Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:15:14.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geographical patterns of diversity for qualitative and quantitative traits in the pigeonpea germplasm collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Hari D. Upadhyaya ,
R.P.S. Pundir ,
C.L.L. Gowda ,
K.N. Reddy  and
Sube Singh
Hari D. Upadhyaya*
Affiliation:
Genetic Resources, Crop Improvement, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
R.P.S. Pundir
Affiliation:
Genetic Resources, Crop Improvement, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
C.L.L. Gowda
Affiliation:
Genetic Resources, Crop Improvement, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
K.N. Reddy
Affiliation:
Genetic Resources, Crop Improvement, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
Sube Singh
Affiliation:
Genetic Resources, Crop Improvement, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: h.upadhyaya@cgiar.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analysed the patterns of variation for 14 qualitative and 12 quantitative traits in 11,402 pigeonpea germplasm accessions from 54 countries, which were grouped into 11 regions. Semi-spreading growth habit, green stem colour, indeterminate flowering pattern and yellow flower colour were predominant among qualitative traits. Primary seed colour had maximum variability and orange colour followed by cream were the two most frequent seed colours in the collection. Variances for all the traits were heterogeneous among regions. The germplasm accessions from Oceania were conspicuous by short growth duration, short height, fewer branches, pods with fewer seeds, smaller seed size and lower seed yields. The accessions from Africa were of longer duration, taller, with multi-seeded pods and larger seeds. The germplasm diversity indicated by Shannon–Weaver diversity index (H′) pooled over all traits, was highest for Africa (0.464±0.039) and lowest for Oceania (0.337±0.037). The cluster analysis based on three principal component scores using 12 quantitative traits revealed formation of three clusters: cluster 1 includes accessions from Oceania; cluster 2 from India and adjacent countries; and cluster 3 from Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Europe, Africa, America and the Caribbean countries. Pigeonpea-rich countries such as Myanmar, Uganda, and others like Bahamas, Burundi, Comoros, Haiti and Panama are not adequately represented in the collection, and need priority attention for germplasm exploration.

Keywords

Cajanus cajandiversitygeographical regionspigeonpeaqualitative traitsquantitative traits
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , December 2005 , pp. 331 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, DN (1974) Pigeonpea. In: Hutchinson J (ed.) Evolutionary Studies in World Crops: Diversity and Change in the Indian Subcontinent. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1998) The state of ex-situ conservation. In: The State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.Rome:FAO pp. 83–136.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2003) FAO database, http://apps.fao.org.Google Scholar
Githiri, SM, Kimani, PM and Saxena, KB (1991) Natural out-crossing in dwarf pigeonpea. Euphytica 53(1): 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazarika, GN, Singh, VP and Malik, BPS (1986) Divergence analysis in pigeonpea. Crop Improvement 13: 113–116.Google Scholar
IBPGR/ICRISAT (1993) Descriptors for Pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR)/International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Keuls, M (1952) The use of the “Studentized” range in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1: 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khin Myint, Kyi, Tin Mar, Than, Win, Twat, Yi Yi, Myint, Ito, M and Irie, K (2001) Characterization and preliminary evaluation of pigeonpea germplasm in Myanmar. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter 8: 27–28.Google Scholar
Levene, H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Oklin I (ed.) Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honour of Harold Hotelling. Stanford, CA: University Press, pp. 278–292.Google Scholar
Newman, D (1939) The distribution of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathak, GN (1970) Red gram. In: Kachroo P and Arif M (eds) Pulse Crops of India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research. pp. 14–53.Google Scholar
Ram, Dhari, Kumar, K, Tomer, YS and Kharb, RPS (1997) Evaluation of pigeonpea germplasm for yield and its component traits. Annals of Biology 13: 221–223.Google Scholar
Reddy, LJ, Upadhyaya, HD, Gowda, CLL and Sube, Singh (2005) Development of core collection in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] using geographic and qualitative morphological descriptors Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satpute, RG, Khare, D and Das, P (1994) Collection, evaluation, and maintenance of pigeonpea germplasm from Madhya Pradesh, India. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter 1: 26–28.Google Scholar
Shannon, CE and Weaver, W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, D, Reddy, LJ, Green, JM and Jain, KC (1981) International adaptation of pigeonpeas. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpeas, Vol. 1, 15–19 Patancheru, A.P., India: ICRISAT 15–19 December 1980 71–81.Google Scholar
Singh, L, Gupta, SC and Faris, DG (1990) Pigeonpea: breeding. In: Nene, YL, Hall, SD and Sheila, VK (eds) The Pigeonpea. Wallingford: CAB International pp. 375–399.Google Scholar
Singh, SP, Tripathi, UK, Ram, DN, Kumar, S and Kumar, S (2002) Evaluation of germplasm in pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]. Progressive Agriculture 2(2): 163–165.Google Scholar
van der, and, Maesen, LJG (1980) India is the native home of the pigeonpea. Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen Miscellaneous Papers 19: 252–262.Google Scholar
Ward, J (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 38: 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, IH (1977) Behaviour of insects foraging on pigeonpea ( Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in India. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 54: 353–363.Google Scholar