Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:50:15.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Intercropping on Nodulation and N2-fixation by Groundnut†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. T. C. Nambiar ,
M. R. Rao ,
M. S. Reddy ,
C. N. Floyd ,
P. J. Dart  and
R. W. Willey
P. T. C. Nambiar
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO 502 324, AP, India
M. R. Rao
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO 502 324, AP, India
M. S. Reddy
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO 502 324, AP, India
C. N. Floyd
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO 502 324, AP, India
P. J. Dart
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO 502 324, AP, India
R. W. Willey
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO 502 324, AP, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Nodulation and N2-fixation of groundnut were investigated in sole and intercropping systems. Intercropping with pearl millet, maize, or sorghum reduced nodulation and N2-fixation. This effect is ascribed to the shading of groundnut by the cereal component and the consequent decrease in photosynthesis of the legume canopy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bethlenfalvay, G. J. & Philips, D. A. (1977). Ontogenic interactions between photosynthesis and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes. Plant Physiology 60:419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dart, P. J., Day, J. M. & Harris, D. (1972). Assay of nitrogenase activity by acetylene reduction. International Atomic Energy Agency Publication 149, 85–100. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
Giri, G. & De, R. (1979). Effect of preceding grain legumes on dryland pearl millet in N.W. India. Experimental Agriculture 15:169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. H. & Rosas, J. C. (1980). Plant and noduledevelopment and nitrogen fixation in climbing cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris L. grown in monoculture, or associated with Zea mays L. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90:311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. J. (1974). Effects of previous crop on yield and nitrogen response of maize at Samaru, Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 10:273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nambiar, P. T. C. & Dart, P. J. (1980). Studies on nitrogen fixation by groundnut at ICRISAT. In Proceedings of an International Workshop on Groundnuts, 110–124. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Rao, M. R. & Willey, R. W. (1980). Preliminary studies of intercropping combinations based on pigeonpea or sorghum. Experimental Agriculture 16:29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. S., Floyd, C. N. & Willey, R. W. (1980). Groundnut in intercropping systems. In Proceedings of an International Workshop on Groundnuts, 133–142. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Szeicz, G., Monteith, J. L. & DosSantos, J. H. Santos, J. H. (1964). Tube solarimeters to measure radiation among plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 1:169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahua, T. A. T. & Miller, D. A. (1978). Effects of intercropping on soybean N2-fixation and plant composition of associated sorghum and soyabeans. Agronomy Journal 70:292–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping – Its importance and research needs. I. Competition and yield advantages; and II. Research approaches. Field Crop Abstracts 32:2–10 and 73–81.Google Scholar