1993. Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Stoffel, Cornelis. 1901. Intensives and downtoners (Anglistische Forchungen 1). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35 (1), 529.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Presented at the Twelfth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.). 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar