Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:15:22.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

YIELD, NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY AND GRAIN QUALITY IN DURUM WHEAT AS AFFECTED BY NITROGEN FERTILIZATION UNDER A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2015

ANITA IERNA ,
GRAZIA MARIA LOMBARDO  and
GIOVANNI MAUROMICALE
ANITA IERNA*
Affiliation:
Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree, CNR, Sezione di Catania, Via Gaifami 18, 95126 Catania, Italy
GRAZIA MARIA LOMBARDO
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Di3A, Università degli Studi di Catania, Via Valdisavoia 5, 95123 Catania, Italy
GIOVANNI MAUROMICALE
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Di3A, Università degli Studi di Catania, Via Valdisavoia 5, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: anita.ierna@cnr.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Limited information is available concerning the influence of nitrogen fertilization jointly on yield response, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and grain quality of durum wheat under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions. The study focused on evaluating, through a systematic study, over three seasons in southern Italy the effects of three nitrogen fertilization rates (0, 80 and 160 kg N ha−1 – N0, N80 and N160), on grain yield, yield components, nitrogen efficiency indices and grain quality characteristics of three durum wheat genotypes (‘Creso’, ‘Trinakria’ and ‘Line 25’) from different breeding eras to achieve a more sustainable fertilization management of the durum wheat crop. We found that nitrogen fertilization at 80 kg N ha−1 was able to maximize the yield performances (2.1 t ha−1 year–1) of the crop and keep NUE index at an acceptable level (16.3 kg kg−1). On the other hand, nitrogen fertilization at 160 kg N ha−1 improved grain quality measured through protein (up to 14.3%) and dry gluten concentration (up to 12.8%), but had a detrimental effect on grain yield and nitrogen efficiency. Among the genotypes studied, ‘Trinakria’ showed the greatest potential to utilize nitrogen fertilization to improve grain yield and NUE (at N80) and quality (at N160), ‘Line 25’ made good use of N80 both for yield and quality, whereas ‘Creso’ proved wholly unresponsive to nitrogen. The effect of N fertilization on grain yield and N use efficiency depends on rainfall distribution, giving the best results when about 80% of total rainfall occurred from sowing to heading. Overall, our data show that in seasons with regular rainfall in quantity and distribution, combining no more than 80 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilization with genotypes characterized by a more efficient response to nitrogen, is a useful tool to improve the agronomic and quality performance of the crop, ensuring, at the same time, a more environment-friendly nitrogen fertilization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 314 - 329
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abad, A., Lloveras, J. and Michelena, A. (2004). Nitrogen fertilization and foliar urea effects on durum wheat yield and quality and on residual soil nitrate in irrigated Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research 87:257–269.Google Scholar
Albrizio, R., Todorovic, M., Maticb, T. and Stellacci, A. M. (2010). Comparing the interactive effects of water and nitrogen on durum wheat and barley grown in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 115:179–190.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. K. (1985). Grain yield responses of barley and durum wheat to split nitrogen applications under rainfed conditions in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 12:191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschman, H. (1973). Distribution and peculiarity of Mediterranean ecosystems. In Mediterranean Type Ecosystems, Ecological Studies, 11–19 (Eds Di Castri, F. and Mooney, H. A.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
Basso, B., Cammarano, D., Troccoli, A., Chen, D. and Ritchie, J. T. (2010). Long-term wheat response to nitrogen in a rainfed Mediterranean environment: field data and simulation analysis. European Journal of Agronomy 33:132–138.Google Scholar
Boggini, G., Doust, M. A., Annichiarico, P. and Pecetti, L. (1997). Yielding ability, yield stability and quality of exotic durum wheat germplasm in Sicily. Plant Breeding 116:541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliandro, A., Cavazza, L., Marzi, V. and Pacucci, G. (1981). Effect of high nitrogen fertilizer levels on wheat in a mediterranean climate. Rivista di Agronomia 15:237–244.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. A., Zentner, R. P., Selles, F., McConkey, B. G. and Dyck, F. B. (1993). Nitrogen management for spring wheat grown annually on zero-tillage: yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal 85:107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossani, C. M., Slafer, G. A. and Savin, R. (2009). Yield and biomass in wheat and barley under a range of conditions in a Mediterranean site. Field Crops Research 112:205–213.Google Scholar
