Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:46:23.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remittances and Social Spending

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2015

DAVID DOYLE
DAVID DOYLE*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
*
David Doyle is Associate Professor of Politics, Department of Politics and International Relations and Fellow of Latin American Centre, University of Oxford, St Hugh's College, St Margaret's Road, Oxford, OX2 6 LE (david.doyle@politics.ox.ac.uk).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Remittances are a significant source of foreign exchange for developing economies. I argue that remittances, due to their compensation and insurance functions, will increase the general income level and economic security of recipients, thereby reducing their perceived income risk. Over time, this will dampen demand from recipients for government taxation and social insurance. Therefore, I expect increases in income remitted to an economy to result in reduced levels of social welfare transfers at the macro-level. This dynamic can help us to understand spending patterns in developing democracies, and the absence of demand for social security transfers in countries with high levels of inequality and economic insecurity. I test this argument with a sample of 18 Latin American states, over the period 1990 to 2009, and subject the central causal mechanism to a battery of statistical tests. The results of these tests provide strong support for this argument.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 109 , Issue 4 , November 2015 , pp. 785 - 802
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, Pablo, Calderón, Cesar, Fajnzylber, Pablo, and Lopez, Humberto. 2008. What is the Impact of Remittances on Poverty and Inequality in Latin America? World Development 36 (1): 89–114.Google Scholar
Adida, Claire L., and Girod, Desha M.. 2011. Do Migrants Improve their Hometowns? Remittances and Access to Public Services in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies 44 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Faisal Z. 2012. The Perils of Unearned Foreign Income: Aid, Remittances, and Government Survival. American Political Science Review 106: 146–65.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Faisal Z. 2013. Remittances, Clientelism, and Electoral Preferences: Theory and Evidence from the Dominican Republic. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina, and Pozo, Susan. 2006. Remittances as Insurance: evidence from Mexican immigrants. Journal of Population Economics 19 (2): 227–54.Google Scholar
Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina, and Pozo, Susan. 2011. Remittances and Income Smoothing. INSIDE Paper 27, Institute for Economic Analysis, CSIC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, Javier, and Meseguer, Covadonga. 2012. Collective Remittances and the State: The 3×1 Program in Mexican Municipalities. World Development 40 (1): 206–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avelino, George, Brown, David S., and Hunter, Wendy. 2005. The Effects of Capital Mobility, Trade Openness, and Democracy on Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 625–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avendano, Rolando, Gaillard, Nobert, and Nieto-Parra, Sebastián. 2011. Are Working Remittances Relevant for Credit Rating Agencies? Review of Development Finance 1 (1): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy, and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2011. The Latin American Left's Mandate: Free Market Policies, Economic Performance, and Voting Behavior in 18 Countries. World Politics 63 (1): 43–77.Google Scholar
Barajas, Adolfo, Chami, Ralph, Fullenkamp, Connel, Gapen, Michael, and Montiel, Peter. 2009. Do Workers’ Remittances Promote Economic Growth? IMF Working Paper No. 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, and Ok, Efe A.. 2001. Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The POUM Hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 447–87.Google Scholar
Bewley, R. A. 1979. The Direct Estimation of the Equilibrium Response in a Linear Dynamic Model. Economics Letters 3 (4): 357–61.Google Scholar
Brown, David S., and Hunter, Wendy. 1999. Democracy and Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–1992. American Political Science Review 93 (4): 779–90.Google Scholar
Cameron, David. 1978. The Expansion of the Public Economy. American Political Science Review 72 (4): 1243–61.Google Scholar
CEPALSTAT. 2014. Base de Datos de Estadísticas e Indicadores Sociales, Económicos y Medio Ambientales. Santiago: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Chami, Ralph, Barajas, Adolfo, Cosimano, Thomas, Fullenkamp, Connel, Gapen, Michael, and Montiel, Peter. 2008. The Macroeconomic Consequences of Remittances. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Chami, Ralp, Hakura, Dalia, and Montiel, Peter. 2009. Remittances: An automatic stabilizer? IMF Working Paper 91. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, K. A. 1997. The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chinn, Menzie D., and Ito, Hiro. 2008. A New Measure of Financial Openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10 (3): 309–22.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1997. A Classification of Latin American Political Parties. Kellogg Institute, Working Paper No. 244.Google Scholar
