Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:06:00.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Students in Uniform: ROTC, the Citizen-Soldier, and the Civil-Military Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2007

David L. Leal
David L. Leal
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On many campuses, the sight of a student in a military uniform is common. On other campuses, the military is a distant institution with few visible affiliations. Why are some students in uniform, what are they doing, what are the costs and benefits to the individual, and what are the implications for the nation? This article will discuss these questions, along with a brief history of the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) program and its relationship to the often-discussed civil-military gap.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 479 - 483
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axe, David. 2007. Army 101: Inside ROTC in a Time of War. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt, and David L. Leal. 2007. “Latinos, Military Service, and Support for Bush and Kerry in 2004.” American Politics Research 35: 224–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Bryan. 2007. “West Point Grads Exit Service at High Rate: War's Redeployments Thought a Major Factor.” Boston Globe, April 11. Available at: www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/west_point_grads_exit_service_at_high_rate/. Accessed April 19, 2007.Google Scholar
Bianco, William, and Jamie Markham. 2001. “ Vanishing Veterans: The Decline in Military Service in the U.S. Congress.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter D. Feaver and Richard H. Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cep, Casey N. 2007. “The Undergraduate: The War at Home.” Harvard Magazine (March–April).Google Scholar
Cohen, Eliot A. 2005. “Neither Fools Nor Cowards.” Wall Street Journal, May 13.Google Scholar
Coumbe, Arthur. 1999. “Why ROTC? The Debate over Collegiate Military Training, 1969–1973.” Air & Space Power Journal. Available at: www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/cc/coumbe.html. Accessed April 19, 2007.Google Scholar
Cummings, Craig, Jason Dempsey, and Robert Shapiro. 2005. “Partisan Pressure: Political Ideology and Party Affiliations of West Point Cadets.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Jason, and Robert Shapiro. 2006. “Political Partisanship in the Army.” Presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Jason, Robert Shapiro, and Craig Cummings. 2006. “Citizenship and Service: Political and Social Attitudes of Active-Duty Army and Cadets at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point.” Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Desch, Michael. 2001. “ Explaining the Gap: Vietnam, the Republicanization of the South, and the End of the Mass Army.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter Feaver and Richard Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter, and Richard Kohn. 2001. “ Conclusion: The Gap and What It Means for American National Security.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter Feaver and Richard Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter, Richard Kohn, and Lindsay Cohn. 2001. “ The Gap Between Military and Civilian in the United States in Perspective.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter Feaver and Richard Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gronke, Paul, and Peter D. Feaver. 2001. “ Uncertain Confidence: Civilian and Military Attitudes about Civil-Military Relations.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter Feaver and Richard Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammill, John, David R. Segal, and Mady Wechsler Segal. 1995. “Self-Selection and Parental Socioeconomic Status as Determinants of the Values of West Point Cadets.” Armed Forces & Society 22: 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole. 2001. “ Of Chasm and Convergence: Attitudes and Beliefs of Civilians and Military Elites at the Start of the New Millennium.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter Feaver and Richard Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Greg. 2007. “A Retreat From Big Cities Hurts ROTC Recruiting.” Wall Street Journal, February 27.Google Scholar
Janowitz, Morris. 1964. The Military in the Political Development of New Nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Gregory B. Markus. 1977. “The Effect of Military Service on Political Attitudes: A Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 71: 131–47.Google Scholar
Johnson, Charles Jr. 2002. African Americans and ROTC: Military, Naval and Aeroscience Programs at Historically Black Colleges, 1916–1973. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.Google Scholar
Karsten, Peter, et al. 1998. “ ROTC, Mylai, and the Volunteer Army.” In The Military and Society, eds. Peter Karsten. New York: Garland [originally published in 1971 in Foreign Policy].Google Scholar
Kennedy, Gregory C., and Keith Neilson, eds. 2002. Military Education: Past, Present, and Future. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Marc. 2006–2007. “Storming the Ivory Tower: The Military's Return to American Campuses.” Parameters: U.S. Army War College Quarterly 36: 44–57.Google Scholar
Neiberg, Michael S. 2000. Making Citizen-Soldiers: ROTC and the Ideology of American Military Service. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ricks, Thomas E. 1997. Making the Corps: Sixty-one Men Came to Parris Island to Become Marines, Not All of Them Made It. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Segal, David, Peter Freedman-Doan, Jerald Bachman, and Patrick O'Malley. 2001. “ Attitudes of Entry-Level Enlisted Personnel: Pro-Military and Politically Mainstreamed.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter Feaver and Richard Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stancik, Col William C., and R. Cargill Hall. 1984. “Air Force ROTC: Its Origins and Early Years.” Air University Review 35 (5): 38–51. Available at: www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1984/jul-aug/jul-aug84.html. Accessed March 15, 2007.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ward. 2007. “ROTC and the Catholic Campus.” Armed Forces & Society 33: 224–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigley, Russell F. 2001. “ The American Civil-Military Cultural Gap: A Historical Perspective, Colonial Times to the Present.” In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, eds. Peter Feaver and Richard Kohn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar