Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:29:24.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Religion promotes a love for thy neighbour: But how big is the neighbourhood?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Ryan McKay
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdomryantmckay@mac.comhttp://tinyurl.com/ryan-mckay
Harvey Whitehouse
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, School of Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdom.harvey.whitehouse@anthro.ox.ac.ukhttp://www.harveywhitehouse.com/

Abstract

The term prosocial has often been taken to mean nice or neighbourly, but many acts that further in-group interests are hostile and aggressive towards out-groups. According to Norenzayan et al., religion's ability to foster social cohesion within religious groups has been a key factor in the human transition to complex societies. But what are the prospects for nonparochial “religious prosociality”?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batson, C. D. & Powell, A. A. (2003) Altruism and prosocial behavior. In: Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology, ed. Millon, T., Lerner, M. J. & Weiner, I. B., pp. 463–84. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency (2015) World. In: The World Factbook. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html.Google Scholar
Clobert, M., Saroglou, V. & Hwang, K.-K. (2015) Buddhist concepts as implicitly reducing prejudice and increasing prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41(4):513–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, J. A. C., Haque, O. S. & Rand, D. G. (2015) How good is the Samaritan, and why? An experimental investigation of the extent and nature of religious prosociality using economic games. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2484659.Google Scholar
Galen, L. W. (2012) Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin 138:876906. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartung, J. (1995) Love thy neighbor: The evolution of in-group morality. Skeptic 3:8698.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. A., Memon, R., Alladin, A., Cohen, A. B. & Okun, M. A. (2015b) Who helps the Samaritan? The influence of religious vs. secular primes on spontaneous helping of members of religious outgroups. Journal of Cognition and Culture 15:217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K. & Finkle, C. (2012) Differences in attitudes towards outgroups in religious and non-religious contexts in a multi-national sample: A situational context priming study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 22(1):19. doi:10.1080/10508619.2012.634778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, R. & Whitehouse, H. (2015) Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin 141(2):447–73. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norenzayan, A. (2013) Big Gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. & Shariff, A. F. (2008) The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 322:5862. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1158757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S. & Hernandez, J. I. (2010) Principles of religious prosociality: A review and reformulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4:574–90. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00286.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddish, P., Bulbulia, J. & Fischer, R. (2013) Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? Religion, Brain and Behavior 4:319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, M. (1996) The origins of virtue. Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2013a) Religion, cohesion, and hostility. In: Religion, intolerance and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation, ed. Clarke, S., Powell, R. & Savulescu, J., pp. 3647. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2013b) Three wishes for the world (with comment). Cliodynamics: The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History 4(2):281323.Google Scholar