Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:24:12.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relationship of the Post-Ovulatory Phase of The Menstrual Cycle to Total Cycle Length

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Judith Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
John Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Summary

The basal body temperature was recorded by 1353 healthy fertile women aged 18 to 49 years inclusive through 12,247 cycles. The post-ovulatory (hyperthermic) phase of the cycle was significantly longer by 1·31 days in cycles with a slow or staircase rise of temperature than in cycles with an acute rise. The hyperthermic phase increased in length in a rectilinear fashion from 10 to 13 days as the total cycle length rose from 22 to 29 days; over total cycle lengths from 29 to 33 days the length of the hyperthermic phase remained around 13 days.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arey, L.B. (1939) The degree of normal menstrual irregularity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 37, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, T.K., Macisco, J.J. Jr, & Parker, M.P. (1967) Some methodological problems in the analysis of menstrual data. Int. J. Fert. 12, 67.Google ScholarPubMed
Collett, M.E., Wertenberger, G.E. & Fiske, V.M. (1954) The effect of age upon the pattern of the menstrual cycle. Fert. Steril. 5, 437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Döring, G.K. (1967) Über die Corpus Luteum-Insuffizienz, die haufigste hormonelle Sterilitat sursache bei der Frau. Fortschr. Med. 85, 644.Google Scholar
Fluhmann, C.F. (1957) Irregularity of the stages of the menstrual cycle. West. J. Surg. Obst. Gynec. 65, 265.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldzieher, J.W., Henkin, A.E. & Hamblen, E.C. (1967) Characteristics of the normal menstrual cycle. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 54, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W.H. (1965) Parameters of the menstrual cycle and the efficiency of rhythm methods of contraception. Popul. Stud. 19, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W.H. (1968) A note of correction with reference to parameters of the menstrual cycle and the efficiency of the rhythm methods of contraception. Popul. Stud. 22, 281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knaus, H. (1929) Eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Ovulationstermines. Zentbl. Gynäk. 53, 2193.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. (1963) Thermal changes in the normal menstrual cycle. Br. med. J. i, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. (1967) The Infertile Period: Principles and Practice. Darton, Longman & Todd, London.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, S., Nogami, Y. & Oukuri, S. (1962) Statistical studies on menstruation; a criticism of the definition of normal menstruation. Gunma J. med. Sci. 11, 294.Google Scholar
Ogino, K. (1930) Ovulationstermin und Kanzeptionstermin. Zentbl. Gynäk. 54, 464.Google Scholar
Potter, R.G., Burch, T.K. & Matsumoto, S. (1967) Long cycles, late ovulation and calendar rhythm. Int. J. Fert. 12, 127.Google ScholarPubMed
Vollman, R.F. (1956) The degree of variability of the length of the menstrual cycle in correlation with age of woman. Gynaecologia, 142, 310.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation Technical Report Series No.360. Biology of Fertility Control by Periodic Abstinence. Geneva, 1967.Google Scholar