Cossani, C. M., Slafer, G. A. and Savina, R. (2012). Nitrogen and water use efficiencies of wheat and barley under a Mediterranean environment in Catalonia. Field Crops Research 128:109–118.Google Scholar
Debaeke, P., Aussenac, T., Fabre, J. L., Hilaire, A., Pujol, B. and Thuries, L. (1996). Grain nitrogen content of winter bread wheat (Triticm aestivum L.) as related to crop management and to the previous crop. European Journal of Agronomy 5:273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, J. W. and Quick, J. S. (1983). A modified screening test for rapid estimation of a gluten strength in early generation durum wheat breeding lines. Cereal Chemistry 60:315–318.Google Scholar
Ehdaie, B. and Waines, J. G. (2001). Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on dry matter and nitrogen partitioning in bread and durum wheat. Field Crops Research 73:47–61.Google Scholar
Ercoli, L., Lulli, L., Arduini, I., Mariotti, M. and Masoni, A. (2011). Durum wheat grain yield and quality as affected by S rate under Mediterranean conditions. European Journal of Agronomy 35:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercoli, L., Lulli, L., Mariotti, M., Masoni, A. and Arduini, I. (2008). Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen supply and soil water availability. European Journal of Agronomy 28:138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercoli, L., Masoni, A., Pampana, S., Mariotti, M. and Arduini, I. (2013). As durum wheat productivity is affected by nitrogen fertilization management in Central Italy. European Journal of Agronomy 44:38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2010). Agriculture and Rural Development. Evaluation of measures relating to the durum wheat sector within the context of the Common Agricultural Policy. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/wheat; last accessed on January, 2013.Google Scholar
Fois, S., Schlichting, L., Marchylo, B., Dexter, J., Motzo, R. and Giunta, F. (2011). Environmental conditions affect semolina quality in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum L.) cultivars with different gluten strength and gluten protein composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91:2664–2673.Google Scholar
Fuertes-Mendizábal, T., Aizpurua, A., González-Moro, M. B. and Estavillo, J. M. (2010). Improving wheat breadmaking quality by splitting the N fertilizer rate. European Journal of Agronomy 33:52–61.Google Scholar
Gariglio, N. F., Pilatti, R. A. and Baldi, B. L. (2000). Using nitrogen balance to calculate fertilization in strawberries. HortTechnology 10:147–150.Google Scholar
Garrido-Lestache, E., Lopez-Bellido, R. J. and López-Bellido, L. (2005). Durum wheat quality under Mediterranean conditions as affected by N rate, timing and splitting, N form and S fertilization. European Journal of Agronomy 23:265–278.Google Scholar
Giambalvo, D., Ruisi, P., Di Miceli, G., Frenda, A. S. and Amato, G. (2010). Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen fertilizer recovery of durum wheat genotypes as affected by interspecific competition. Agronomy Journal 102:707–715.Google Scholar
Gooding, M. J. and Davies, W. P. (1997). Wheat Production and Utilization. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Halitligil, M. B., Akın, A., Bilgin, N., Deniz, Y., Ögretir, K., Altınel, B. and Işık, Y. (2000). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and nitrogen and water use efficiencies of winter wheat (durum and bread) varieties grown under conditions found in Central Anatolia. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31:175–182.Google Scholar
ICC. International Association of Cereal Chemistry (1986). Standard Methods of the ICC. Vienna: ICC.Google Scholar
Ierna, A., Mauro, R. P. and Mauromicale, G. (2012). Improved yield and nutrient efficiency in two globe artichoke genotypes by balancing nitrogen and phosphorus supply. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32:773–780.Google Scholar
Jeuffroy, M. H. and Bouchard, C. (1999). Intensity and duration of nitrogen deficiency on wheat grain number. CropScience 39:1385–1393.Google Scholar
Karam, F., Kabalan, R., Breidi, J., Rouphael, Y. and Oweis, T. (2009). Yield and water production functions of two durum wheat cultivars grown under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes. Agricultural Water Management 96:603–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassam, A. H. (1981). Climate, soil and land resources in north use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Africa and West Asia. Plant Soil 58:1–29.Google Scholar