De Boef, Susan, and Keele, Luke. 2008. Taking Time Seriously. American Journal of Political Science. 52 (1): 184–200.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. Model Specification in Instrumental Variable Analysis. Political Analysis, 16 (3): 290–302.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, Pablo, and López, J. Humberto. 2007. Close to Home: The Development Impact of Remittances in Latin America. Working Paper 48911. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Franzoni, Juliana Martínez. 2008. Welfare Regimes in Latin America: Capturing Constellations of Markets Families and Policies. Latin American Politics and Society. 50 (2): 67–100.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane, and Ansell, Ben. 2012. Preferences in Context: Micro Preferences, Macro Contexts, and the Demand for Social Policy. Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 162454.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 2008. Development, Democracy and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, Kaufman, Robert, and Long, James D.. 2013. Income, Occupation and Preferences for Redistribution in the Developing World. Studies in Comparative International Development 48 (2): 113–40.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha. 2012. Redistributive Preferences: Progressivity and the Informal Welfare State in Latin America. Presented at the Latin American Studies Association, San Francisco, May.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyn, and Stephens, John D. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Stephens, John D., Mustillo, Thomas, and Pribble, Jennifer. 2008. Latin America and the Caribbean Political Dataset, 1945–2001. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Mustillo, Thomas, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. Politics and Social Spending in Latin America. Journal of Politics 70 (2): 420–36.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Humala, Ollanta. 2012. Mensaje del Presidente Constitucional del Perú ante El Congresso Nacional, July 28. Museo del Congreso y de la Inquisición.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, and Tingley, Dustin. 2010. A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis. Psychological Methods. 15 (4): 309–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Casual Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review 105 (4): 765–89.Google Scholar
Inchauste, Gabriela, and Stein, Ernesto. 2013. Financing the Family: Remittances to Central America in a Time of Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
International Food Policy Research Institute. 2013. Statistics of Public Expenditure for Economic Development (SPEED) Database. Available at http://www.ifpri.org/book-39/ourwork/programs/priorities-public-investment/speed-database (accessed December 2013).Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2001. Government Finance Statistics Manual 2001. Washington: IMF.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, Devesh. 2004. Remittances: The New Development Mantra? G-24 Discussion Paper Series, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2001. Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-section Analysis, 1973–97. World Politics. 53: 553–87.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004. Free Market Democracy and the Chilean and Mexican Countryside. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LAPOP. 2014. The AmericasBarometer by the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), www.LapopSurveys.org (accessed June 2014).Google Scholar
Latinobarómetro 2009. Latin American Public Opinion Data, http://www.latinobarometro.org (accessed December 2012).Google Scholar
Leblang, David. 2011. Harnessing the Diaspora: Dual Citizenship, Migrant Remittances and Return. University of Virginia working paper.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy. 1998. Social Remittances: Migration Driven Local-Level Forms of Cultural Diffusion. International Migration Review 32 (4): 926–48.Google Scholar
López-Córdova, Ernesto. 2006. Globalization, Migration and Development: The Role of Mexican Migrant Remittances. INTAL-ITD Working Paper No. 20. Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Hagopian, Frances. 2005. Introduction, in Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott (eds). The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2005. Social Protection around the World: external insecurity, state capacity and domestic political cleavages. Comparative Political Studies. 38 (6): 623–51.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela, and Carnes, Matthew E.. 2009. Social Policy in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Review of Political Science 12: 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, and Jaggers, Keith. 2007. POLITY IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2007. Vienna, Virginia, USA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Mayer, Thierry, and Zignago, Soledad. 