Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:03:17.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing generativist and constructivist accounts of the use of the past tense form in early child Japanese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2015

TOMOKO TATSUMI  and
JULIAN M. PINE
TOMOKO TATSUMI*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
JULIAN M. PINE
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool and ESRC International Centre for Language and Communicative Development (LuCiD)
*
Address for correspondence: Tomoko Tatsumi, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, England. e-mail: Tomoko.Tatsumi@liverpool.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated children's early use of verb inflection in Japanese by comparing a generativist account, which predicts that the past tense will have a special default-like status for the child during the early stages, with a constructivist input-driven account, which assumes that children's acquisition and use of inflectional forms reflects verb-specific distributional patterns in their input. Analysis of naturalistic data from four Japanese children aged 1;5 to 2;10 showed that there was substantial by-verb variation in the use of inflectional forms from the earliest stages of verb use, and no general preference for past tense forms. Correlational and partial correlational analyses showed that it was possible to predict the proportional frequency with which the child produced verbs in past tense versus other inflectional forms on the basis of differences in the proportional frequency with which the verb occurred in past tense form in the child's input, even after controlling for differences in the rate at which verbs occurred in past tense form in input averaged across the caregivers of the other children in the sample. When taken together, these results count against the idea that the past tense has a special default-like status in early child Japanese, and in favour of a constructivist input-driven account of children's early use of verb inflection.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 43 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1365 - 1384
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The first author would like to thank the Japanese Student Services Organization (JASSO) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan for the PhD scholarship which made the current study possible. Julian Pine is a Professor in the International Centre for Language and Communicative Development (LuCiD) at the University of Liverpool, for which the support of the Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L008955/1] is gratefully acknowledged.

References

REFERENCES

Aguado-Orea, J. & Pine, J. M. (2015). Comparing different models of the development of verb inflection in early child Spanish. PloS One 10(3), e0119613.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. L. & Kidd, E. J. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42, 239–73.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. I (pp. 373–524). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (2005). Morphological typology and first language acquisition: some mutual challenges. In Booij, G., Guevara, E., Ralli, A., Sgroi, S. & Scalise, S. (eds), Morphology and linguistic typology: online proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 143–88.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M. & Gobet, F. (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language 37, 643–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinstead, J., De la Mora, J., Vega-Mendoza, M. & Flores, B. (2009). An elicited production test of the Optional Infinitive stage in child Spanish. In Crawford, J., Otaki, K. & Takahashi, M. (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (pp. 36–45). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T. & Hyams, N. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua 106(1), 81–112.Google Scholar
Ishii, T. (1999). The JUN Corpus, unpublished.Google Scholar
Kato, S., Sato, Y., Chikuda, Y., Miyoshi, R., Sakai, Y. & Koizumi, M. (2003). ‘Root infinitives’: Nihongo karano kensho [‘Root infinitives’: from the perspective of Japanese]. Tohoku University Linguistics Journal 12, 113–27.Google Scholar
Kim, M. & Phillips, C. (1998). Complex verb constructions in child Korean: overt markers of covert functional structure. In Greenhill, A., Hughes, M., Littlefield, H. & Walsh, H. (eds), Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 430–41). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 43, 1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analysing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (1992). Wh-questions of the third kind: the strange use of Wa-questions in Japanese children. Bulletin of Aichi Shukutoku Junior College 31, 151–5.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (1995). The Aki corpus: longitudinal speech data of a Japanese boy aged 1·6–2·12. Bulletin of Aichi Shukutoku Junior College 34, 183–91.Google Scholar
Miyata, S. (2000). The Tai Corpus: longitudinal speech data of a Japanese boy aged 1;5·20–3;1·1. Bulletin of Aichi Shukutoku Junior College 39, 77–85.Google Scholar
Murasugi, K. (2015). Root infinitive analogues in child Japanese. In Nakayama, M. (ed.), Handbook of Japanese psycholinguistics, Vol. 9 (pp. 117–47). Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Murasugi, K., Nakatani, T. & Fuji, C. (2009). The roots of root infinitive analogues: the surrogate verb forms common in adult and child grammars. Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Online Supplement.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R. & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language 25, 95–120.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language 19, 491–557.Google Scholar
Räsänen, S. H. M., Ambridge, B. & Pine, J. M. (2014). Infinitives or bare stems? Are English-speaking children defaulting to the highest frequency form? Journal of Child Language 41, 756–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Räsänen, S. H. M., Ambridge, B. & Pine, J. M. (in press). An elicited-production study of inflectional verb morphology in child Finnish. Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Rispoli, M. J. (1981). The emergence of verb and adjective tense–aspect inflections in Japanese. Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1993/1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: the case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3, 371–93.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. F., Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. M. & Theakston, A. L. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language 30, 609–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salustri, M. & Hyams, N. (2003). Is there an analogue to the RI stage in the null subject languages? In Beachley, B., Brown, A. & Conlin, F. (eds), Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 692–703). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1998). The emergence of tense–aspect morphology in Japanese: universal predisposition? First Language 18, 281–309.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense–aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language 71, 743–62.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Miyata, S. (2006). Does past tense marking indicate the acquisition of the concept of temporal displacement in children's cognitive development? First Language 26, 45–66.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2. (pp. 1157–256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smiley, P. & Huttenlocher, J. (1995). Conceptual development and the child's early words for events, objects and persons. In Tomasello, M. & Merriman, W. (eds), Beyond names for things: the acquisition of verbs (pp. 21–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2004). Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax. Journal of Child Language 31, 61–99.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(4), 156–63.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D. (2004). Sampling children's spontaneous speech: How much is enough? Journal of Child Language 31, 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation in child grammar. In Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D (eds), Verb movement (pp. 305–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106, 23–79.Google Scholar
Yang, C. (2013). Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 6324–7.Google Scholar