Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T11:08:25.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Mendel to multi-national in poultry breeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Werner Hartmann
Werner Hartmann
Affiliation:
Institut für Kleintierzucht, Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Dörnbergstrasse 25/27, D-3100 Celle, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Abstract

This paper attempts to identify and evaluate the contributions of genetics to the continuing rise in productivity that has been evident over the past 40 years or more. The importance of the fowl in establishing the validity of Mendel's laws of inheritance is shown, together with the findings that made the bird the species of choice for much of the early work on animal genetics. The early development of the egg production industry is outlined and the impetus given to this new commercial venture by the application of genetic principles, described. The poultry meat sector is also reviewed. The role of the geneticist in increasing productivity in terms of numbers of eggs laid, meat produced and quantities of food required to produce both products is discussed and quantitative data presented. The prospects for further improvements in productivity are assessed, particularly in the context of climatic and social environmental factors. The prospective role of genetic engineering is also considered.

Keywords

Geneticsproductivitybreeding plans
Type
Gordon Memorial Lecture
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 5 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abplanalp, H. (1982) Contribution of genetics to the solution of problems requiring multidisciplinary approaches. World's Poultry Science Journal, 38: 59–60.Google Scholar
Bateson, W. (1902) Experiments with poultry. Reports of the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society of London, 1: 87–124.Google Scholar
Bateson, W. and Punnett, R.C. (1905) A suggestion as to the nature of the ‘walnut’ comb in fowls. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 13: 165–168.Google Scholar
Bateson, W. and Punnett, R.C. (1908) Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity: Poultry. Reports of the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society of London, 4: 18–35.Google Scholar
Bulfield, G. (1985) The potential for improvement of commercial poultry by genetic engineering techniques, in: Poultry Genetics and Breeding (Eds Hill, W.G. et al. ) pp. 37–46 (Edinburgh, British Poultry Science Ltd.)Google Scholar
Bumstead, N. (1985) Genetics of the major histocompatibility complex in chickens, in: Poultry Genetics and Breeding (Eds Hill, W.G. et al. ) pp. 25–35 (Edinburgh, British Poultry Science Ltd.)Google Scholar
Card, L.E. (1961) Poultry Production, 9th edn (Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger).Google Scholar
Cook, R. (1937) A chronology of genetics, in: Yearbook of Agriculture, pp. 1457–1477 (Washington, United States Department of Agriculture).Google Scholar
Crittenden, L.B. (1986) Identification and cloning of genes for insertion. Poultry Science, 65: 1468–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, C.B. (1912) Sex-limited inheritance in poultry. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 13: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, G.E. and Lamoreux, W.F. (1955) Relative heterosis among components of performance in chickens severely exposed to respiratory disease. Poultry Science, 34: 1190.Google Scholar
Duncan, I.J.H. (1981) Animal rights—animal welfare: A scientist's assessment. Poultry Science, 60: 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, B.M. and Bumstead, N. (1987) Transgenic poultry: theory and practice. World's Poultry Science Journal 43: 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrken, E., Klein, F.W. and Poteracki, P. (1986) Jungmasthühner in der Prüfung. Deutsche Geflügelwirtschaft und Schweineproduktion, 38: 1177–1178.Google Scholar
Glazener, E.W., Comstock, R.E., Blow, W.L., Dearstyne, R.S. and Bostian, C.H. (1952) Crossbreeding for egg production. Poultry Science, 31: 1078–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, H.D. (1917) Crossing over in the sex chromosome of the male fowl. Science, 46: 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, H.D. (1918) Internal factors influencing egg production in the Rhode Island Red breed of domestic fowl. Americal Naturalist, 52: 65–94, 209–232, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowen, J.W. (1952) (Ed) Heterosis (Ames, Iowa, Iowa State College Press).Google Scholar
Gyles, N.R. (1979) How big will broilers get? Arkansas Farm Research, 28: 7.Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, A.L. (1927) An improved method of testing the quality of a breeders entire flock. 3rd World's Poultry Congress,Ottawa, pp. 95–98.Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, A.L. and Sykes, G. (1953) Poultry Breeding (London, Crosby Lockwood and Son, Ltd.).Google Scholar
Hartmann, W. (1988) Evaluation of ‘major genes’ affecting disease resitance in poultry. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 105, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, W. and Merat, P. (1986) Recent research on the breeding of egg production stock. Proceedings 7th European Poultry Conference, Paris, Volume 1, pp. 49–59.Google Scholar
Hartmann, W. and Heil, G. (1988) Amtliche Legeleistungsprüfung 1986/87—Zusammenfassende Auswertung. Deutsche Geflügelwirtschaft und Schweineproduktion, 40: 187–195.Google Scholar
Hartmann, W., Hala, K., Heil, G. and Krieg, R. (1986) Effect of B blood group genotypes on resistance to Marek's disease in Leghorn crosses. Proceedings 7th European Poultry Conference, Paris, Volume 1, pp. 216–220.Google Scholar
Hays, F.A. (1924) Inbreeding the Rhode Island Red fowl with special reference to winter egg production. American Naturalist, 58: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisdorf, A. (1969) Twenty years experience with reciprocal recurrent selection. Proceedings 18th Annual National Poultry Breeders' Roundtable, Kansas City, pp. 112–155.Google Scholar
