Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:41:06.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DOUBLE OBJECTS IN SPANISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE: Acquisition of Morphosyntax and Semantics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2007

María Cristina Cuervo
María Cristina Cuervo
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This experimental study on the acquisition of the double-object construction in Spanish as a second language (L2) by a group of first language (L1) English adults investigates the role of Universal Grammar (UG) and its interaction with L1 in two modules of grammar: morphosyntax and semantics. The double-object construction in Spanish differs from its English counterpart in its morphosyntactic properties (case, clitic doubling, word order) and its semantics (interpretation of arguments and restrictions on the construction). Results show that L2 learners are sensitive to most of the morphosyntactic properties of the double-object construction but lag behind in the acquisition of its semantics. The experimental group shows evidence of UG-constrained acquisition in their sensitivity to morphosyntactic properties not instantiated in their L1 as well as in their nontarget but UG-licit analysis of the semantic restrictions of Spanish double objects. The dissociation between level of knowledge of morphosyntax and of semantics suggests that modularity of grammar is reflected in SLA exactly as it is in L1 acquisition.I am extremely grateful to Suzanne Flynn, Joyce Bruhn de Garavito, Andrew Stringfellow, Laura Colantoni, and Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux for their generous assistance in terms of comments, encouragement, sharing of materials, and statistical analyses. I also want to thank the teachers and students that participated in the study as well as three anonymous SSLA reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this article.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 583 - 615
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoun, J. & Li, Y.A. (1989). Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 141–172.Google Scholar
Baker, C.L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 533–581.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barss, A. & Lasnik, H. (1986). A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 347–354.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. & Yoshinaga, N. (1992). Broad and narrow constraints on the English dative alternation: Some fundamental differences between native speakers and foreign language learners. University of Hawai‘i Working Papers in ESL, 11, 157–199.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1988). The “no-negative evidence” problems: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 73–101). Oxford: Blackwell.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2000). The syntax of Spanish multifunctional clitics and near-native competence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2006). Knowledge of clitic doubling in Spanish: Evidence against pattern learning. In R. Slabakova, S. A. Montrul, & P. Provost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 305–333). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Cuervo, M.C. (2003a). Datives at large. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Cuervo, M.C. (2003b). Structural asymmetries but same word order: The dative alternation in Spanish. In A.-M. DiSciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry in grammar (pp. 117–144). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Demonte, V. (1995). Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus, 7, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Machobane, M., Moloi, F., & Odato, C. (2005). Learning animacy hierarchy effects in Sesotho double object applicatives. Language, 81, 421–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S.D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 677–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S.D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1998). The strong continuity hypothesis: Some evidence concerning functional categories in adult L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 61–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65, 203–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, Y.C. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis.’ Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese learners' acquisition of the narrow-range rules for the dative alternation in English. Language Learning, 47, 637–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1986). Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs and extraction. In H. Borer (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 19. The syntax of pronominal clitics (pp. 15–42). San Diego: Academic Press.
Kempchinsky, P. (2004, October). Parametric and aspectual considerations on Spanish ditransitives. Paper presented at the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
Landau, I. (1999). Possessor raising and the structure of VP. Lingua, 107, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R.K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.Google Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport-Hovav, M. (2001, April). What alternates in the dative alternation? Invited talk presented at the MIT Linguistics Colloquium, Cambridge, MA.
Masullo, P.J. (1992). Incorporation and case theory in Spanish: A crosslinguistic perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazurkewich, I. & White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition, 16, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S. (1997). Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 1–25.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2000). Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition: Toward a modular view of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). The Acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylkkänen, L. (2002). Introducing arguments. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2002). The compounding parameter in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 507–540.Google Scholar
Smith, N.V. & Tsimpli, I.M. (1995). The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Snyder, W. (1995). Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Suñer, M. (1988). The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6, 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). Dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
White, L. (1987). Markedness and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Whong-Barr, M. & Schwartz, B.D. (2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar