Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-18T13:50:24.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of preflood nitrogen rate and midseason nitrogen timing on flooded rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2000

R. CARRERES
Affiliation:
Departamento del Arroz, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Sueca, 46410-Valencia, Spain
J. SENDRA
Affiliation:
Departamento del Arroz, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Sueca, 46410-Valencia, Spain
R. BALLESTEROS
Affiliation:
Departamento del Arroz, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Sueca, 46410-Valencia, Spain
J. GARCÍA DE LA CUADRA
Affiliation:
Servicio de Análisis Agroalimentario, Burjasot, 46100-Valencia, Spain

Abstract

A field study was conducted to investigate the agronomic performance, nitrogen (N) efficiencies, yield components and yield of rice in Spain for different nitrogen treatments. The experimental variants were six preflood N rates (0, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 kg/ha) and three topdressing patterns: (i) non- topdressed, (ii) topdressed with 50 kg N/ha at mid-tillering stage (MT) and (iii) topdressed at panicle initiation stage (PI). The N status of the plant was measured at different growing stages to determine whether a chlorophyll meter would be useful in making N sidedress recommendations. The results showed that grain yield increased with increasing amounts of preflooding N fertilizers up to 100 kg N/ha. The main effect was on panicle number per unit ground area. The effect of additional N supply on yield components and grain yield depended on application timing. Split applications of N did not improve the agronomic efficiency but reduced days to maturity and lodging and increased the harvest index value. Split applications increased grain yield when the total N rate was 150 kg/ha with the second supply at PI. There was a significant but not very good relationship between N content and chlorophyll content (SPAD) values. The regression equation differed significantly depending on growth stage. The SPAD value may determine the need for N topdressing at MT stage, but not at PI. However, the relationship between SPAD value and the rice yield increase from N topdressing application was not very good.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)