Against Individualistic Justifications of Property Rights

a1 University of Stirling Rowan.Cruft@stir.ac.uk

Article author query
cruft r   [Google Scholar] 


In this article I argue that, despite the views of such theorists as Locke, Hart and Raz, most of a person's property rights cannot be individualistically justified. Instead most property rights, if justified at all, must be justified on non-individualistic (e.g. consequentialist) grounds. This, I suggest, implies that most property rights cannot be morally fundamental ‘human rights’.