Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:19:44.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From hiatus to diphthong: the evolution of vowel sequences in Romance*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2007

Ioana Chitoran  and
José Ignacio Hualde
Ioana Chitoran
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
José Ignacio Hualde
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Romance languages show hiatus and diphthongal realisations of inherited iV sequences of rising sonority (e.g. ia). We study five Romance varieties with different degrees of contrast between the two realisation types: Romanian, with a diphthong–hiatus contrast, Spanish, with a weaker contrast, French, with no contrast (all diphthongs), and European and Brazilian Portuguese, with no contrast (all hiatus). We show that the different degrees of synchronic contrast are related to three independent factors: (i) a general articulatory tendency for [iV] hiatus to resolve to diphthongs, due to the relative stability of diphthongal articulations; (ii) a structural ‘attractor’ effect of pre-existing [jV] diphthongs in a language, from different historical sources; and (iii) prosodic lengthening effects which inhibit the shift from hiatus to diphthong, supported by phonetic studies of durational patterns across the five languages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , May 2007 , pp. 37 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguilar, Lourdes (1999). Hiatus and diphthong: acoustic cues and speech situation differences. Speech Communication 28. 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. (1981). Why phonology isn't ‘natural’. LI 12. 493–539.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2006). A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32. 117–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (to appear). Consonant epenthesis: natural and unnatural histories. In Good, Jeff (ed.) Language universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David, Weenink (2006). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis, Goldstein (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis, Goldstein (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. JPh 18. 299–320.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis, Goldstein (1992). Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis, Goldstein (1995). Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In Bell-Berti, Fredericka & Raphael, Lawrence (eds.) Producing speech: contemporary issues. For Katherine Sufford Harris. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics Press. 19–33.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis, Goldstein (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parlée 5. 25–34.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabré, Teresa & Pilar, Prieto (2004). Prosodic and analogical effects in lexical glide formation in Catalan. Probus 16. 113–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabré, Teresa & Pilar, Prieto (2007). Exceptional hiatuses in Spanish. In Martínez-Gil, Fernando & Colina, Sonia (eds.) Optimality-theoretic studies in Spanish phonology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casali, Roderic F. (1997). Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: which vowel goes? Lg 73. 493–533.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana (2002). The phonology of Romanian: a constraint-based approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana (2003a). Gestural timing and the glide percept in Romanian. In Solé, et al. (2003). 3013–3016.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana (2003b). Inter-gestural timing between vocalic gestures as a function of syllable position: acoustic evidence from Romanian. In Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Speech Production. Sydney. 25–30.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana & José, Ignacio Hualde (2002). Variability in hiatus resolution: a phonetic study of [CiV] sequences in two Romance languages. Poster presented at the 8th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Yale University & Haskins Laboratories.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana & José, Ignacio Hualde (2005). On the origin and evolution of the contrast between tautosyllabic and heterosyllabic sequences of vocoids in Romance. Paper presented at Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong & Patricia, A. Keating (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. JPh 29. 155–190.Google Scholar
Colina, Sonia (1999). Reexamining Spanish glides: analogically conditioned variation in vocoid sequences in Spanish dialects. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, & Martínez-Gil, (1999). 121–134.Google Scholar
Cubberley, P. (2002). Russian: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. Corpus del español. www.corpusdelespanol.org.Google Scholar
de Chene, Brent & Stephen, R. Anderson (1979). Compensatory lengthening. Lg 55. 505–535.Google Scholar
Face, Timothy L. & Scott, M. Alvord (2004). Lexical and acoustic factors in the perception of the Spanish diphthongs vs. hiatus contrast. Hispania 87. 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Letânia (in preparation). High initial tones and plateaux in the Ibero-Romance languages. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile (2001). Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. JPh 29. 109–135.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Patricia, A. Keating (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. JASA 101. 3728–3740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frota, Sónia (2000). Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: phonological phrasing and intonation. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia (2003). The phonological status of initial peaks in European Portuguese. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2. 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, Sónia & Marina, Vigário (2001). On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: the European/Brazilian Portuguese case. Probus 13. 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, Marisol (in preparation). Diphthongization of non-high vowel sequences in Latin American Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & Fernando, Martínez-Gil (eds.) (1999). Advances in Hispanic linguistics: papers from the 2nd Hispanic linguistics symposium. Vol. 1. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William S. (1980). Introduction to Russian phonology and word structure. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change. In Christie, William M. Jr. (ed.) Current progress in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland. 95–105.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (1991). Basque phonology. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (1992). On Spanish syllabification. In Campos, Héctor & Martínez-Gil, Fernando (eds.) Current studies in Spanish linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 475–493.