Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:00:57.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical investigation of the flow over a model transonic turbine blade tip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Andrew P. S. Wheeler*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Richard D. Sandberg
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
Email address for correspondence: aw329@cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are used to investigate the unsteady flow over a model turbine blade tip at engine-scale Reynolds and Mach numbers. The DNS are performed with an in-house multiblock structured compressible Navier–Stokes solver. The particular case of a transonic tip flow is studied since previous work has suggested that compressibility has an important effect on the turbulent nature of the separation bubble at the inlet to the tip–casing gap and subsequent flow reattachment. The flow is simulated over an idealized tip geometry where the tip gap is represented by a constant-area channel with a sharp inlet corner to represent the pressure side edge of the turbine blade. The effects of free-stream disturbances, cross-flow and the pressure side boundary layer on the tip flow aerodynamics and heat transfer are studied. For ‘clean’ inflow cases we find that even at engine-scale Reynolds numbers the tip flow is intermittent in nature, i.e. neither laminar nor fully turbulent. The breakdown to turbulence occurs through the development of spanwise streaks with wavelengths of approximately 15 %–20 % of the gap height. Multidimensional linear stability analysis confirms the two-dimensional base state to be most unstable with respect to spanwise wavelengths of 25 % of the gap height. The linear stability analysis also shows that the addition of cross-flows with 25 % of the streamwise gap exit velocity increases the stability of the tip flow. This is confirmed by the DNS, which also show that the turbulence production is significantly reduced in the separation bubble. For the case when free-stream disturbances are added to the inlet flow, viscous dissipation and the rapid acceleration of the flow at the inlet to the tip–casing gap cause significant distortion of the vorticity field and reductions of turbulence intensity as the flow enters the tip gap. The DNS results also suggest that the assumption of the Reynolds analogy and a constant recovery factor are not accurate, in particular in regions where the skin friction approaches zero while significant temperature gradients remain, such as in the vicinity of flow reattachment.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bunker, R. S. 2004 Blade Tip Heat Transfer and Cooling Techniques. (VKI Lecture Series 2004-02) , Von Karman Institute.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. H., Nordstrm, J. & Gottlieb, D. 1999 A stable and conservative interface treatment of arbitrary spatial accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 148 (2), 341365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Dawes, W. N. & Hodson, H. P.1993 A numerical and experimental investigation of turbine tip gap flow. In 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 93-2253.Google Scholar
Coull, J. D., Atkins, N. R. & Hodson, H. P. 2014 Winglets for improved aerothermal performance of high pressure turbines. J. Turbomach. 136, 091007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Maesschalck, C., Lavagnoli, S. & Paniagua, G. 2014 Blade tip shape optimization for enhanced turbine aerothermal performance. J. Turbomach. 136, 041016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Maesschalck, C., Lavagnoli, S. & Paniagua, G. 2015 Blade tip carving effects on the aerothermal performance of a transonic turbine. J. Turbomach. 137, 021005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, N. W. 2004 Aerothermal Implications of Shroudless and Shrouded Blades. (VKI Lecture Series 2004-02) , Von Karman Institute.Google Scholar
Horton, H.1968 Laminar separation bubbles in two and three dimensional incompressible flow. PhD thesis, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen Mary College, University of London.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. J., Wheeler, A. P. S. & Ainsworth, R. W. 2015 An experimental and computational study of tip clearance effects on a transonic turbine stage. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 56, 335343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L., Sandberg, R. D. & Sandham, N. D. 2010 Stability and receptivity characteristics of a laminar separation bubble on an aerofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 648, 257296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kays, W. & Crawford, M. 1980 Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., Carpenter, M. & Lewis, R. 2000 Low-storage, explicit Runge–Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. Appl. Numer. Maths 35 (3), 177219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. & Gruber, A. 2008 Reduced aliasing formulations of the convective terms within the Navier–Stokes equations for a compressible fluid. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (3), 16761700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. & Elward, K. M. 1993 Shock formation in overexpanded tip leakage flow. J. Turbomach. 115, 392399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J., Moore, J. G., Henry, G. S. & Chaudhry, U. 1989 Flow and heat transfer in turbine tip gaps. J. Turbomach. 111, 301309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, R., Pichler, R., Chen, L., Johnstone, R. & Michelassi, V. 2015 Compressible direct numerical simulation of low-pressure turbines. Part I. Methodology. J. Turbomach. 137, 051011,1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, R. D. 2012 Numerical investigation of turbulent supersonic axisymmetric wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 702, 488520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, R. D. & Fasel, H. F. 2006 Numerical investigation of transitional supersonic axisymmetric wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, R. D., Sandham, N. & Suponitsky, V. 2012 DNS of compressible pipe flow exiting into a coflow. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 35, 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, R. D. & Sandham, N. D. 2006 Nonreflecting zonal characteristic boundary condition for direct numerical simulation of aerodynamic sound. AIAA J. 44 (2), 402405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. & Coleman, G. 1997 Numerical study of a separation bubble with heat transfer. Eur. J. Mech. B 16, 169189.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. & Strelets, M. 2000 Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 403, 329349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, A. & Sandberg, R. D. 2012 Direct numerical simulations of a transonic turbine tip flow. In 13th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines, University of Tokyo, Japan, ISUAAAT13.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. P. S., Atkins, N. R. & He, L. 2011 Turbine blade tip heat transfer in low speed and high speed flows. J. Turbomach. 133 (4), 041025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, A. P. S., Sandberg, R. D., Sandham, N. D., Pichler, R., Michelassi, V. & Laskowski, G. 2016 Direct numerical simulations of a high-pressure turbine vane. J. Turbomach. 138, 071003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. & He, L. 2013 Tip-shaping for HP turbine blade aerothermal performance management. J. Turbomach. 135, 051025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q., He, L. & Rawlinson, A. 2014 Effects of inlet turbulence and end-wall boundary layer on aerothermal performance of a transonic turbine blade tip. Trans. ASME J. Engng Gas Turbines Power 136, 052603.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., O’Dowd, D. O., He, L., Wheeler, A. P. S., Ligrani, P. M. & Cheong, B. C. Y. 2011 Overtip shock wave structure and its impact on turbine blade tip heat transfer. J. Turbomach. 133 (4), 041001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar