Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:07:56.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ALUMINIUM TOLERANCE OF OAT CULTIVARS UNDER HYDROPONIC AND ACID SOIL CONDITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2015

I. C. NAVA ,
C. A. DELATORRE ,
M. T. PACHECO ,
P. L. SCHEEREN  and
L. C. FEDERIZZI
I. C. NAVA*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Agronomy School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501-970, Brazil
C. A. DELATORRE
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Agronomy School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501-970, Brazil
M. T. PACHECO
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Agronomy School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501-970, Brazil
P. L. SCHEEREN
Affiliation:
National Wheat Research Center, Embrapa, Rodovia BR-285, Km 294, Passo Fundo, RS, 99001, Brazil
L. C. FEDERIZZI
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Agronomy School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501-970, Brazil
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: itamar.nava@ufrgs.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Aluminium toxicity is an important abiotic factor limiting the growth and yield of oat plants (Avena sativa L.) and other cultivated species. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the response of oat cultivars at the reproductive stage to aluminium under acid soil conditions and to compare with the responses observed at seedling stage under hydroponic conditions. In the soil, the damage to the above-ground part of the plant was estimated by the morphological response to aluminium, shoot length, shoot dry mass and plant height and, to the below-ground part of the plant as the length of roots and root dry mass. In hydroponics, the primary root regrowth was used to define the level of tolerance. The comparison of the results obtained in acid soil with those obtained in hydroponics demonstrated that both conditions produced essentially the same responses. The use of hydroponic solution can be a valuable tool for phenotyping large populations, especially useful for breeding programmes located in regions were aluminium is not present at toxic levels in the soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 224 - 236
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angela, H. (2009). Root decisions. Plant Cell and Environment 32:628–640.Google Scholar
Castilhos, G., Farias, J. G., de Bernardi Schneider, A., de Oliveira, P. H., Nicoloso, F. T., Chitolina Schetinger, M. R. and Delatorre, C. A. (2011). Aluminium-stress response in oat genotypes with monogenic tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 74:114–121.Google Scholar
de Andrade, L. R. M., Barros, L. M. G., Echevarria, G. F., Velho do Amaral, L. I., Cotta, M. G., Rossatto, D. R., Haridasan, M. and Franco, A. C. (2011). Al-hyperaccumulator Vochysiaceae from the Brazilian Cerrado store aluminium in their chloroplasts without apparent damage. Environmental and Experimental Botany 70:37–42.Google Scholar
Delhaize, E., James, R. A. and Ryan, P. R. (2012). Aluminium tolerance of root hairs underlies genotypic differences in rhizosheath size of wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown on acid soil. The New Phytologist 195:609–619.Google Scholar
de Souza, C. A. N. (1998). Classification of brazilian wheat cultivars for aluminium toxicity in acid soils. Plant Breeding 117:217–221.Google Scholar
Foy, C. D. (1996). Tolerance of durum wheat lines to acid aluminium-toxic subsoil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 19:1381–1394.Google Scholar
Furlani, P. R. and Furlani, A. M. C. (1991). Aluminium tolerance and phosphorus efficiency in maize and rice: independent traits. Bragantia 50:331–340.Google Scholar
Garvin, D. F. and Carver, B. F. (2003). Role of the genotype in tolerance to acidity and aluminium toxicity. In Handbook of Soil Acidity, 1–53 (Ed Rengel, Z.). New York, CAB International.Google Scholar
Howeler, R. H. and Cadavid, L. F. (1976). Screening of rice cultivars for tolerance to Al-toxicity in nutrient solutions as compared with a field screening method. Agronomy Journal 68:551–555.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-F., Yamaji, N., Chen, Z. and Ma, J. F. (2012). A tonoplast-localized half-size ABC transporter is required for internal detoxification of aluminium in rice. The Plant Journal 69:857–867.Google Scholar
Huang, C. F., Yamaji, N., Mitani, N., Yano, M., Nagamura, Y. and Ma, J. F. (2009). A bacterial-type ABC transporter is involved in aluminium tolerance in rice. Plant Cell 21:655–667.Google Scholar
Illes, P., Schlicht, M., Pavlovkin, J., Lichtscheidl, I., Baluska, F. and Ovecka, M. (2006). Aluminium toxicity in plants: internalization of aluminium into cells of the transition zone in arabidopsis root apices related to changes in plasma membrane potential, endosomal behaviour, and nitric oxide production. Journal of Experimental Botany 57:4201–4213.Google Scholar
Kerridge, P. C., Dawson, M. D. and Moore, D. P. (1971). Separation of degrees of aluminium tolerance in wheat. Agronomy Journal 63:586–590.Google Scholar
Kochian, L., Piñeros, M. and Hoekenga, O. (2005). The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminium resistance and toxicity. Plant and Soil 274:175–195.Google Scholar
Kochian, L. V., Hoekenga, O. A. and Piñeros, M. A. (2004). How do plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminium tolerance and phosphorus efficiency. Annual Review in Plant Biology 55:459–493.Google Scholar
Kroon, H. d. and Visser, E. J. W. (2003). Root ecology. In Ecological Studies, 381. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Liao, H., Wan, H., Shaff, J., Wang, X., Yan, X. and Kochian, L. V. (2006). Phosphorus and Aluminium Interactions in soybean in relation to aluminium tolerance. Exudation of specific organic acids from different regions of the intact root system. Plant Physiology 141:674–684.Google Scholar
Nava, I. C., Delatorre, C. A., Duarte, I., Pacheco, M. T. and Federizzi, L. C. (2006). Inheritance of aluminium tolerance and its effects on grain yield and grain quality in oats (Avena sativa L.). Euphytica 148:353–358.Google Scholar
Oliveira, P. H., Federizzi, L. C., Milach, S. C. K., Gotuzzo, C. and Sawasato, J. T. (2005). Inheritance in oat (Avena sativa L.) of tolerance to soil aluminium toxity. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 5:125–133.Google Scholar
Poschenrieder, C., Amenós, M., Corrales, I., Doncheva, S. and Brarceló, J. (2009). Root behavior in response to aluminium toxicity. In Plant-Environment Interactions, 21–44 (Ed Baluska, F.). Heidelberg, Springer.Google Scholar
Radmer, L., Tesfaye, M., Somers, D., Temple, S., Vance, C. and Samac, D. (2012). Aluminium resistance mechanisms in oat (Avena sativa, L.). Plant and Soil 351:121–134.Google Scholar
Ramos-Díaz, A., Brito-Argáez, L., Munnik, T. and Hernández-Sotomayor, S. M. T. (2007). Aluminium inhibits phosphatidic acid formation by blocking the phospholipase C pathway. Planta 225:393–401.Google Scholar
Ryan, P. R., Raman, H., Gupta, S., Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, Y. and Delhaize, E. (2010). The multiple origins of aluminium resistance in hexaploid wheat include Aegilops tauschii and more recent cis mutations to TaALMT1. The Plant Journal 64:446–455.Google Scholar
Sánches-Chacón, C. D., Federizzi, L. C., Milach, S. C. K. and Pacheco, M. T. (2000). Genetic variability and inheritance of aluminium toxicity tolerance in oat. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 35:1797–1808.Google Scholar
Sivaguru, M., Fujiwara, T., Samaj, J., Baluska, F., Yang, Z., Osawa, H., Maeda, T., Mori, T., Volkmann, D. and Matsumoto, H. (2000). Aluminium-induced 1–3-B-D-glucan inhibits cell-to-cell trafficking of molecules through plasmodesmata. A new mechanism of aluminium toxicity in plants. Plant Physiology 2:991–1006.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. J. (1995). Overcoming barriers to understanding the cellular basis of aluminium resistance. Plant and Soil 171:89–103.Google Scholar
Wagner, C. W., Milach, S. C. K. and Federizzi, L. C. (2001). Genetic inheritance of aluminium tolerance in oat. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 1:22–26.Google Scholar
Wight, C. P., Kibite, S., Tinker, N. A. and Molnar, S. J. (2006). Identification of molecular markers for aluminium tolerance in diploid oat through comparative mapping and QTL analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112:222–231.Google Scholar