Labuschagne, M. T., Meintjes, G. and Groenewald, F. P. C. (2006). The influence of different nitrogen treatments on the size distribution of protein fractions in hard and soft wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 43:315–321.Google Scholar
Landi, A. (1995). Durum wheat, semolina and pasta quality characteristics for an Italian food company. In Durum Wheat Quality in the Mediterranean Region. Options Méditerranéennes, Series A 22, 33–42 (Eds Di Fonzo, N., Kaan, F. and Nachit, M.). Zaragoza: CIHEAM.Google Scholar
Lerner, S. E., Seghezzo, M. L., Molfese, E. R., Ponzio, N. R., Cogliotti, M. and Rogers, W. J. (2006). N and S-fertilizer effects on grain composition, industrial quality and end-use in durum wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 44:2–11.Google Scholar
Lombardo, G. M. and Tuttobene, R. (2000). Productivity of durum wheat and nitrogen fertilization in the inland hills of Sicily. Rivista di Agronomia 2:306–309.Google Scholar
López Bellido, L., López-Bellido, R. J. and López-Bellido, F. J. (2006). Fertilizer nitrogen efficiency in durum wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions: effect of split application. Agronomy Journal 98:55–62.Google Scholar
López-Bellido, L., López-Bellido, R. J. and Redondo, R. (2005). Nitrogen efficiency in wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions as affected by split nitrogen application. Field Crops Research 94:86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Bellido, L., Muňoz-Romero, V., Benítez-Vega, J., Fernández-García, P., Redondo, R. and López-Bellido, R. J. (2012). Wheat response to nitrogen splitting applied to a vertisols in different tillage systems and cropping rotations under typical Mediterranean climatic conditions. European Journal of Agronomy 43:24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahaut, B. (1997). Comment èvalue-t-on la qualité d’un blé dur? Blé dur. Objectife qualité. ITCF, ONIC, Paris, 49.Google Scholar
Moll, R. H., Kamprath, E. J. and Jackson, W. A. (1982). Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal 74:562–564.Google Scholar
Motzo, R., Fois, S. and Giunta, F. (2004). Relationship between grain yield and quality of durum wheats from differente ras of breeding. Euphytica 140:147–154.Google Scholar
Nachit, M. M. (1998). Durum wheat research to improve dryland productivity in the Mediterranean region. In Proceedings of the SEWANA Durum Research Network, 1–15 (Eds Nachit, M. M., Baum, M., Porceddu, E., Monneveux, P. and Picard, E.). Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA Google Scholar
Novoa, R. and Loomis, R. S. (1981). Nitrogen and plant production. Plant and Soil 58:177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oweis, T., Pala, M. and Ryan, J. (1999). Management alternatives for improved durum wheat production under supplemental irrigation in Syria. European Journal of Agronomy 11:255–266.Google Scholar
Pampana, S., Masoni, A., Ercoli, L., Mariotti, M., and Arduini, I. (2013). Effects of nitrogen splitting and source on durum wheat. Cereal Research Communication 41:338–347.Google Scholar
Ryan, J., Ibrikci, H., Sommer, R. and McNeill, A. (2009). Nitrogen in rainfed and irrigated cropping systems in the Mediterranean region. Advances in Agronomy 104:53–136.Google Scholar
Ryan, J., Nsarellah, N. and Mergoum, M. (1997). Nitrogen fertilization of durum wheat cultivars in the rainfed area of Morocco. Biomass, yield and quality considerations. Cereal Research Communication 25:85–90.Google Scholar
Simane, B., Struik, P. C., Nachit, M. M. and Peacock, J. M. (1993). Ontogenic analysis of field components and yield stability of durum wheat in water-limited environments. Euphytica 71:211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Società Italiana Scienza del Suolo (1985). Standardized Methods of Soil Analysis. Bologna: Edagricole.Google Scholar
Sowers, K. E., Miller, B. C. and Pan, W. L. (1994). Optimizing grain yield in soft white winter wheat with split nitrogen applications. Agronomy Journal 86:1020–1025.Google Scholar
Todari, G. (1989). Frumento (Triticum spp.). In Herbaceous crops, 15–88 (Eds Baldoni, R. and Giardini, E. L.). Bologna: Italy.Google Scholar
Tuttobene, R., Lombardo, G. M., Abbate, V. and Foti, S. (1985). Changes of growth indices in Triticum durum Desf. and Vicia faba L. in relation to different methods of sampling and calculation methods. Rivista di Agronomia 19:325–332.Google Scholar
USDA (1999). Soil taxonomy. In Agricultural Handbook, vol. 436, 869, Washington DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14:415–421.Google Scholar