2011. Notes on CEPII's Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database. Paris, France: CEPII Working Paper No. 2011–25.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 2011. Social Policies in Latin America: Causes, Characteristics and Consequences. In Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics, eds. Kingstone, Peter and Yashar, Deborah. New York: Routledge, Chap. 13, pp. 200–24.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89: 914–27.Google Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga, and Aparicio, Francisco. 2012. Supply or Demand? Migration and Political Manipulation in Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47 (4): 411–40.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, Angela. 2013. Political Investment: Remittances and Elections. British Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 799–820.Google Scholar
Pfutze, Tobias. 2013. Clientelism Versus Social Learning: The Electoral Effects of International Migration. International Studies Quarterly. Published online first.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2009. From Economic Crisis to Reform: IMF programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Hilllel, and Docquier, Frédéric. 2006. The Economics of Migrant's Remittances. In Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, eds. Kolm, Serge-Christophe and Ythier, Jean Mercier. Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier, Chap. 17, pp. 1135–200.Google Scholar
Ratha, Dilip, and Silwal, Ana. 2012. Remittance Flows in 2011 – an update. Migration and Development Brief No. 18. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2009. Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-Level Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42 (7): 855–81.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2011. Social Policy by Popular Demand. World Politics 63 (2): 271–99.Google Scholar
Rehm, Philipp, Hacker, Jacob S., and Schlesinger, Mark. 2012. Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State. American Political Science Review 106 (2): 386–406.Google Scholar
Rickard, Stephanie J. 2012. Welfare versus Subsidies: Governmental Spending Decisions in an Era of Globalization. Journal of Politics 74 (4): 1171–83.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Edgard R. 1996. International Migrants’ Remittances in the Philippines. The Canadian Journal of Economics 29 (2): pp. S427–32.Google Scholar
Rudra, Nita. 2004. Openness, Welfare Spending, and Inequality in the Developing World. International Studies Quarterly 48 (3): 683–709.Google Scholar
Rudra, Nita. 2008. Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, David A. 2010. Migrant Remittances and Exchange Rate Regimes in the Developing World. American Political Science Review 104 (2): 307–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, David A. 2012. The Family Channel: Migrant Remittances and Government Finance. MIT Working Paper No. 2012–23.Google Scholar
Sovey, Allison J., and Green, Donald P.. 2011. Instrumental Variables Estimation in Political Science: A Readers’ Guide. American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 188–200.Google Scholar
Staiger, Douglas, and Stock, James H.. 1997. Instrumental Variables with Weak Instruments. Econometrica 65 (3): 557–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Ernesto, and Caro, Lorena. 2013. Ideology and Taxation in Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper Series, IDB-WP-407.Google Scholar
Stock, James H., and Yogo, Motohiro. 2005. Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, eds. Andrews, Donald W. K. and Stock, James H.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press: 80–108.Google Scholar
Tyburski, Michael D. 2012. The Resource Curse Reversed? Remittances and Corruption in Mexico. International Studies Quarterly, 56: 339–50.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik. 2006. Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles and Social Spending in the Developing World. International Organization Spring: 433–69.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik, and Ahlquist, John. 2011. Development, Trade and Social Insurance. International Studies Quarterly 55: 125–49.Google Scholar
Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Benoit, Ken. 2009. Presidents, Parties and Policy Competition. Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1435–47.Google Scholar
Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Doyle, David. 2014. Profiling the Electorate: Ideology and Attitudes of Right-wing Voters. In The Resilience of the Latin American Right. Eds. Luna, Juan Pablo and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2011. Migration and Remittances Factbook, 2nd ed. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2014. World Development Indicators, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development: Washington DC.Google Scholar
Yang, Dean, and Choi, HwaJung. 2007. Are Remittances Insurance? Evidence from rainfall shocks in the Philippines. The Economic Review 21 (2): 219–48.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Doyle supplementary material

Doyle supplementary material 1

Download Doyle supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 589.1 KB