Hurst, C.C. (1921) The genetics of egg production in White Leghorns and White Wyandottes, and its application to poultry breeding. 1st World's Poultry Congress,The Hague, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Hutt, F.B. (1936) Genetics of the fowl. 6. A tentative chromosome map. Duerst Festschrift ‘Neue Forschungen in Tierzucht und Abstammungslehre’, pp. 105–112 (Bern, Verbandsdruckerei AG).Google Scholar
Hutt, F.B. (1949) Genetics of the Fowl (New York, McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Hutt, F.B. and Cole, R.K. (1952) Heterosis in an interstrain cross of White Leghorns. Poultry Science 31: 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, M.A. (1940) Poultry Breeding. 2nd edn. (New York, John Wiley and Sons).Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. (1936) Chick-sexing. 6th World's Poultry Congress, Leipzig, Volume 1, pp. 175–179.Google Scholar
King, S.C. and Bruckner, J.H. (1952) A comparative analysis of purebred and crossbred poultry. Poultry Science, 31: 1030–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, C.W., Gordon, C.D. and Mehrhof, N.R. (1949) Performance of Rhode Island Reds and Light Sussex as compared with that of their F1 and three-way crossbreds. Poultry Science 28: 415–419.Google Scholar
Lerner, I.M. (1951) Principles of Commercial Poultry Breeding. Manual 1 (Berkeley, University of California College of Agriculture).Google Scholar
MacDougall, I. (1936) Laying trials. 6th World's Poultry Congress, Leipzig, Volume 1, pp. 193–198.Google Scholar
Masui, K. (1927) The rudimental copulatory organ of the male domestic fowl, with reference to the difference of the sexes in chickens. 3rd World's Poultry Congress,Ottawa, p. 156.Google Scholar
Masui, K. and Hashimoto, J. (1933) Sexing Baby Chicks (Vancouver, Journal Printing Company).Google Scholar
Merritt, E.S. and Gowe, R.S. (1960) Combining ability among breeds and strains of meat type fowl. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 2: 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moav, R. and Moav, J. (1966) Profit in a broiler enterprise as a function of egg production of parent stocks and growth rate of their progeny. British Poultry Science, 7: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesheim, M.C., Austic, R.E. and Card, L.E. (1979) Poultry Production, 12th edn (Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger).Google Scholar
Nordskog, A.W. (1966) Poultry random sample testing in U.S.—Trends and accomplishments. 13th World's Poultry Congress,Kiev, pp. 143–147.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A.W. and Ghostley, F.J. (1954) Heterosis in poultry. 1. Strain crossing and cross-breeding compared with closed flock breeding. Poultry Science, 33: 704–715.Google Scholar
Pearl, R. (1912) The mode of inheritance of fecundity in the domestic fowl. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 13: 153–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G.C. (1983) Intensive animal production and animal welfare: The present and the future. World's Poultry Science Journal, 39: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pingel, H. (1986) Recent research on the breeding of waterfowl. Proceedings 7th European Poultry Conference, Paris, Volume 1, pp. 70–81.Google Scholar
Punnett, R.C. (1919) The early elimination of surplus cockerels. Journal of the Board of Agriculture, 15: 1319.Google Scholar
Punnett, R.C. (1930) Some experiments concerning fecundity. 4th World's Poultry Congress,London, pp. 34–37.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.C. and Smith, C. (1982) Genes with large effects—Theoretical aspects in livestock breeding. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Volume 6, pp. 420–438.Google Scholar
Salter, D.W., Smith, E.J., Hughes, S.H., Wright, S.E. and Crittenden, L.B. (1987) Transgenic chickens: insertion of retroviral genes in the chicken germ line. Virology 157: 236–240.Google Scholar
Schaible, P.J. (1970) Poultry Feeds and Nutrition (Westport Conn., AVI Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
Seeger, K.C., Tomhave, A.E. and Shrader, H.L. (1948) The results of the Chicken-of-Tomorrow 1948 national contest. Publ. No. 65 (Newark, Agricultural Experiment Station University of Delaware).Google Scholar
Shoffner, R.N. (1986) Perspectives for molecular genetics research and application in poultry. Poultry Science 65: 1489–1496.Google Scholar
Shuman, R.M. and Shoffner, R.N. (1986) Gene transfer by avian retroviruses. Poultry Science, 65: 1437–1444.Google Scholar
Siegel, P.B. (1976) Social behaviour of the fowl. Poultry Science, 55: 5–13.Google Scholar
Siegel, P.B. (1979) Behaviour genetics in chickens: A review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 35: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, P.B. (1984) The role of behaviour in poultry production: A review of research. Applied Animal Ethology, 11: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaller, F. (1954) Heterosis from crisscross breeding in poultry. 10th World's Poultry Congress,Edinburgh, Section Papers, pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
Sorensen, P. and Leenstra, F. (1986) Recent research on breeding of meat production stocks. Proceedings 7th European Poultry Conference, Paris, Volume 1, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
Somes, R.G. (1984) International Registry of Poultry Genetic Stocks. Bulletin 469 (Storrs, The University of Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station).Google Scholar
Sturtevant, A.H. (1912) An experiment dealing with sex-linkage in fowls. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 12: 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (1960–1979) Reports of random sample egg production tests in United States and Canada. ARS 44–79 and ARS-NE-21 (Washington, D.C., Agricultural Research Service).Google Scholar
Warren, D.C. (1927) Hybrid vigour in poultry. Poultry Science, 7: 1–7.Google Scholar
Warren, D.C. (1930) Inheritance of vigour in the domestic fowl. 4th World's Poultry Congress,London, pp. 146–151.Google Scholar
Warren, D.C. (1958) A half century of advances in the genetics and breeding improvement of poultry. Poultry Science, 37: 3–20.Google Scholar
Working Group No. 3 (1981) combined summary of European random sample egg production tests 1978–1979. World's Poultry Science Journal, 37: 218–221.Google Scholar
Working Group No. 3 (1986) combined summary of European random sample egg production tests 1981–1984. World's Poultry Science Journal, 42: 276–284.Google Scholar