Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:51:48.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Which it is it? The acquisition of referential and expletive it

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2007

SUSANNAH KIRBY  and
MISHA BECKER
SUSANNAH KIRBY*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
MISHA BECKER
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
*
Address for correspondence: Susannah Kirby, Department of Linguistics, 318 Dey Hall, CB #3155, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3155, United States.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the natural order of acquisition of the proform it, comparing deictic pronoun it, anaphoric pronoun it and expletive it. Files from four children (Adam, Eve, Nina and Peter) aged 1 ; 6–3 ; 0 in the CHILDES database were coded for occurrences of NP it (here it is) and expletive it (it's raining). Occurrences of NP it were coded for whether they followed an overt discourse anaphor (anaphoric it) or not (deictic it). All children examined produce deictic and anaphoric pronoun it from the very first files, but do not produce expletive it until 2–7 months later. Following Inoue's (1991) lexical-semantic reanalysis account of the acquisition of expletive there after locative there, we propose that children acquire expletive it by reanalyzing referential pronoun it to include an expletive subtype. This reanalysis takes place when children realize that expletive it never co-occurs with any deictic/anaphoric referent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 571 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Reilly, J. & Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 21, 85–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, M. (2005). Learning verbs without arguments: the problem of raising verbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34, 165–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, G. A. (eds) Linguistic theory and psychological reality, 264–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Freidin, R. (ed.) Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 417–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.) Mechanisms of language acquisition, 171–88. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Stan, Kuczaj(IIed.) Language development: Volume 2, Language, thought and culture, 301–34. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1990). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1, 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazout, I. (2004). The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 393–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, C. & Wexler, K. (to appear). The late development of raising: what children seem to think about seem. To appear in Davies, W. & Dubinsky, S. (eds) New horizons in the analysis of control and raising (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, I. (1991). On the genesis of there-constructions. English Linguistics 8, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S. (2005). Semantics or subcases?: the acquisition of referential vs. expletive it. Unpublished master's thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1985). The Child Language Data Exchange System. Journal of Child Language 12, 271–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, E. (1994). Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition. In Gleitman, L. & Landau, B. (eds) The acquisition of the lexicon, 199–228. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, J. (1991). There, it, and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 563–67.Google Scholar
Milsark, G. (1974). Existential sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, published in 1976 in Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. (1977). ‘Mother, I'd rather do it myself’: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (eds) Talking to children: Language input and acquisition, 109–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. (1967). The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shafer, R. & Roeper, T. (2000). The role of the expletive in the acquisition of a discourse anaphor. Proceedings of the BUCLD 24, 624–32.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. (1988). Where perceiving ends and thinking begins: the apprehension of objects in infancy. In Yonas, A. (ed.) Perceptual development in infancy. Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Vol. 20, 197–234. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. (1979). What was there before there was there. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1974). The semantics of children's language. American Psychology 29, 103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, L., Kako, E., Amick, E., Carrigan, E. & Liu, K. (2005). Children's use of pointing to anchor reference during story-telling. Proceedings of the BUCLD 29, 639–50.Google Scholar
White, L. (1982). Grammatical theory and language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar