Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T03:09:00.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Capability, Happiness and Adaptation in Sen and J. S. Mill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2006

MOZAFFAR QIZILBASH
Affiliation:
University of East Angliam.qizilbash@uea.ac.uk

Abstract

While there is much common ground between the writings of Amartya Sen and John Stuart Mill – particularly in their advocacy of freedom and gender equality – one is a critic, while the other is an advocate, of utilitarianism. In spite of this contrast, there are strong echoes of Sen's capability approach in Mill's writings. Inasmuch as Mill sees the capability to be happy as important he holds a form of capability approach. He also thinks of happiness as constituted by the exercise of certain capabilities (including the higher faculties). Furthermore, Mill addresses the possibility that people can adapt to limited opportunity, which is central to Sen's critique of some ‘utility’-based views. By contrasting contentment and happiness Mill suggests one way in which a utilitarian might address cases of adaptation. His discussions of capabilities and of adaptation are consistent with his utilitarianism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)