Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T19:33:12.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are gods and good governments culturally and psychologically interchangeable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Robert N. McCauley
Robert N. McCauley*
Affiliation:
Center for Mind, Brain, and Culture, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. philrnm@emory.eduhttps://scholarblogs.emory.edu/robertnmccauley/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cognitive by-product theorists maintain that standard cognitive development facilitates the acquisition of religion. Citing secularization, Norenzayan et al. qualify that theory, proposing that gods and good governments are psychologically and culturally interchangeable. That contention, though, occasions questions about the psychological dynamics involved, about what qualifies as religiosity, and about asymmetries between gods and good governments in the face of catastrophes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e19
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyer, P. (2001) Religion explained. The evolutionary origins of religious thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bulbulia, J. (2013) The arts transform the cognitive science of religion. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1:141–60.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (2005) Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking.Google Scholar
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J. & Laurin, K. (2008) God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95:18–35.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. N. (2011) Why religion is natural and science is not. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sibley, C. G. & Bulbulia, J. (2012) Faith after an earthquake: A longitudinal study of religion and perceived health before and after the 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand earthquake. PLOS ONE 7:e49648. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049648.Google Scholar
Talmont-Kaminski, K. (2013) Religion as magical ideology: How the supernatural reflects rationality. Acumen.Google Scholar