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (1997). Spanish /i/ and related sounds: an exercise in phonemic analysis. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 27:2. 61–79.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (1999). Patterns in the lexicon: hiatus with unstressed high vowels in Spanish. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, & Martínez-Gil, (1999). 182–197.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio (2005). The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio & Ioana, Chitoran (2003). Explaining the distribution of hiatus in Spanish and Romanian. In Solé, et al. (2003). 1683–1686.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio & Mónica, Prieto (2002). On the diphthong/hiatus contrast in Spanish: some experimental results. Linguistics 40. 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, Larry M. (1975). Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1976). Phonologization. In Juilland, Alphonse (ed.) Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Vol. 2: Phonology. Saratoga: Anma Libri. 407–418.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1931). Principes de phonologie historique. Reprinted (1962) in Selected writings. Vol. 1: Phonological studies. The Hague: Mouton. 202–220.Google Scholar
Kelm, Orlando R. (1989). Temporal aspects of speech rhythm which distinguish Mexican Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1995). The phonological basis of sound change. In Goldsmith, John A. (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 640–670.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Anna Laura & Giulio, Lepschy (1988). The Italian language today. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leyden, Klaske van (2004). Prosodic characteristics of Orkney and Shetland dialects: an experimental approach. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (eds.) Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 403–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1998). Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structure. In Hurford, James R., Studdert-Kennedy, Michael & Knight, Chris (eds.) Approaches to the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 242–264.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Paul M. (1987). From Latin to Spanish. Vol. 1: Historical phonology and morphology of the Spanish language. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Marin, Stefania (2005). Complex nuclei in Articulatory Phonology: the case of Romanian diphthongs. In Gess, Randall S. & Rubin, Edward J. (eds.) Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics: selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Stefania (in preparation). Vowel to vowel coordination, diphthongs, and Articulatory Phonology. PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena & Ernesto, d'Andrade (2000). The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena, Ana, Maria Brito, Inês, Duarte & Isabel, Hub Faria (eds.) (2003). Gramática da Língua Portuguesa. 5th edn. Lisbon: Caminho.Google Scholar
Nam, Hosung (to appear). A competitive, coupled oscillator model of moraic structure. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.) Laboratory phonology 9. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Navarro, Tomás Tomás (1948). Manual de pronunciación española. 19th edn. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene, Vogel (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha (2006). The computational nature of language learning and evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F. (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1989). Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In Breivik, Leiv Egil & Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.) Language change: contributions to the study of its causes. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 173–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph (2002). A history of the Spanish language. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. (1984). Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Lg 60. 320–342.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46. 115–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Mary, E. Beckman (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Adam, P. Leary (2005). Against formal phonology. Lg 81. 927–964.Google Scholar
Price, Glanville (1984). The French language: present and past. 2nd edn. London: Grant & Cutler.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio (1993). Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (1973). Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Recasens, D. (1991). Timing in Catalan. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 4. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence. 230–233.Google Scholar
Rickard, Peter (1974). A history of the French language. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Round, Erich (2004). Against a simplistic frequency-based analysis: the role of phonological structure in the diachronic reduction of function words. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass: MTT Press.Google Scholar
Simonet, Miquel (2005). Prosody and syllabification intuitions of [CiV] sequences in Spanish and Catalan. In Frota, Sónia, Vigário, Marina & Freitas, Maria João (eds.) Prosodies: with special reference to Iberian languages. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) (2003). Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Spinu, L. (2006). Perceptual properties of palatalization in Romanian. Paper presented at the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Stavrou, Christopher (1947). Brazilian-Portuguese pronunciation. Philadelphia: David McKay Co.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2000). Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics–phonology boundary. In Broe, Michael & Pierrehumbert, Janet (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 313–334.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1987). The sounds of French: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, Alice E. & Stefanie, Shattuck-Hufnagel (2000). Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English. JPh 28. 397–440.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew B. (2004). Self-organization and categorical behavior in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew B. (2006). Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23. 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew B. (2007). Feedback and regularity in the lexicon. Phonology 24. 147–185 (this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles D. (2000). Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change 12. 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley (1929). Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 40. 1–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar