Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:16:32.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EUROPEAN LANGUAGE POLICY: ASSESSMENT, LEARNING, AND THE CEFR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Abstract

This article describes how language policy is formed at a European level, focusing on the Common European Framework of Reference for Language (CEFR). The CEFR's prominent role in assessment has led to criticisms of its adequacy as a model for learning and fears that it is being used as an instrument of centralization and harmonization. First, we argue for studying the CEFR's effect on language policy as a case of impact, as this concept is understood within language assessment. We refer to experience with Asset Languages, developed as part of the United Kingdom's national languages strategy. Second, we agree with many commentators who insist on the framework's “flexible and context-amenable” nature. If use of the CEFR is made prescriptive and closed, it indeed becomes a straitjacket. What is needed is engagement with the complexity of specific contexts. We introduce the European Survey on Language Competences, a European Union (EU) initiative scheduled for 2011, which will further raise the profile of the CEFR as an assessment framework. This project should contribute to achieving comparability of measures and standards across languages. At the same time it underlines the need to develop contextualized, practical ways of realizing the CEFR's potential as a framework for teaching and learning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED REFERENCES

Coste, D. (2007). Contextualising uses of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Paper presented at Council of Europe Policy Forum on use of the CEFR, Strasbourg 2007. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/SourceForum07/D-Coste_Contextualise_EN.docGoogle Scholar
European Commission (n.d.). Multilingualism [home page]. Retrieved from, http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/eu-language-policy/doc112_en.htmGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004–2006 COM(2003) 449 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2003/com2003_0449en01.pdfGoogle Scholar

OTHER REFERENCES

Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 115129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 659663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, G. (2007). The CEFR and education policies in Europe. Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 669672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2008). Standards-based assessment in the USA: Social and educational impact. Presentation at 3rd ALTE International Conference, Cambridge, April 10–12, 2008.Google Scholar
Coste, D. (2007). Contextualising uses of the common European framework of reference for languages. Paper presented at Council of Europe Policy Forum on use of the CEFR, Strasbourg, 2007. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/SourceForum07/D-Coste_Contextualise_EN.docGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (1954). European Cultural Convention. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/018.htmGoogle Scholar
Council of the European Union (2000). Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000. Presidency Conclusions. Retrieved from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htmGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2003). Manual for relating examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages [Preliminary pilot version]. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2006). Survey on the use of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Synthesis of results. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/Surveyresults.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2007). From linguistic diversity to plurilingual education: Guide for the development of language education policies in Europe. Council of Europe: Strasbourg. Retrieved from: http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/Guide_Main_Beacco2007_EN.docGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2008). Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the use of the Council of Europe's Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the promotion of plurilingualism. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2008). Ethics and professionalism. In Shohamy, E. (Ed.), Language testing and assessment: Vol. 7. Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 429443). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
DfES (2002). Languages for All: Languages for Life. Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved from: http://www.cilt.org.uk/nls/index.htmGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004–2006 COM(2003) 449 final. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2003/com2003_0449en01.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fleming, M. (2008). Languages of schooling within a European framework for languages of education: Learning, teaching, assessment. Conference report. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Prague2007_ConferReport_EN.docGoogle Scholar
Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The Common European Framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1 (4), 253266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulcher, G. (2008, July). Testing times ahead? Liaison Magazine, (1).Google Scholar
Hawkey, R. A. H. (2006). Impact theory and practice: Studies of the IELTS test and Progetto Lingue 2000, Studies in Language Testing 24. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press and Cambridge ESOL.Google Scholar
Little, D., & Perclova, R. (2001). European language portfolio guide for teachers and teacher trainers. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Little, D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the making of supranational language education policy. Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 645653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyniuk, W., & Noijons, J. (2007). Executive summary of results of a survey on the use of the CEFR at national level in the Council of Europe Member States. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Linguistic/Source/Survey_CEFR_2007_EN.docGoogle Scholar
Nuffield Languages Programme. (2002). A learning ladder for languages: Possibilities, risks and benefits. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://languages.nuffieldfoundation.org/filelibrary/pdf/learning_ladder.pdfGoogle Scholar
Saville, N. (2005). An interview with John Trim at 80. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2 (4), 263288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville, N. (2009). Developing a model for investigating the impact of language assessment within educational contexts by a public examination provider. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar